企业与代表性:从现在开始该何去何从?

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS CogniTextes Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI:10.4000/cognitextes.1311
S. Raineri, C. Debras
{"title":"企业与代表性:从现在开始该何去何从?","authors":"S. Raineri, C. Debras","doi":"10.4000/cognitextes.1311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twentieth-century structuralist and generative linguists argued that the study of the language system (langue, competence) must be separated from the study of language use (parole, performance). For Saussure or Chomsky, no generalizations about language could be made based on the observation of patterns, regularities and rules of language performance. For Saussure, “Il n’y a donc rien de collectif dans la parole ; les manifestations en sont individuelles et momentanees. Ici il n’y a rien de p...","PeriodicalId":53774,"journal":{"name":"CogniTextes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corpora and Representativeness: Where to go from now?\",\"authors\":\"S. Raineri, C. Debras\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/cognitextes.1311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Twentieth-century structuralist and generative linguists argued that the study of the language system (langue, competence) must be separated from the study of language use (parole, performance). For Saussure or Chomsky, no generalizations about language could be made based on the observation of patterns, regularities and rules of language performance. For Saussure, “Il n’y a donc rien de collectif dans la parole ; les manifestations en sont individuelles et momentanees. Ici il n’y a rien de p...\",\"PeriodicalId\":53774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CogniTextes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CogniTextes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.1311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CogniTextes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.1311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

20世纪的结构主义和生成语言学家认为,对语言系统(语言、能力)的研究必须与对语言使用(言语、表现)的研究分开。对于索绪尔和乔姆斯基来说,不能基于对语言表现模式、规律和规则的观察来概括语言。对于索绪尔来说,“我是集体假释的朋友;这是个人和时刻的表现。我是一个朋友。。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corpora and Representativeness: Where to go from now?
Twentieth-century structuralist and generative linguists argued that the study of the language system (langue, competence) must be separated from the study of language use (parole, performance). For Saussure or Chomsky, no generalizations about language could be made based on the observation of patterns, regularities and rules of language performance. For Saussure, “Il n’y a donc rien de collectif dans la parole ; les manifestations en sont individuelles et momentanees. Ici il n’y a rien de p...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CogniTextes
CogniTextes LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating English clippings experimentally: Why markedness is always local: the case of Russian aspect Bounding in French and Romance Probing the role of bounding, definiteness and other factors: bare noun and determiner use in Guianese French Creole Reference, Deixis and Perspective.Aspectual Readings of Italian Ecco- and French
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1