《国际商事合同通则》和《国际商事合同单一性原则》下的艰难与豁免/不可抗力原则再认识

Q2 Social Sciences Global Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2019-04-05 DOI:10.1163/2211906X-00801003
N. Nwafor, C. Lloyd
{"title":"《国际商事合同通则》和《国际商事合同单一性原则》下的艰难与豁免/不可抗力原则再认识","authors":"N. Nwafor, C. Lloyd","doi":"10.1163/2211906X-00801003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The doctrines of hardship, frustration, exemption and force majeure are all exceptions to the doctrine of mandatory enforceability of commercial contracts. However, cisg and the unidroit Principles followed different approaches in the development of impossibility jurisprudence under commercial contracts. The aim of this paper is to critically inquire whether the silence about doctrine of hardship under the cisg can conveniently be cured by the exemption provision of article 79 cisg, and whether the provision for hardship under the unidroit Principles can be used to fill the lacuna created under the cisg. This paper will utilise doctrinal research methodology with comparative approach in addressing the issues arising from the subject matter of the paper.","PeriodicalId":38000,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/2211906X-00801003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-imagining the Doctrines of Hardship and Exemption/Force Majeure under the cisg and unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts\",\"authors\":\"N. Nwafor, C. Lloyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/2211906X-00801003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The doctrines of hardship, frustration, exemption and force majeure are all exceptions to the doctrine of mandatory enforceability of commercial contracts. However, cisg and the unidroit Principles followed different approaches in the development of impossibility jurisprudence under commercial contracts. The aim of this paper is to critically inquire whether the silence about doctrine of hardship under the cisg can conveniently be cured by the exemption provision of article 79 cisg, and whether the provision for hardship under the unidroit Principles can be used to fill the lacuna created under the cisg. This paper will utilise doctrinal research methodology with comparative approach in addressing the issues arising from the subject matter of the paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Comparative Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/2211906X-00801003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00801003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00801003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

困难原则、挫折原则、豁免原则和不可抗力原则都是商业合同强制执行原则的例外。但是,商事合同不可能法理学的发展与统一法原则的发展方向不同。本文的目的是批判性地探讨《公约》第79条的豁免条款是否可以方便地弥补《公约》规定的困难原则的沉默,以及《公约》规定的困难条款是否可以用来填补《公约》所造成的空白。本文将利用理论研究方法与比较方法来解决由论文主题引起的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-imagining the Doctrines of Hardship and Exemption/Force Majeure under the cisg and unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts
The doctrines of hardship, frustration, exemption and force majeure are all exceptions to the doctrine of mandatory enforceability of commercial contracts. However, cisg and the unidroit Principles followed different approaches in the development of impossibility jurisprudence under commercial contracts. The aim of this paper is to critically inquire whether the silence about doctrine of hardship under the cisg can conveniently be cured by the exemption provision of article 79 cisg, and whether the provision for hardship under the unidroit Principles can be used to fill the lacuna created under the cisg. This paper will utilise doctrinal research methodology with comparative approach in addressing the issues arising from the subject matter of the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Journal of Comparative Law
Global Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Global Journal of Comparative Law is a peer reviewed periodical that provides a dynamic platform for the dissemination of ideas on comparative law and reports on developments in the field of comparative law from all parts of the world. In our contemporary globalized world, it is almost impossible to isolate developments in the law in one jurisdiction or society from another. At the same time, what is traditionally called comparative law is increasingly subsumed under aspects of International Law. The Global Journal of Comparative Law therefore aims to maintain the discipline of comparative legal studies as vigorous and dynamic by deepening the space for comparative work in its transnational context.
期刊最新文献
Access to Public Documents and Its Restrictions: a Reflection from the Perspectives of Brazil and Sweden Comparative Study of Selected Nigerian and Indian Labour Practices and the Law The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism Regulating Surrogacy as a Reproductive Practice in India and Sri Lanka Use of Specialized Tribunals for the Settlement of Construction Projects in Times of a Financial Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1