案件C-243/15 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK诉Obvod nýúrad Trenčín

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law Pub Date : 2017-04-21 DOI:10.1163/18760104-01401008

Matthijs van Wolferen

{"title":"案件C-243/15 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK诉Obvod nýúrad Trenčín","authors":"Matthijs van Wolferen","doi":"10.1163/18760104-01401008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussion on the relevance of Case C-243/15 Lesoochranarske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný urad Trencin, the 'second Slovak bear' case. Where the Habitats Directive is again linked to access to justice as prescribed by the Aarhus Convention, this time in conjunction with Article 47 Charter on a right to a remedy. This is a proof-version, for citation and research purposes, please refer to the final version at the JEEPL site.","PeriodicalId":43633,"journal":{"name":"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"136-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18760104-01401008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case C-243/15 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný úrad Trenčín\",\"authors\":\"Matthijs van Wolferen\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18760104-01401008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussion on the relevance of Case C-243/15 Lesoochranarske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný urad Trencin, the 'second Slovak bear' case. Where the Habitats Directive is again linked to access to justice as prescribed by the Aarhus Convention, this time in conjunction with Article 47 Charter on a right to a remedy. This is a proof-version, for citation and research purposes, please refer to the final version at the JEEPL site.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"136-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18760104-01401008\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01401008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01401008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

关于“第二只斯洛伐克熊”案件C-243/15 Lesoochranarske zoskupenie VLK诉Obvodnýurad Trencin的相关性的讨论。如果《居住指令》再次与《奥胡斯公约》规定的诉诸司法联系在一起，这一次是与《宪章》关于补救权的第47条相结合。这是一个证明版本，出于引用和研究目的，请参阅JEEPL网站上的最终版本。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Case C-243/15 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný úrad Trenčín

Discussion on the relevance of Case C-243/15 Lesoochranarske zoskupenie VLK v Obvodný urad Trencin, the 'second Slovak bear' case. Where the Habitats Directive is again linked to access to justice as prescribed by the Aarhus Convention, this time in conjunction with Article 47 Charter on a right to a remedy. This is a proof-version, for citation and research purposes, please refer to the final version at the JEEPL site.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助