国防工业私有化的好处:第二次世界大战以来的市场、技术和美国军事优势

Q3 Social Sciences Comparative Strategy Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1080/01495933.2022.2039011
Valentin Lara
{"title":"国防工业私有化的好处:第二次世界大战以来的市场、技术和美国军事优势","authors":"Valentin Lara","doi":"10.1080/01495933.2022.2039011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recently, China and Russia have taken unnoticed steps to partially privatize their defense industries to make them more innovative. If successful, these reforms could seriously alter the international balance of power at the expense of the United States. However, previous academic writings have usually been skeptical of the benefits of privatization in the defense industry. I argue that private markets constitute the best way to instill innovativeness in the defense industry. To demonstrate it, I compare the technological performance of the defense industry of two extreme and opposite cases, namely the United States and the USSR during the Cold War.","PeriodicalId":35161,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Strategy","volume":"41 1","pages":"162 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The benefits of defense industry privatization: Markets, technology and U.S. military supremacy since World War II\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Lara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01495933.2022.2039011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Recently, China and Russia have taken unnoticed steps to partially privatize their defense industries to make them more innovative. If successful, these reforms could seriously alter the international balance of power at the expense of the United States. However, previous academic writings have usually been skeptical of the benefits of privatization in the defense industry. I argue that private markets constitute the best way to instill innovativeness in the defense industry. To demonstrate it, I compare the technological performance of the defense industry of two extreme and opposite cases, namely the United States and the USSR during the Cold War.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Strategy\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"162 - 188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Strategy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2022.2039011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2022.2039011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,中国和俄罗斯采取了不为人注意的措施,将其国防工业部分私有化,以使其更具创新性。如果成功,这些改革可能会严重改变国际力量平衡,而美国则会付出代价。然而,以前的学术著作通常对国防工业私有化的好处持怀疑态度。我认为,私人市场是向国防工业灌输创新精神的最佳途径。为了证明这一点,我比较了两个极端和相反的案例,即冷战时期的美国和苏联的国防工业的技术绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The benefits of defense industry privatization: Markets, technology and U.S. military supremacy since World War II
Abstract Recently, China and Russia have taken unnoticed steps to partially privatize their defense industries to make them more innovative. If successful, these reforms could seriously alter the international balance of power at the expense of the United States. However, previous academic writings have usually been skeptical of the benefits of privatization in the defense industry. I argue that private markets constitute the best way to instill innovativeness in the defense industry. To demonstrate it, I compare the technological performance of the defense industry of two extreme and opposite cases, namely the United States and the USSR during the Cold War.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Strategy
Comparative Strategy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
How many nuclear weapons does Russia have? The size and characteristics of the Russian nuclear stockpile Well-being and burnout in medical students: challenges and solutions. Controlling the capital: Political dominance in the urbanizing worldControlling the capital: Political dominance in the urbanizing world, by Tom Goodfellow and David Jackman, Oxford University Press, (2023), 288 pp, 110$, ISBN: 9780192868329 Morality, strategy, and emotions: What can contemporary psychological research tell us about their relationship? Japan’s potential assistance in South Korea’s nuclear deterrence and defense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1