专题导论:土地统治政权的政治与情境实践

IF 1.7 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING International Planning Studies Pub Date : 2020-06-16 DOI:10.1080/13563475.2020.1770057
Nina Gribat, Barbara Pizzo
{"title":"专题导论:土地统治政权的政治与情境实践","authors":"Nina Gribat, Barbara Pizzo","doi":"10.1080/13563475.2020.1770057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This special issue examines the politics of land focusing on the intersections of dominant land and property regimes and situated land practices that are not characterized by open conflict, but rather mundane everyday negotiations. The selected papers show that the interrelations between landed practices and regimes of land are extremely variegated and complex, shaped by socio-economic factors as well as by their own peculiar geographies and temporalities. Thus, they can be examined most adequately in the specific geographic, socio-economic and historical context in which they materialize. Structural factors matter, but they are (continuously) challenged by the agency and everyday practices of many different actors, pursuing different and mutable objectives and following varying trajectories, often far away from the established rules. Viewed like this, dominant regimes of land appear to be less overarching and monolithic than commonly understood.","PeriodicalId":46688,"journal":{"name":"International Planning Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"237 - 246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13563475.2020.1770057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the special issue: the politics of land – dominant regimes and situated practices\",\"authors\":\"Nina Gribat, Barbara Pizzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13563475.2020.1770057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This special issue examines the politics of land focusing on the intersections of dominant land and property regimes and situated land practices that are not characterized by open conflict, but rather mundane everyday negotiations. The selected papers show that the interrelations between landed practices and regimes of land are extremely variegated and complex, shaped by socio-economic factors as well as by their own peculiar geographies and temporalities. Thus, they can be examined most adequately in the specific geographic, socio-economic and historical context in which they materialize. Structural factors matter, but they are (continuously) challenged by the agency and everyday practices of many different actors, pursuing different and mutable objectives and following varying trajectories, often far away from the established rules. Viewed like this, dominant regimes of land appear to be less overarching and monolithic than commonly understood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Planning Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"237 - 246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13563475.2020.1770057\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Planning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2020.1770057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2020.1770057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这期特刊考察了土地政治,重点关注主要土地和财产制度的交叉点,以及不以公开冲突为特征的土地实践,而是平凡的日常谈判。选定的论文表明,土地实践和土地制度之间的相互关系是极其多样化和复杂的,受社会经济因素以及其自身特殊的地理和时间的影响。因此,可以在它们产生的具体地理、社会经济和历史背景下对它们进行最充分的审查。结构因素很重要,但它们(不断地)受到许多不同行为者的机构和日常实践的挑战,这些行为者追求不同的和可变的目标,遵循不同的轨迹,往往远离既定的规则。从这个角度来看,土地的主导政权似乎没有人们通常理解的那么包罗万象和铁板一块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction to the special issue: the politics of land – dominant regimes and situated practices
ABSTRACT This special issue examines the politics of land focusing on the intersections of dominant land and property regimes and situated land practices that are not characterized by open conflict, but rather mundane everyday negotiations. The selected papers show that the interrelations between landed practices and regimes of land are extremely variegated and complex, shaped by socio-economic factors as well as by their own peculiar geographies and temporalities. Thus, they can be examined most adequately in the specific geographic, socio-economic and historical context in which they materialize. Structural factors matter, but they are (continuously) challenged by the agency and everyday practices of many different actors, pursuing different and mutable objectives and following varying trajectories, often far away from the established rules. Viewed like this, dominant regimes of land appear to be less overarching and monolithic than commonly understood.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Planning Studies
International Planning Studies REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Planning, at urban, regional, national and international levels, faces new challenges, notably those related to the growth of globalisation as both an objective socio-economic process and a shift in policy-maker perceptions and modes of analysis. International Planning Studies (IPS) addresses these issues by publishing quality research in a variety of specific fields and from a range of theoretical and normative perspectives, which helps improve understanding of the actual and potential role of planning and planners in this context.
期刊最新文献
Spatial analysis of regional income inequality in EU countries The role and significance of planning consultants as intermediary-actors: between and amongst government, civic society and the market What happens to the residential land value with the construction of megamalls? (Evidence from Tabriz) A smart city for all citizens: an exploration of children’s participation in Norway’s smartest city Reimagining alternative future development trajectories of shrinking Finnish cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1