研究数据管理馆员学院(RDMLA)的可用性评估:考察学习者差异对教学可用性的影响

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Web Librarianship Pub Date : 2021-06-16 DOI:10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442
Rong Tang, Zhan Hu, Nicole Henry, Ashley Thomas
{"title":"研究数据管理馆员学院(RDMLA)的可用性评估:考察学习者差异对教学可用性的影响","authors":"Rong Tang, Zhan Hu, Nicole Henry, Ashley Thomas","doi":"10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper reports the results of a usability and user experience (UX) investigation into the Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA) course site, a free online learning platform developed through community effort. Remote synchronous usability test sessions were run with 42 participants. Participants completed a pre-session interview, performed tasks related to the course orientation unit and two content units, and filled out a post-session questionnaire. Significant differences were found among people with different demographic attributes, educational backgrounds, occupations, and levels of research data management (RDM) training, in areas related to self-rating, task performance, and post-task and post-session evaluations of RDMLA. Significant correlations occurred among participants’ pre-session, post-task, and post-session ratings, as well as performance measures. Qualitative descriptions of the participants’ perceptions of the future of RDM in LIS were also reported. The study results indicate a need to add a new criterion - diverse learner population - into the framework of pedagogical usability.","PeriodicalId":54091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Web Librarianship","volume":"15 1","pages":"154 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Usability Evaluation of Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA): Examining the Impact of Learner Differences in Pedagogical Usability\",\"authors\":\"Rong Tang, Zhan Hu, Nicole Henry, Ashley Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper reports the results of a usability and user experience (UX) investigation into the Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA) course site, a free online learning platform developed through community effort. Remote synchronous usability test sessions were run with 42 participants. Participants completed a pre-session interview, performed tasks related to the course orientation unit and two content units, and filled out a post-session questionnaire. Significant differences were found among people with different demographic attributes, educational backgrounds, occupations, and levels of research data management (RDM) training, in areas related to self-rating, task performance, and post-task and post-session evaluations of RDMLA. Significant correlations occurred among participants’ pre-session, post-task, and post-session ratings, as well as performance measures. Qualitative descriptions of the participants’ perceptions of the future of RDM in LIS were also reported. The study results indicate a need to add a new criterion - diverse learner population - into the framework of pedagogical usability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Web Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"154 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Web Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Web Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2021.1937442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文报告了研究数据管理图书馆员学院(RDMLA)课程网站的可用性和用户体验(UX)调查结果,RDMLA是一个通过社区努力开发的免费在线学习平台。远程同步可用性测试会话由42名参与者进行。参与者完成了一次会前访谈,完成了与课程定位单元和两个内容单元相关的任务,并填写了一份会后问卷。不同人口统计属性、教育背景、职业和RDM培训水平的人群在RDM自评、任务绩效、任务后和会话后评价等方面存在显著差异。参与者在会议前、任务后和会议后的评分以及表现指标之间存在显著的相关性。还报告了参与者对LIS中RDM未来的看法的定性描述。研究结果表明,有必要在教学可用性的框架中增加一个新的标准——多样化的学习者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Usability Evaluation of Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA): Examining the Impact of Learner Differences in Pedagogical Usability
Abstract This paper reports the results of a usability and user experience (UX) investigation into the Research Data Management Librarian Academy (RDMLA) course site, a free online learning platform developed through community effort. Remote synchronous usability test sessions were run with 42 participants. Participants completed a pre-session interview, performed tasks related to the course orientation unit and two content units, and filled out a post-session questionnaire. Significant differences were found among people with different demographic attributes, educational backgrounds, occupations, and levels of research data management (RDM) training, in areas related to self-rating, task performance, and post-task and post-session evaluations of RDMLA. Significant correlations occurred among participants’ pre-session, post-task, and post-session ratings, as well as performance measures. Qualitative descriptions of the participants’ perceptions of the future of RDM in LIS were also reported. The study results indicate a need to add a new criterion - diverse learner population - into the framework of pedagogical usability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Web Librarianship
Journal of Web Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Academic Libraries and Collaborative Research Services AI and the Future of Library and Information Science Introduction to the Special Issue Change What You Can, Teach What You Can’t: A Usability Study of Primo VE at an Academic Library The Impact of ChatGPT for Enhancing Knowledge Management in University Libraries Exploring the Prospects and Perils of Integrating Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Academic and Research Libraries (ARL): Challenges and Opportunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1