设计的合法性——考虑法律要求的合法设计模式的开发和评估

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS European Journal of Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/0960085x.2023.2174050
Ernestine Dickhaut, Andreas Janson, Matthias Söllner, J. Leimeister
{"title":"设计的合法性——考虑法律要求的合法设计模式的开发和评估","authors":"Ernestine Dickhaut, Andreas Janson, Matthias Söllner, J. Leimeister","doi":"10.1080/0960085x.2023.2174050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New political objectives, emerging regulatory regimes for the digital sphere, and higher penalties for violations have intensified the pressure to develop lawful IT artefacts. As the adaptation of existing IT artefacts to new regulations can be expensive and arduous, a more attractive approach would be to design IT artefacts lawfully from the beginning. A major challenge is that the law is generally technology-neutral, and lawful design requires legal expertise throughout the development, which is costly and time consuming due to communication challenges between legal experts and developers. One possible approach to proactively consider IT regulations in the systems development is design patterns that convey legal design knowledge and support developers in determining the appropriate design options. Consequently, we develop a framework for lawful design patterns and demonstrate their feasibility and advantages using the example of developing AI-based assistants and the regulation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Using the design pattern framework, we develop design patterns for lawful AI-based assistants and evaluate them using (a) an experimental approach to show the usefulness of the patterns for developers and (b) rely on a legal simulation study to holistically evaluate how design patterns contribute to lawful IT.","PeriodicalId":50486,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lawfulness by design – development and evaluation of lawful design patterns to consider legal requirements\",\"authors\":\"Ernestine Dickhaut, Andreas Janson, Matthias Söllner, J. Leimeister\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0960085x.2023.2174050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New political objectives, emerging regulatory regimes for the digital sphere, and higher penalties for violations have intensified the pressure to develop lawful IT artefacts. As the adaptation of existing IT artefacts to new regulations can be expensive and arduous, a more attractive approach would be to design IT artefacts lawfully from the beginning. A major challenge is that the law is generally technology-neutral, and lawful design requires legal expertise throughout the development, which is costly and time consuming due to communication challenges between legal experts and developers. One possible approach to proactively consider IT regulations in the systems development is design patterns that convey legal design knowledge and support developers in determining the appropriate design options. Consequently, we develop a framework for lawful design patterns and demonstrate their feasibility and advantages using the example of developing AI-based assistants and the regulation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Using the design pattern framework, we develop design patterns for lawful AI-based assistants and evaluate them using (a) an experimental approach to show the usefulness of the patterns for developers and (b) rely on a legal simulation study to holistically evaluate how design patterns contribute to lawful IT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Information Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2023.2174050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2023.2174050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

新的政治目标、新兴的数字领域监管制度,以及对违规行为的更高惩罚,都加大了开发合法IT产品的压力。由于现有IT工件对新法规的适应可能是昂贵和艰巨的,因此更有吸引力的方法是从一开始就合法地设计IT工件。一个主要的挑战是法律通常是技术中立的,合法的设计需要整个开发过程中的法律专业知识,由于法律专家和开发人员之间的沟通挑战,这是昂贵和耗时的。在系统开发中主动考虑IT规则的一种可能方法是设计模式,它传递合法的设计知识,并支持开发人员确定适当的设计选项。因此,我们为合法的设计模式开发了一个框架,并通过开发基于人工智能的助手和通用数据保护条例(GDPR)的监管的例子来证明它们的可行性和优势。使用设计模式框架,我们为合法的基于人工智能的助手开发设计模式,并使用(a)实验方法来显示模式对开发人员的有用性,以及(b)依靠法律模拟研究来全面评估设计模式如何为合法的IT做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lawfulness by design – development and evaluation of lawful design patterns to consider legal requirements
New political objectives, emerging regulatory regimes for the digital sphere, and higher penalties for violations have intensified the pressure to develop lawful IT artefacts. As the adaptation of existing IT artefacts to new regulations can be expensive and arduous, a more attractive approach would be to design IT artefacts lawfully from the beginning. A major challenge is that the law is generally technology-neutral, and lawful design requires legal expertise throughout the development, which is costly and time consuming due to communication challenges between legal experts and developers. One possible approach to proactively consider IT regulations in the systems development is design patterns that convey legal design knowledge and support developers in determining the appropriate design options. Consequently, we develop a framework for lawful design patterns and demonstrate their feasibility and advantages using the example of developing AI-based assistants and the regulation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Using the design pattern framework, we develop design patterns for lawful AI-based assistants and evaluate them using (a) an experimental approach to show the usefulness of the patterns for developers and (b) rely on a legal simulation study to holistically evaluate how design patterns contribute to lawful IT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Information Systems
European Journal of Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Information Systems offers a unique European perspective on the theory and practice of information systems for a global readership. We actively seek first-rate articles that offer a critical examination of information technology, covering its effects, development, implementation, strategy, management, and policy.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling motivational configurations in shaping meaningful engagement in green gamification Determinants of gamification effectiveness: perspectives of technology affordances and coping responses in the context of team-based gamified training Examining the impact of mobile gambling harm minimisation features: a dualistic model of passion perspective Achieving strategic alignment between business and information technology with information technology governance: the role of commitment to principles and Top Leadership Support Reducing the incidence of biased algorithmic decisions through feature importance transparency: an empirical study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1