为什么不是还原论?

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 0 PHILOSOPHY Journal of Consciousness Studies Pub Date : 2022-07-14 DOI:10.53765/20512201.29.7.218
Nico Orlandi
{"title":"为什么不是还原论?","authors":"Nico Orlandi","doi":"10.53765/20512201.29.7.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neurocognitive Mechanisms is a well-informed and provocative book. In these comments, I raise questions about the distinctiveness of Piccinini's positive proposals when it comes to the status of the special sciences and to the notion of mental representation.","PeriodicalId":47796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consciousness Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Not Reductionism?\",\"authors\":\"Nico Orlandi\",\"doi\":\"10.53765/20512201.29.7.218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neurocognitive Mechanisms is a well-informed and provocative book. In these comments, I raise questions about the distinctiveness of Piccinini's positive proposals when it comes to the status of the special sciences and to the notion of mental representation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consciousness Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consciousness Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.29.7.218\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consciousness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.29.7.218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《神经认知机制》是一本见多识广、富有煽动性的书。在这些评论中,当涉及到特殊科学的地位和心理表征的概念时,我对皮奇尼尼的积极建议的独特性提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Not Reductionism?
Neurocognitive Mechanisms is a well-informed and provocative book. In these comments, I raise questions about the distinctiveness of Piccinini's positive proposals when it comes to the status of the special sciences and to the notion of mental representation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
What Self in Self-Organization? Engaging Varela's Epistemology for the Co-embodied Self Enactment: A Preliminary Study in Varela and Traditional Metaphysics Autopoiesis, Autonomy, and Eigenform Life After 'Life After Kant' Other Minds with Jonas and Merleau-Ponty At the Cradle of Things The Act of Distinction and Francisco Varela's Non-Dualist Thought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1