巴赫的小提琴独奏和大提琴组曲的来源观察

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 MUSIC BACH Pub Date : 2022-05-03 DOI:10.1353/bach.2022.0000
Andrew Talle
{"title":"巴赫的小提琴独奏和大提琴组曲的来源观察","authors":"Andrew Talle","doi":"10.1353/bach.2022.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The early history of Johann Sebastian Bach’s Violin Sonatas and Partitas and Cello Suites is obscure and has been the subject of much speculation. This article seeks to dispel some widespread misinformation about the sources and to offer new insights into the genesis and reception of this famous music. Disrupting the scholarly consensus of the past several decades, I argue that there are no surviving early versions of either collection: every known copy of the Violin Sonatas and Partitas traces its ancestry to the composer’s 1720 autograph, and every known copy of the Cello Suites traces its ancestry to a lost (autograph?) manuscript known in the literature as Source [F]. Further, I propose identifications of the scribe who copied an influential manuscript of the Violin Sonatas and Partitas in the 1720s (Violin Source C) and the musician who provided Johann Peter Kellner with his models for both collections (Violin Source D and Cello Source B). Finally, I argue that Johann Justus Friedrich Dotzauer’s edition of the Cello Suites (Leipzig, 1826?) is based not on Kellner’s manuscript (Cello Source B), but rather on Kellner’s model, or a different copy thereof. We know little about how Bach’s contemporaries used his unaccompanied works for violin and cello, but knowing the names and biographies of those who came into contact with this music furnishes us with a basis for asking new questions.","PeriodicalId":42367,"journal":{"name":"BACH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Observations on the Sources for Bach’s Violin Soli and Cello Suites\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Talle\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/bach.2022.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The early history of Johann Sebastian Bach’s Violin Sonatas and Partitas and Cello Suites is obscure and has been the subject of much speculation. This article seeks to dispel some widespread misinformation about the sources and to offer new insights into the genesis and reception of this famous music. Disrupting the scholarly consensus of the past several decades, I argue that there are no surviving early versions of either collection: every known copy of the Violin Sonatas and Partitas traces its ancestry to the composer’s 1720 autograph, and every known copy of the Cello Suites traces its ancestry to a lost (autograph?) manuscript known in the literature as Source [F]. Further, I propose identifications of the scribe who copied an influential manuscript of the Violin Sonatas and Partitas in the 1720s (Violin Source C) and the musician who provided Johann Peter Kellner with his models for both collections (Violin Source D and Cello Source B). Finally, I argue that Johann Justus Friedrich Dotzauer’s edition of the Cello Suites (Leipzig, 1826?) is based not on Kellner’s manuscript (Cello Source B), but rather on Kellner’s model, or a different copy thereof. We know little about how Bach’s contemporaries used his unaccompanied works for violin and cello, but knowing the names and biographies of those who came into contact with this music furnishes us with a basis for asking new questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BACH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BACH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/bach.2022.0000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BACH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bach.2022.0000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:巴赫的小提琴奏鸣曲、组曲和大提琴组曲的早期历史是模糊的,一直是人们猜测的主题。本文试图消除一些关于音乐来源的广泛错误信息,并对这首著名音乐的起源和接受提供新的见解。打破了过去几十年的学术共识,我认为这两个系列都没有幸存的早期版本:每一本已知的《小提琴奏鸣曲》和《Partitas》都可以追溯到作曲家1720年的亲笔签名,而每一本大提琴组曲都可以追溯其祖先,追溯到文献中称为来源的一本丢失的(亲笔签名?)手稿[F]。此外,我建议确认1720年代抄写小提琴奏鸣曲和Partitas的一份有影响力的手稿的抄写员(小提琴源C),以及为约翰·彼得·凯尔纳提供两个系列模型的音乐家(小提琴源D和大提琴源B)。最后,我认为Johann Justus Friedrich Dotzauer的大提琴组曲(莱比锡,1826。我们对巴赫的同时代人是如何将他的无伴奏作品用于小提琴和大提琴的知之甚少,但了解那些接触过这种音乐的人的名字和传记为我们提出新问题提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Some Observations on the Sources for Bach’s Violin Soli and Cello Suites
Abstract:The early history of Johann Sebastian Bach’s Violin Sonatas and Partitas and Cello Suites is obscure and has been the subject of much speculation. This article seeks to dispel some widespread misinformation about the sources and to offer new insights into the genesis and reception of this famous music. Disrupting the scholarly consensus of the past several decades, I argue that there are no surviving early versions of either collection: every known copy of the Violin Sonatas and Partitas traces its ancestry to the composer’s 1720 autograph, and every known copy of the Cello Suites traces its ancestry to a lost (autograph?) manuscript known in the literature as Source [F]. Further, I propose identifications of the scribe who copied an influential manuscript of the Violin Sonatas and Partitas in the 1720s (Violin Source C) and the musician who provided Johann Peter Kellner with his models for both collections (Violin Source D and Cello Source B). Finally, I argue that Johann Justus Friedrich Dotzauer’s edition of the Cello Suites (Leipzig, 1826?) is based not on Kellner’s manuscript (Cello Source B), but rather on Kellner’s model, or a different copy thereof. We know little about how Bach’s contemporaries used his unaccompanied works for violin and cello, but knowing the names and biographies of those who came into contact with this music furnishes us with a basis for asking new questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BACH
BACH MUSIC-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Let's Calculate Bach: Applying Information Theory and Statistics to Numbers in Music by Alan Shepherd (review) Two New Possible Models for the "Confiteor" of J. S. Bach's Mass in B Minor Bach Studies: Liturgy, Hymnology, and Theology by Robin A. Leaver (review) Tales from Music School: Johann Friedrich Fasch at the Thomasschule (1701–1707) Late Bach and Late Style Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1