辐射安全标准和辐射安全基本卫生规则:关于开发新版本的建议

A. Simakov, V. Klochkov, Y. Abramov
{"title":"辐射安全标准和辐射安全基本卫生规则:关于开发新版本的建议","authors":"A. Simakov, V. Klochkov, Y. Abramov","doi":"10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-4-20-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work is to improve the Russian Radiation Safety Standards (NRB) in terms of the interpretation of the meaning of “the main limit of the annual effective dose” and the use of the concept of “emergency”. In [1], proposals were submitted to discuss the changing in new versions of NRB and the Main Health Rules for Radiation Safety (OSPORB) in terms of the interpretation of the concept of “the limit of the annual effective dose of man-caused occupational exposure” and health physics regulation of radionuclide contents in solid materials for free or limited use of these materials. The current NRB-99/2009 uses the term “radiation accident” and establishes the main limits of effective dose (Table 3.1.) for personnel and the public: ‒ for the personnel A group, the annual dose limit is 50 mSv under the mandatory condition of not exceeding the average annual value of 20 mSv for any consecutive 5 years; ‒ for the public, the annual dose limit is 5 mSv under the mandatory condition of not exceeding the average annual value of 1 mSv for any consecutive 5 years. However, in design documentation for the construction and reconstruction of nuclear facilities, in draft regulatory and methodological documents, there are periodically misinterpretations of the main dose limits for personnel and the public and an incorrect interpretation of the term “radiation accident”. In many cases, a dose of 20 mSv is called the annual dose limit for personnel, and a dose of 50 mSv/year is either not mentioned at all, or is considered only as permissible in a radiation accident. The term “radiation accident” is often treated as a synonym for “emergency”. The paper justifies the expediency of introducing relevant changes to the text of new NRB.","PeriodicalId":37358,"journal":{"name":"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation Safety Standards and Basic Health Rules for Radiation Safety: Proposal on the Development of New Versions\",\"authors\":\"A. Simakov, V. Klochkov, Y. Abramov\",\"doi\":\"10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-4-20-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this work is to improve the Russian Radiation Safety Standards (NRB) in terms of the interpretation of the meaning of “the main limit of the annual effective dose” and the use of the concept of “emergency”. In [1], proposals were submitted to discuss the changing in new versions of NRB and the Main Health Rules for Radiation Safety (OSPORB) in terms of the interpretation of the concept of “the limit of the annual effective dose of man-caused occupational exposure” and health physics regulation of radionuclide contents in solid materials for free or limited use of these materials. The current NRB-99/2009 uses the term “radiation accident” and establishes the main limits of effective dose (Table 3.1.) for personnel and the public: ‒ for the personnel A group, the annual dose limit is 50 mSv under the mandatory condition of not exceeding the average annual value of 20 mSv for any consecutive 5 years; ‒ for the public, the annual dose limit is 5 mSv under the mandatory condition of not exceeding the average annual value of 1 mSv for any consecutive 5 years. However, in design documentation for the construction and reconstruction of nuclear facilities, in draft regulatory and methodological documents, there are periodically misinterpretations of the main dose limits for personnel and the public and an incorrect interpretation of the term “radiation accident”. In many cases, a dose of 20 mSv is called the annual dose limit for personnel, and a dose of 50 mSv/year is either not mentioned at all, or is considered only as permissible in a radiation accident. The term “radiation accident” is often treated as a synonym for “emergency”. The paper justifies the expediency of introducing relevant changes to the text of new NRB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-4-20-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33266/1024-6177-2023-68-4-20-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目的是在解释“年度有效剂量的主要限制”的含义和使用“紧急情况”概念方面改进俄罗斯辐射安全标准。在[1]中,提交了关于讨论新版NRB和辐射安全主要健康规则(OSPORB)在解释“人为职业暴露的年有效剂量限值”概念和免费或有限使用固体材料中放射性核素含量的健康物理法规方面的变化的提案。目前的NRB-99/2009使用了“辐射事故”一词,并为人员和公众制定了有效剂量的主要限值(表3.1):对于人员A组,在任何连续5年不超过20 mSv的年平均值的强制性条件下,年剂量限值为50 mSv对于公众来说,在任何连续5年不超过1 mSv的年平均值的强制性条件下,年剂量限制为5 mSv。然而,在核设施建设和重建的设计文件中,在规章和方法文件草案中,对人员和公众的主要剂量限值存在周期性的误解,对“辐射事故”一词的解释也不正确。在许多情况下,20 mSv的剂量被称为人员的年度剂量限制,50 mSv/年的剂量要么根本没有提及,要么只被认为是辐射事故中允许的。“辐射事故”一词通常被视为“紧急情况”的同义词。本文证明了对新的NRB文本进行相关修改的权宜之计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiation Safety Standards and Basic Health Rules for Radiation Safety: Proposal on the Development of New Versions
The purpose of this work is to improve the Russian Radiation Safety Standards (NRB) in terms of the interpretation of the meaning of “the main limit of the annual effective dose” and the use of the concept of “emergency”. In [1], proposals were submitted to discuss the changing in new versions of NRB and the Main Health Rules for Radiation Safety (OSPORB) in terms of the interpretation of the concept of “the limit of the annual effective dose of man-caused occupational exposure” and health physics regulation of radionuclide contents in solid materials for free or limited use of these materials. The current NRB-99/2009 uses the term “radiation accident” and establishes the main limits of effective dose (Table 3.1.) for personnel and the public: ‒ for the personnel A group, the annual dose limit is 50 mSv under the mandatory condition of not exceeding the average annual value of 20 mSv for any consecutive 5 years; ‒ for the public, the annual dose limit is 5 mSv under the mandatory condition of not exceeding the average annual value of 1 mSv for any consecutive 5 years. However, in design documentation for the construction and reconstruction of nuclear facilities, in draft regulatory and methodological documents, there are periodically misinterpretations of the main dose limits for personnel and the public and an incorrect interpretation of the term “radiation accident”. In many cases, a dose of 20 mSv is called the annual dose limit for personnel, and a dose of 50 mSv/year is either not mentioned at all, or is considered only as permissible in a radiation accident. The term “radiation accident” is often treated as a synonym for “emergency”. The paper justifies the expediency of introducing relevant changes to the text of new NRB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety
Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Radiation Risk of Death from Cardiovascular Diseases among the Liquidators Involved in the Cleaning up of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident – Workers in the Nuclear Industry Sector The Mitochondrial 18 kDa Translocator Protein as a Biomarker of Radiation-Induced Neuroinflammatory In Memory of Radiotoxicologist Yuri Alexandrovich Klassovsky for the 100th Anniversary of his Birth on 01/15/1924–04/27/1982 The Importance of SPECT/CT in Simultaneous Assessment of Calcinosis of Coronary Arteries, Perfusion and Contractile Function of the Myocardium among Men’s with Coronary Heart Disease Study of Clinical, Hematologic and Immunologic Parameters in Assessing the Anti-Radiation Efficacy of the Therapeutic Agent Based on the Microorganism Fusobacterium Necrophorum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1