最高法院,2020年7月7日,rol N°8.214-2018

Javier Rodríguez Díez
{"title":"最高法院,2020年7月7日,rol N°8.214-2018","authors":"Javier Rodríguez Díez","doi":"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work analyses a recent decision which limits the lessor’s obligation to deliver to the physical availability of goods that match the agreed description and specifications, notwithstanding the fact that the goods presents from the outset such defects that make its use by the lessee impossible. Such outcome contrasts with the legal opinions and case law of the last years, which often grant a broad interpretation of the obligations of the lessor regarding defects of leased goods. Nonetheless, the decision offers elements which allow to determine in which cases the lessee deserves a protection that goes beyond the literal terms of the contract.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":"1 1","pages":"239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defectos en la cosa arrendada que imposibilitan el goce Corte Suprema, 7 de julio de 2020, rol N° 8.214-2018\",\"authors\":\"Javier Rodríguez Díez\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work analyses a recent decision which limits the lessor’s obligation to deliver to the physical availability of goods that match the agreed description and specifications, notwithstanding the fact that the goods presents from the outset such defects that make its use by the lessee impossible. Such outcome contrasts with the legal opinions and case law of the last years, which often grant a broad interpretation of the obligations of the lessor regarding defects of leased goods. Nonetheless, the decision offers elements which allow to determine in which cases the lessee deserves a protection that goes beyond the literal terms of the contract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"239-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作分析了最近的一项决定,该决定将出租人的交付义务限制在符合约定描述和规格的货物的实际可用性,尽管货物从一开始就存在使承租人无法使用的缺陷。这一结果与过去几年的法律意见和判例法形成了鲜明对比,后者通常对出租人在租赁货物缺陷方面的义务作出广泛解释。尽管如此,该决定提供了一些要素,可以确定在哪些情况下,承租人应该得到超越合同字面条款的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defectos en la cosa arrendada que imposibilitan el goce Corte Suprema, 7 de julio de 2020, rol N° 8.214-2018
This work analyses a recent decision which limits the lessor’s obligation to deliver to the physical availability of goods that match the agreed description and specifications, notwithstanding the fact that the goods presents from the outset such defects that make its use by the lessee impossible. Such outcome contrasts with the legal opinions and case law of the last years, which often grant a broad interpretation of the obligations of the lessor regarding defects of leased goods. Nonetheless, the decision offers elements which allow to determine in which cases the lessee deserves a protection that goes beyond the literal terms of the contract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
EL INTERÉS COMPROMETIDO EN LA DECLARACIÓN DE CLÁUSULAS ABUSIVAS COMO JUSTIFICANTE DE LA ACCIÓN POR EL INTERÉS GENERAL NO RENOVACIONES DE MATRÍCULAS DE NIÑOS, NIÑAS Y ADOLESCENTES CON TRASTORNO DE DÉFICIT ATENCIONAL E HIPERACTIVIDAD: UNO DE LOS PROBLEMAS QUE DEBE RESOLVER una educación verdaderamente inclusiva APLICACIÓN DE LAS NORMAS CONTENIDAS EN LA LEY N.º 19496 A COMUNICACIONES DE NATURALEZA PUBLICITARIA EMITIDAS POR LÍDERES DE OPINIÓN O INFLUENCERS EL LITIGANTE APARENTE EN EL CÓDIGO DE ÉTICA PROFESIONAL DEL COLEGIO DE ABOGADOS DE CHILE A.G. LA CLÁUSULA “SE FACULTA AL PORTADOR” COMO MANDATO INNOMINADO QUE TERMINA CON LA MUERTE DEL COMPRADOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1