美学在建筑可持续性评估中的作用

Q1 Arts and Humanities Spatium Pub Date : 2021-07-02 DOI:10.2298/spat2145079g
I. Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, Gediminas Viliunas, Aurelija Daugėlaitė
{"title":"美学在建筑可持续性评估中的作用","authors":"I. Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, Gediminas Viliunas, Aurelija Daugėlaitė","doi":"10.2298/spat2145079g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theoretical study examines the role of aesthetics in the assessment\n frameworks of sustainable architecture. The article is organized into two\n main sections: a general literature review and the results. The results\n section encompasses an analysis of the place of aesthetic quality in the\n understanding of sustainable architecture, and an overview and discussion of\n the general sustainable building assessment frameworks and the main\n sustainable buildings certification systems (LEED, BREEAM, WELL, Living\n Building Challenge), identifying the existing and potential place of\n cultural sustainability and aesthetics in them. Finally, four architectural\n theories holding the potential for balancing human and environmental\n criteria in the assessment of sustainable architecture are presented. These\n theories are: sustainability aesthetics, genius loci, biophilia, and a\n regenerative approach. The conclusion was made that these approaches hold\n the potential for the breakthrough of aesthetic quality and uniqueness of\n sustainable architecture.","PeriodicalId":38713,"journal":{"name":"Spatium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of aesthetics in building sustainability assessment\",\"authors\":\"I. Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, Gediminas Viliunas, Aurelija Daugėlaitė\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/spat2145079g\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This theoretical study examines the role of aesthetics in the assessment\\n frameworks of sustainable architecture. The article is organized into two\\n main sections: a general literature review and the results. The results\\n section encompasses an analysis of the place of aesthetic quality in the\\n understanding of sustainable architecture, and an overview and discussion of\\n the general sustainable building assessment frameworks and the main\\n sustainable buildings certification systems (LEED, BREEAM, WELL, Living\\n Building Challenge), identifying the existing and potential place of\\n cultural sustainability and aesthetics in them. Finally, four architectural\\n theories holding the potential for balancing human and environmental\\n criteria in the assessment of sustainable architecture are presented. These\\n theories are: sustainability aesthetics, genius loci, biophilia, and a\\n regenerative approach. The conclusion was made that these approaches hold\\n the potential for the breakthrough of aesthetic quality and uniqueness of\\n sustainable architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spatium\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spatium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/spat2145079g\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/spat2145079g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本理论研究考察了美学在可持续建筑评估框架中的作用。本文分为两个主要部分:一般文献综述和结果。结果部分包括对审美质量在可持续建筑理解中的地位的分析,以及对一般可持续建筑评估框架和主要可持续建筑认证系统(LEED, BREEAM, WELL, Living building Challenge)的概述和讨论,确定文化可持续性和美学在其中的现有和潜在地位。最后,提出了在可持续建筑评估中平衡人类和环境标准的四种建筑理论。这些理论是:可持续性美学、天才位点、亲生命和再生方法。结论是,这些方法具有突破可持续建筑美学品质和独特性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of aesthetics in building sustainability assessment
This theoretical study examines the role of aesthetics in the assessment frameworks of sustainable architecture. The article is organized into two main sections: a general literature review and the results. The results section encompasses an analysis of the place of aesthetic quality in the understanding of sustainable architecture, and an overview and discussion of the general sustainable building assessment frameworks and the main sustainable buildings certification systems (LEED, BREEAM, WELL, Living Building Challenge), identifying the existing and potential place of cultural sustainability and aesthetics in them. Finally, four architectural theories holding the potential for balancing human and environmental criteria in the assessment of sustainable architecture are presented. These theories are: sustainability aesthetics, genius loci, biophilia, and a regenerative approach. The conclusion was made that these approaches hold the potential for the breakthrough of aesthetic quality and uniqueness of sustainable architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spatium
Spatium Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The first community housing model constructed in Hungary - the collective house in Miskolc Credibility of legalization: Illegally constructed buildings in Serbia Rethinking soviet era mass housing in Kazakhstan Are we discriminating towards guests with disabilities? Accessibility analyses of public restaurants facilities in the Republic of Slovenia The impact of energy improvement measures in single-family residential buildings on air pollution in the city of Uzice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1