国家医疗保健改善倡议第四次评估的主要发现

Jing Sun, F. Jiang, Linlin Hu, Yu Jiang, Jing Ma, Li Luo, Y. Mao, Guo Zhang, Jinliang Hu, Bingjie Shen, Yinuo Wu, Peiwen Zhang, Jialin Ji, Ran Guo, Meicen Liu, Shichao Wu, Shiyang Liu, Zijuan Wang, Yuanli Liu
{"title":"国家医疗保健改善倡议第四次评估的主要发现","authors":"Jing Sun, F. Jiang, Linlin Hu, Yu Jiang, Jing Ma, Li Luo, Y. Mao, Guo Zhang, Jinliang Hu, Bingjie Shen, Yinuo Wu, Peiwen Zhang, Jialin Ji, Ran Guo, Meicen Liu, Shichao Wu, Shiyang Liu, Zijuan Wang, Yuanli Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo carry out the 4th round of third-party evaluation on the implementation and effect of the 1st year of the 2nd Phase National Healthcare Improvement Initiative(abbreviated as Initiative)since 2015. \n \n \nMethods \nThe 4th round of the evaluation survey adopted the same methods, organization and execution, and technical roadmap as the former three rounds of evaluations. \n \n \nResults \nThe 4th round of evaluation was carried out from 18 March to 9 April, 2019 at 185 public hospitals in 31 provinces(autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government)and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.Facility survey, health professional survey and patient survey were conducted at each of the sample health facilities. A total of 120 782 valid questionnaires were collected from 144 non-psychiatric health facilities, 16 246 valid questionnaires were obtained from 41 psychiatric health facilities, and 252 cases of outstanding departments/hospitals in healthcare improvement were also collected. The average overall scoring of the 12 dimensions to assess Initiative implementation at 144 non-psychiatric health facilities was 84.4%. The overall outpatient satisfaction scoring was 91.1%, 96.7%for the inpatients. The overall inpatient satisfaction(family members inclusive) at 41 psychiatric health facilities was 93%. Areas remaining to be improved include day-surgery, telemedicine and medical social work. Compared with technical services, non-technical care should be further strengthened. The compensation, workload and work environment of the healthcare providers are still to be improved. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe implementation of the Initiative by health facilities has been greatly improved. The percentage of health facilities and patients who had positive perceptions of improved doctor-patient relationship has been increasing. Patient care experiences at public hospitals have been generally improved, and the implementation of promoting traditional Chinese Medicine practices also made progress. However, work satisfaction of healthcare providers was found to be rather low, compared to the high level of patient satisfaction. \n \n \nKey words: \nHealthcare Improvement Initiative; Third party evaluation; Hospital Survey; Doctor-patient satisfaction","PeriodicalId":56974,"journal":{"name":"中华医院管理杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"705-711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Major findings from the 4th Evaluation of the National Healthcare Improvement Initiative\",\"authors\":\"Jing Sun, F. Jiang, Linlin Hu, Yu Jiang, Jing Ma, Li Luo, Y. Mao, Guo Zhang, Jinliang Hu, Bingjie Shen, Yinuo Wu, Peiwen Zhang, Jialin Ji, Ran Guo, Meicen Liu, Shichao Wu, Shiyang Liu, Zijuan Wang, Yuanli Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo carry out the 4th round of third-party evaluation on the implementation and effect of the 1st year of the 2nd Phase National Healthcare Improvement Initiative(abbreviated as Initiative)since 2015. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe 4th round of the evaluation survey adopted the same methods, organization and execution, and technical roadmap as the former three rounds of evaluations. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe 4th round of evaluation was carried out from 18 March to 9 April, 2019 at 185 public hospitals in 31 provinces(autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government)and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.Facility survey, health professional survey and patient survey were conducted at each of the sample health facilities. A total of 120 782 valid questionnaires were collected from 144 non-psychiatric health facilities, 16 246 valid questionnaires were obtained from 41 psychiatric health facilities, and 252 cases of outstanding departments/hospitals in healthcare improvement were also collected. The average overall scoring of the 12 dimensions to assess Initiative implementation at 144 non-psychiatric health facilities was 84.4%. The overall outpatient satisfaction scoring was 91.1%, 96.7%for the inpatients. The overall inpatient satisfaction(family members inclusive) at 41 psychiatric health facilities was 93%. Areas remaining to be improved include day-surgery, telemedicine and medical social work. Compared with technical services, non-technical care should be further strengthened. The compensation, workload and work environment of the healthcare providers are still to be improved. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe implementation of the Initiative by health facilities has been greatly improved. The percentage of health facilities and patients who had positive perceptions of improved doctor-patient relationship has been increasing. Patient care experiences at public hospitals have been generally improved, and the implementation of promoting traditional Chinese Medicine practices also made progress. However, work satisfaction of healthcare providers was found to be rather low, compared to the high level of patient satisfaction. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nHealthcare Improvement Initiative; Third party evaluation; Hospital Survey; Doctor-patient satisfaction\",\"PeriodicalId\":56974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医院管理杂志\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"705-711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医院管理杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医院管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6672.2019.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对2015年以来国家卫生健康改善二期行动计划(简称“行动计划”)第一年实施情况及效果进行第四轮第三方评估。方法第四轮评价调查采用与前三轮评价相同的方法、组织执行和技术路线。结果于2019年3月18日至4月9日对31个省(区、市)和新疆生产建设兵团的185家公立医院进行了第4轮评估。在每个抽样卫生机构进行了设施调查、卫生专业人员调查和患者调查。从144家非精神卫生机构共收集有效问卷120 782份,从41家精神卫生机构共收集有效问卷16 246份,并收集卫生保健改善突出科室/医院案例252份。144家非精神病保健机构评估倡议执行情况的12个方面的平均总得分为84.4%。门诊患者总体满意度为91.1%,住院患者满意度为96.7%。41家精神卫生机构的总体住院病人满意度(包括家庭成员)为93%。有待改进的领域包括日间手术、远程医疗和医务社会工作。与技术服务相比,非技术关怀应进一步加强。医疗保健提供者的薪酬、工作量和工作环境仍有待改善。结论卫生机构对《倡议》的执行情况有了很大改善。对医患关系改善持积极看法的卫生机构和患者的百分比一直在增加。公立医院病人护理水平普遍提高,中医药推广工作取得进展。然而,与患者的高满意度相比,医疗保健提供者的工作满意度相当低。关键词:医疗保健改善倡议;第三方评估;医院调查;医患满意度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Major findings from the 4th Evaluation of the National Healthcare Improvement Initiative
Objective To carry out the 4th round of third-party evaluation on the implementation and effect of the 1st year of the 2nd Phase National Healthcare Improvement Initiative(abbreviated as Initiative)since 2015. Methods The 4th round of the evaluation survey adopted the same methods, organization and execution, and technical roadmap as the former three rounds of evaluations. Results The 4th round of evaluation was carried out from 18 March to 9 April, 2019 at 185 public hospitals in 31 provinces(autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government)and Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.Facility survey, health professional survey and patient survey were conducted at each of the sample health facilities. A total of 120 782 valid questionnaires were collected from 144 non-psychiatric health facilities, 16 246 valid questionnaires were obtained from 41 psychiatric health facilities, and 252 cases of outstanding departments/hospitals in healthcare improvement were also collected. The average overall scoring of the 12 dimensions to assess Initiative implementation at 144 non-psychiatric health facilities was 84.4%. The overall outpatient satisfaction scoring was 91.1%, 96.7%for the inpatients. The overall inpatient satisfaction(family members inclusive) at 41 psychiatric health facilities was 93%. Areas remaining to be improved include day-surgery, telemedicine and medical social work. Compared with technical services, non-technical care should be further strengthened. The compensation, workload and work environment of the healthcare providers are still to be improved. Conclusions The implementation of the Initiative by health facilities has been greatly improved. The percentage of health facilities and patients who had positive perceptions of improved doctor-patient relationship has been increasing. Patient care experiences at public hospitals have been generally improved, and the implementation of promoting traditional Chinese Medicine practices also made progress. However, work satisfaction of healthcare providers was found to be rather low, compared to the high level of patient satisfaction. Key words: Healthcare Improvement Initiative; Third party evaluation; Hospital Survey; Doctor-patient satisfaction
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9658
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Management practice for critical COVID-19 patients rescue in designated hospitals Exploration and practice: operation mode of a united medical team cooperation in designated hospitals for treating severe COVID-19 patients Pharmaceutical administration practice during prevention and treatment of COVID-19 The thinking on improving the construction of the national treatment system for major infectious diseases and the emergency response mechanism Characteristics and practice management of intensive care for patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1