帝王mitografia神话和历史的年龄:基团πολέμαρχος(Apollod。Bibl。(41)

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS Emerita Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI:10.3989/emerita.2019.13.1915
Stefano Acerbo
{"title":"帝王mitografia神话和历史的年龄:基团πολέμαρχος(Apollod。Bibl。(41)","authors":"Stefano Acerbo","doi":"10.3989/emerita.2019.13.1915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The way Lycus conquers power over Thebes in Pseudo-Apollodorus’ Library is marked by some elements that seem to refer to political institutions. His election as a polemarch may allude to events that took place in Boeotia in the fourth century B.C. This allusion represents a clear anachronism against the background of the mythographer’s tales. The anachronism is related to the narrative development of the section to which it belongs: the reference to polemarchy, by stressing the difference between the legitimate sovereignty of the Cadmeians and the illegitimate sovereignty of Lycus, Zethus and Amphion, contributes to the compositional plan conceived by ps. Apollodorus, which consists of genealogical continuity. Therefore, the anachronism can be considered as the result of a choice of the author and reveals that the mythographers played also a role in the iteration between mythical time and historical past that we can find in their works.","PeriodicalId":11579,"journal":{"name":"Emerita","volume":"87 1","pages":"285-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mito e storia nella mitografia di età imperiale: Lico πολέμαρχος (Apollod., Bibl. III 41)\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Acerbo\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/emerita.2019.13.1915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The way Lycus conquers power over Thebes in Pseudo-Apollodorus’ Library is marked by some elements that seem to refer to political institutions. His election as a polemarch may allude to events that took place in Boeotia in the fourth century B.C. This allusion represents a clear anachronism against the background of the mythographer’s tales. The anachronism is related to the narrative development of the section to which it belongs: the reference to polemarchy, by stressing the difference between the legitimate sovereignty of the Cadmeians and the illegitimate sovereignty of Lycus, Zethus and Amphion, contributes to the compositional plan conceived by ps. Apollodorus, which consists of genealogical continuity. Therefore, the anachronism can be considered as the result of a choice of the author and reveals that the mythographers played also a role in the iteration between mythical time and historical past that we can find in their works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerita\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"285-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2019.13.1915\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2019.13.1915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在伪apollodorus的图书馆中,Lycus征服底比斯的方式被一些似乎与政治制度有关的元素所标记。他被选为辩论家可能暗指发生在公元前4世纪的波奥提亚事件。这个暗指与这位神话作者的故事背景相比,明显是时代错误。时代错误与其所属部分的叙事发展有关:通过强调卡德米亚人的合法主权与莱科斯、泽thus和安菲翁的非法主权之间的区别,对polemarchy的提及有助于ps. Apollodorus构想的构成计划,该计划包括家谱的连续性。因此,时代错误可以被认为是作者选择的结果,并揭示了神话作者在神话时间与历史过去之间的迭代中也发挥了作用,我们可以在他们的作品中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mito e storia nella mitografia di età imperiale: Lico πολέμαρχος (Apollod., Bibl. III 41)
The way Lycus conquers power over Thebes in Pseudo-Apollodorus’ Library is marked by some elements that seem to refer to political institutions. His election as a polemarch may allude to events that took place in Boeotia in the fourth century B.C. This allusion represents a clear anachronism against the background of the mythographer’s tales. The anachronism is related to the narrative development of the section to which it belongs: the reference to polemarchy, by stressing the difference between the legitimate sovereignty of the Cadmeians and the illegitimate sovereignty of Lycus, Zethus and Amphion, contributes to the compositional plan conceived by ps. Apollodorus, which consists of genealogical continuity. Therefore, the anachronism can be considered as the result of a choice of the author and reveals that the mythographers played also a role in the iteration between mythical time and historical past that we can find in their works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emerita
Emerita CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1933 by D. Ramón Menéndez Pidal, EMERITA publishes two issues per year, about 400 pages of articles and reviews concerning Classical Philology, Greek, Latin, Indoeuropean and Iberian Linguistics and Ancient History. EMERITA is, since its foundation, one of the best known and valued high level scientific Journals in its field.
期刊最新文献
Apuntes histórico-filológicos sobre la introducción de una carta del emperador Honorio al ejército (Epistula Honorii) Quem colam βασιλέα: paralelos entre Apuleyo y el hermetismo Ramón Menéndez Pidal, Giuliano Bonfante y el nacimiento de la Sección de Estudios Clásicos del CEH Notas filológicas sobre la letra alfa en un nuevo diccionario etimológico del griego, con especial atención al material de Hesiquio Giasone ‘oplita’ ἀμήχανος (A. R. IV 190-205)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1