以用户为中心的措施在非药物干预(NPI)使用中的作用

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Social Marketing Pub Date : 2022-08-12 DOI:10.1108/jsocm-04-2022-0071
Matti J. Haverila, Kai C. Haverila, Caitlin McLaughlin
{"title":"以用户为中心的措施在非药物干预(NPI)使用中的作用","authors":"Matti J. Haverila, Kai C. Haverila, Caitlin McLaughlin","doi":"10.1108/jsocm-04-2022-0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nHealth authorities have introduced non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) with the aim of reducing the spread of viruses. Against the backdrop of social marketing, normative and utility theories, the purpose of the paper is to examine the relationships between user centric measures such as perceived effectiveness, user satisfaction, and value for effort on intentions to continue to use NPIs. Furthermore, the moderating role of value for effort on user satisfaction and, subsequently, intentions to continue to use NPIs was also considered.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA cross-sectional online survey was completed in British Columbia, Canada (N = 287). Analysis was done with partial least squares structural equation modeling.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that the relationships between user centric measures are positive and significant on intentions to continue to use NPIs. Furthermore, value for effort moderated the relationship between user satisfaction and intentions to continue to use NPIs – but the relationship was negative. Thus, the higher values of the value for effort construct cause the relationship between user satisfaction and reuse intention to somewhat diminish.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results confirm the positive and significant relationships between user centric measures in the context of the use of NPIs and introduce a new understanding of the effect of value for effort on the relationship between user satisfaction and intentions to use NPIs. This enables health officials to better understand how to encourage the use of NPIs.\n","PeriodicalId":51732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of user centric measures in the use of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs)\",\"authors\":\"Matti J. Haverila, Kai C. Haverila, Caitlin McLaughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jsocm-04-2022-0071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nHealth authorities have introduced non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) with the aim of reducing the spread of viruses. Against the backdrop of social marketing, normative and utility theories, the purpose of the paper is to examine the relationships between user centric measures such as perceived effectiveness, user satisfaction, and value for effort on intentions to continue to use NPIs. Furthermore, the moderating role of value for effort on user satisfaction and, subsequently, intentions to continue to use NPIs was also considered.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA cross-sectional online survey was completed in British Columbia, Canada (N = 287). Analysis was done with partial least squares structural equation modeling.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results show that the relationships between user centric measures are positive and significant on intentions to continue to use NPIs. Furthermore, value for effort moderated the relationship between user satisfaction and intentions to continue to use NPIs – but the relationship was negative. Thus, the higher values of the value for effort construct cause the relationship between user satisfaction and reuse intention to somewhat diminish.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe results confirm the positive and significant relationships between user centric measures in the context of the use of NPIs and introduce a new understanding of the effect of value for effort on the relationship between user satisfaction and intentions to use NPIs. This enables health officials to better understand how to encourage the use of NPIs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-04-2022-0071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-04-2022-0071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的卫生当局引入了非药物干预措施,旨在减少病毒的传播。在社会营销、规范和效用理论的背景下,本文的目的是检验以用户为中心的衡量标准之间的关系,如感知有效性、用户满意度和继续使用NPI的努力价值。此外,还考虑了努力的价值对用户满意度的调节作用,以及随后继续使用NPI的意图。设计/方法/方法在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省完成了一项横断面在线调查(N=287)。分析采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型。结果表明,以用户为中心的措施之间的关系是积极的,对继续使用NPI的意图具有显著意义。此外,努力的价值调节了用户满意度和继续使用NPI的意图之间的关系,但这种关系是负面的。因此,努力值结构的较高值会导致用户满意度和重用意图之间的关系有所减弱。原创性/价值研究结果证实了在使用NPI的背景下,以用户为中心的措施之间存在积极而显著的关系,并引入了对努力价值对用户满意度和使用NPI意图之间关系的影响的新理解。这使卫生官员能够更好地了解如何鼓励使用NPI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of user centric measures in the use of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs)
Purpose Health authorities have introduced non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) with the aim of reducing the spread of viruses. Against the backdrop of social marketing, normative and utility theories, the purpose of the paper is to examine the relationships between user centric measures such as perceived effectiveness, user satisfaction, and value for effort on intentions to continue to use NPIs. Furthermore, the moderating role of value for effort on user satisfaction and, subsequently, intentions to continue to use NPIs was also considered. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional online survey was completed in British Columbia, Canada (N = 287). Analysis was done with partial least squares structural equation modeling. Findings The results show that the relationships between user centric measures are positive and significant on intentions to continue to use NPIs. Furthermore, value for effort moderated the relationship between user satisfaction and intentions to continue to use NPIs – but the relationship was negative. Thus, the higher values of the value for effort construct cause the relationship between user satisfaction and reuse intention to somewhat diminish. Originality/value The results confirm the positive and significant relationships between user centric measures in the context of the use of NPIs and introduce a new understanding of the effect of value for effort on the relationship between user satisfaction and intentions to use NPIs. This enables health officials to better understand how to encourage the use of NPIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
29.20%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Reducing food waste through persuasive communication design: how data visualisation principles reinforce behaviour change social marketing messages Recognising motivation in others: the effectiveness of using social proof to change driving behaviour Developing a local behaviour change intervention for increased biowaste sorting: a social marketing formative study An inclusive extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior for explaining household food leftover reduction intention among Gen Z What drives women to adopt menstrual cups? The integration of consumer values and theory of planned behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1