教师绩效评估的主要增长:来自学生评价教学调查的证据

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Tuning Journal for Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.18543/tjhe.2299
Jaime Prieto, Rocío Guede-Cid, Ana I. Cid-Cid, Santiago Leguey
{"title":"教师绩效评估的主要增长:来自学生评价教学调查的证据","authors":"Jaime Prieto, Rocío Guede-Cid, Ana I. Cid-Cid, Santiago Leguey","doi":"10.18543/tjhe.2299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This exploratory study examined major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations and their immediate impact on next year’s score for those instructors that taught the same subject for at least two years in a row. The purpose was twofold. Firstly, to identify those Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) survey items associated with major increases in teacher evaluations. Secondly, to examine if there is evidence of the use of these SET results by instructors to improve their teaching.Design: The sample comprised SET survey ratings from one university over a five consecutive year period, for a total sample of 13,052 teacher evaluations and 3,893 teachers-subject observations under analysis. Frequency tables and Student’s t-test were used for analysis.Findings: The results highlighted the three SET survey items captured by the dimension of teaching methodology as those most closely related to major increases in teacher evaluations. Regarding the second objective, the results show no generalised response from teachers who experience major increases in SET ratings. This suggests that the use of SET results is either limited or does not have an immediate measurable effect on student satisfaction.Originality/Value: To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to specifically examine major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations and their immediate impact on next year’s score based on evidence from SET surveys. \nReceived: 22 December 2021Accepted: 26 February 2023","PeriodicalId":53788,"journal":{"name":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations: Evidence from student evaluation of teaching surveys\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Prieto, Rocío Guede-Cid, Ana I. Cid-Cid, Santiago Leguey\",\"doi\":\"10.18543/tjhe.2299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This exploratory study examined major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations and their immediate impact on next year’s score for those instructors that taught the same subject for at least two years in a row. The purpose was twofold. Firstly, to identify those Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) survey items associated with major increases in teacher evaluations. Secondly, to examine if there is evidence of the use of these SET results by instructors to improve their teaching.Design: The sample comprised SET survey ratings from one university over a five consecutive year period, for a total sample of 13,052 teacher evaluations and 3,893 teachers-subject observations under analysis. Frequency tables and Student’s t-test were used for analysis.Findings: The results highlighted the three SET survey items captured by the dimension of teaching methodology as those most closely related to major increases in teacher evaluations. Regarding the second objective, the results show no generalised response from teachers who experience major increases in SET ratings. This suggests that the use of SET results is either limited or does not have an immediate measurable effect on student satisfaction.Originality/Value: To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to specifically examine major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations and their immediate impact on next year’s score based on evidence from SET surveys. \\nReceived: 22 December 2021Accepted: 26 February 2023\",\"PeriodicalId\":53788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuning Journal for Higher Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuning Journal for Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuning Journal for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本探索性研究考察了教师绩效评估的主要增长及其对那些连续至少两年教授同一学科的教师明年分数的直接影响。目的是双重的。首先,确定与教师评价主要增长相关的学生教学评价(SET)调查项目。其次,检查是否有证据表明教师使用这些SET结果来改进他们的教学。设计:样本包括一所大学连续五年的SET调查评分,总共有13052份教师评估和3893份教师观察结果进行分析。使用频率表和学生t检验进行分析。发现:结果突出了教学方法维度捕获的三个SET调查项目,这些项目与教师评估的主要增长最密切相关。关于第二个目标,结果显示,经历了SET评分大幅提高的教师没有普遍的反应。这表明,SET结果的使用要么是有限的,要么对学生满意度没有直接可衡量的影响。原创性/价值:据我们所知,这是第一个根据SET调查的证据,专门研究教师绩效评估的主要增长及其对明年分数的直接影响的研究。收稿日期:2021年12月22日接收日期:2023年2月26日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations: Evidence from student evaluation of teaching surveys
Purpose: This exploratory study examined major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations and their immediate impact on next year’s score for those instructors that taught the same subject for at least two years in a row. The purpose was twofold. Firstly, to identify those Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) survey items associated with major increases in teacher evaluations. Secondly, to examine if there is evidence of the use of these SET results by instructors to improve their teaching.Design: The sample comprised SET survey ratings from one university over a five consecutive year period, for a total sample of 13,052 teacher evaluations and 3,893 teachers-subject observations under analysis. Frequency tables and Student’s t-test were used for analysis.Findings: The results highlighted the three SET survey items captured by the dimension of teaching methodology as those most closely related to major increases in teacher evaluations. Regarding the second objective, the results show no generalised response from teachers who experience major increases in SET ratings. This suggests that the use of SET results is either limited or does not have an immediate measurable effect on student satisfaction.Originality/Value: To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to specifically examine major increases in teachers’ performance evaluations and their immediate impact on next year’s score based on evidence from SET surveys. Received: 22 December 2021Accepted: 26 February 2023
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tuning Journal for Higher Education
Tuning Journal for Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Emerging strategies and challenges faced by professors during Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) at a Colombian university The effects of online learning self-efficacy and attitude toward online learning in predicting academic performance: The case of online prospective mathematics teachers Teaching in a COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions and practices of university faculty in Spain The early years The impact of an active-learning designed faculty development program: A students’ perspective of an Italian university
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1