区域镇痛技术在泌尿外科机器人手术中的疗效:回顾性临床研究

Sami Kaan Coşarcan, A. T. Doğan, M. Kılıç, Ö. Erçelen
{"title":"区域镇痛技术在泌尿外科机器人手术中的疗效:回顾性临床研究","authors":"Sami Kaan Coşarcan, A. T. Doğan, M. Kılıç, Ö. Erçelen","doi":"10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1141735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The advantages of robot-assisted surgery include shorter incisions, less postoperative pain, perioperative blood loss, and a faster return to daily functions. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) provides highly satisfactory analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, its hypotensive effect, particularly in minimally invasive procedures, exceeds its contribution to rapid recovery. Fascial plane blocks may be more beneficial in that context. This study evaluated the effects of regional analgesia techniques in robotic prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy operations. Material and Methods: Following IRB Ethics Committee approval (2021.467.IRB1.134), the records of patients who had undergone robotic prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy surgeries were retrospectively reviewed between January 2018 and January 2022.  Results: One hundred and forty patients with full documentation were included in this study. Various regional analgesia methods were used. Fascial plane blocks were seen to be used in addition to epidural analgesia. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath blocks exhibited satisfactory results in robotic prostate surgeries and TAP blocks in robotic nephrectomy operations. Conclusion: In robotic prostatectomy and nephrectomy operations, we recommend fascial plane blocks as the first-choice method for postoperative analgesia. Keywords: regional anesthesia, robotic surgery, radical prostatectomy, minimally invasive surgery, fascial plane blocks, recovery after surgery","PeriodicalId":33828,"journal":{"name":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of regional analgesia techniques in urological robotic surgeries: a retrospective clinical study\",\"authors\":\"Sami Kaan Coşarcan, A. T. Doğan, M. Kılıç, Ö. Erçelen\",\"doi\":\"10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1141735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The advantages of robot-assisted surgery include shorter incisions, less postoperative pain, perioperative blood loss, and a faster return to daily functions. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) provides highly satisfactory analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, its hypotensive effect, particularly in minimally invasive procedures, exceeds its contribution to rapid recovery. Fascial plane blocks may be more beneficial in that context. This study evaluated the effects of regional analgesia techniques in robotic prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy operations. Material and Methods: Following IRB Ethics Committee approval (2021.467.IRB1.134), the records of patients who had undergone robotic prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy surgeries were retrospectively reviewed between January 2018 and January 2022.  Results: One hundred and forty patients with full documentation were included in this study. Various regional analgesia methods were used. Fascial plane blocks were seen to be used in addition to epidural analgesia. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath blocks exhibited satisfactory results in robotic prostate surgeries and TAP blocks in robotic nephrectomy operations. Conclusion: In robotic prostatectomy and nephrectomy operations, we recommend fascial plane blocks as the first-choice method for postoperative analgesia. Keywords: regional anesthesia, robotic surgery, radical prostatectomy, minimally invasive surgery, fascial plane blocks, recovery after surgery\",\"PeriodicalId\":33828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1141735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni Uroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.2022;17-3-1141735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机器人辅助手术的优点包括切口更短,术后疼痛更少,围手术期出血,更快地恢复日常功能。胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)在腹部手术中提供了令人满意的镇痛效果。然而,它的降压作用,特别是在微创手术中,超过了它对快速恢复的贡献。在这种情况下,筋膜平面块可能更有益。本研究评估了区域镇痛技术在机器人前列腺切除术、肾切除术和膀胱切除术中的效果。材料和方法:在IRB伦理委员会批准(2021.467.IRB1.134)后,对2018年1月至2022年1月期间接受机器人前列腺切除术、肾切除术和膀胱切除术的患者的记录进行了回顾性审查。结果:140名具有完整文件的患者被纳入本研究。采用了多种区域镇痛方法。除了硬膜外镇痛外,还可以使用筋膜平面阻滞。经腹平面(TAP)和直肌鞘阻滞在机器人前列腺手术中表现出令人满意的结果,而TAP阻滞在机器人肾切除术中表现出满意的结果。结论:在机器人前列腺切除术和肾切除术中,我们建议筋膜平面阻滞作为术后镇痛的首选方法。关键词:区域麻醉,机器人手术,前列腺根治术,微创手术,筋膜平面阻滞,术后恢复
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of regional analgesia techniques in urological robotic surgeries: a retrospective clinical study
Objective: The advantages of robot-assisted surgery include shorter incisions, less postoperative pain, perioperative blood loss, and a faster return to daily functions. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) provides highly satisfactory analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, its hypotensive effect, particularly in minimally invasive procedures, exceeds its contribution to rapid recovery. Fascial plane blocks may be more beneficial in that context. This study evaluated the effects of regional analgesia techniques in robotic prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy operations. Material and Methods: Following IRB Ethics Committee approval (2021.467.IRB1.134), the records of patients who had undergone robotic prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy surgeries were retrospectively reviewed between January 2018 and January 2022.  Results: One hundred and forty patients with full documentation were included in this study. Various regional analgesia methods were used. Fascial plane blocks were seen to be used in addition to epidural analgesia. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath blocks exhibited satisfactory results in robotic prostate surgeries and TAP blocks in robotic nephrectomy operations. Conclusion: In robotic prostatectomy and nephrectomy operations, we recommend fascial plane blocks as the first-choice method for postoperative analgesia. Keywords: regional anesthesia, robotic surgery, radical prostatectomy, minimally invasive surgery, fascial plane blocks, recovery after surgery
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Depth of Anesthesia Effect Clinical Results of Patients Who Underwent Radical Cystectomy in Accordance with Eras Protocols? The Effects of Viburnum Opulus L. on Kidneys of Rats with Ethylene Glycol-induced Nephrolithiasis Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients Who Use Intermittant SelfCatheterization by Themselves and by Their Caregivers Assessment of Hematological Parameters in the Diagnosis Brucella Epididymorchitis: Comparison of Brucella Epididymorchitis and Non-Brucella Epididymorchitis An Unusual Presentation of Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma in an HIV-Negative Patient with a Circumcised Penis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1