葡萄栽培机械化对工作时间和生产成本的影响

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY American Journal of Enology and Viticulture Pub Date : 2020-10-09 DOI:10.5344/ajev.2020.20027
L. Strub, A. Kurth, S. Loose
{"title":"葡萄栽培机械化对工作时间和生产成本的影响","authors":"L. Strub, A. Kurth, S. Loose","doi":"10.5344/ajev.2020.20027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to empirically estimate machine and labor costs for mechanization of viticultural processes and to assess the relative effect of mechanization options on viticultural costs. By identifying three external factors that determined the degree of optimal mechanization of three major viticultural processes, we developed a systematic typology of 12 unique vineyard types. To estimate the effects of the factors and processes on production costs, we analyzed the variance of more than 3400 single working time records of five German wine estates across three years with fixed and random effects. Mechanization of general viticultural processes, harvesting, and pruning strongly affected viticultural costs. Minimal pruning provided a cost savings potential of 58% for vineyards that permitted mechanized harvesting. Very steep slopes suffered significant cost disadvantages of up to 164% that could only partially be compensated by mechanization. We identified opportunities for wine producers to improve their economic profitability by increasing viticultural mechanization. The methodological framework developed can be applied to other wine regions with different cost settings and the analysis of big data sets from digitalization of viticulture. The results can aid wine producers and policymakers to choose cost-efficient viticultural systems and provide benchmarks to compare labor intensity.","PeriodicalId":7461,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","volume":"72 1","pages":"46 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5344/ajev.2020.20027","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Viticultural Mechanization on Working Time Requirements and Production Costs\",\"authors\":\"L. Strub, A. Kurth, S. Loose\",\"doi\":\"10.5344/ajev.2020.20027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to empirically estimate machine and labor costs for mechanization of viticultural processes and to assess the relative effect of mechanization options on viticultural costs. By identifying three external factors that determined the degree of optimal mechanization of three major viticultural processes, we developed a systematic typology of 12 unique vineyard types. To estimate the effects of the factors and processes on production costs, we analyzed the variance of more than 3400 single working time records of five German wine estates across three years with fixed and random effects. Mechanization of general viticultural processes, harvesting, and pruning strongly affected viticultural costs. Minimal pruning provided a cost savings potential of 58% for vineyards that permitted mechanized harvesting. Very steep slopes suffered significant cost disadvantages of up to 164% that could only partially be compensated by mechanization. We identified opportunities for wine producers to improve their economic profitability by increasing viticultural mechanization. The methodological framework developed can be applied to other wine regions with different cost settings and the analysis of big data sets from digitalization of viticulture. The results can aid wine producers and policymakers to choose cost-efficient viticultural systems and provide benchmarks to compare labor intensity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"46 - 55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5344/ajev.2020.20027\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2020.20027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2020.20027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

本研究的目的是实证估计葡萄栽培过程机械化的机器和劳动力成本,并评估机械化选择对葡萄栽培成本的相对影响。通过确定决定三个主要葡萄栽培过程最佳机械化程度的三个外部因素,我们开发了12个独特葡萄园类型的系统类型。为了评估因素和流程对生产成本的影响,我们分析了五个德国酒庄的3400多个单一工作时间记录在三年内的固定效应和随机效应的方差。一般葡萄栽培过程、收获和修剪的机械化强烈地影响了葡萄栽培成本。最小的修剪为允许机械化收获的葡萄园节省了58%的成本潜力。非常陡峭的斜坡承受着高达164%的成本劣势,机械化只能部分补偿。我们确定了葡萄酒生产商通过提高葡萄栽培机械化来提高经济盈利能力的机会。所开发的方法框架可以应用于其他具有不同成本设置的葡萄酒产区,并分析来自葡萄栽培数字化的大数据集。研究结果可以帮助葡萄酒生产商和政策制定者选择具有成本效益的葡萄栽培系统,并为比较劳动强度提供基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Viticultural Mechanization on Working Time Requirements and Production Costs
The purpose of this study was to empirically estimate machine and labor costs for mechanization of viticultural processes and to assess the relative effect of mechanization options on viticultural costs. By identifying three external factors that determined the degree of optimal mechanization of three major viticultural processes, we developed a systematic typology of 12 unique vineyard types. To estimate the effects of the factors and processes on production costs, we analyzed the variance of more than 3400 single working time records of five German wine estates across three years with fixed and random effects. Mechanization of general viticultural processes, harvesting, and pruning strongly affected viticultural costs. Minimal pruning provided a cost savings potential of 58% for vineyards that permitted mechanized harvesting. Very steep slopes suffered significant cost disadvantages of up to 164% that could only partially be compensated by mechanization. We identified opportunities for wine producers to improve their economic profitability by increasing viticultural mechanization. The methodological framework developed can be applied to other wine regions with different cost settings and the analysis of big data sets from digitalization of viticulture. The results can aid wine producers and policymakers to choose cost-efficient viticultural systems and provide benchmarks to compare labor intensity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 农林科学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (AJEV), published quarterly, is an official journal of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture (ASEV) and is the premier journal in the English language dedicated to scientific research on winemaking and grapegrowing. AJEV publishes full-length research papers, literature reviews, research notes, and technical briefs on various aspects of enology and viticulture, including wine chemistry, sensory science, process engineering, wine quality assessments, microbiology, methods development, plant pathogenesis, diseases and pests of grape, rootstock and clonal evaluation, effect of field practices, and grape genetics and breeding. All papers are peer reviewed, and authorship of papers is not limited to members of ASEV. The science editor, along with the viticulture, enology, and associate editors, are drawn from academic and research institutions worldwide and guide the content of the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Red Wine Fermentation Alters Grape Seed Morphology and Internal Porosity Phenological Stage and Tissue Type of Grapevines Impact Concentrations and Variability of Mineral Nutrients Machine-Learning Methods for the Identification of Key Predictors of Site-Specific Vineyard Yield and Vine Size Gibberellic Acid for Table Grape Inflorescence Elongation: Is It Worth It? Consumer Hedonic Testing and Chemical Analysis of Iowa Wines Made from Five Cold-Hardy Interspecific Grape Varieties (Vitisspp.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1