活的宗教、五旬节派和独裁智利的社会行动主义:赋予信仰生命

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal of Contemporary Religion Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.1080/13537903.2022.2062863
M. Lindhardt
{"title":"活的宗教、五旬节派和独裁智利的社会行动主义:赋予信仰生命","authors":"M. Lindhardt","doi":"10.1080/13537903.2022.2062863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"evangelicalism in the US. Bjork-James’s conversations with a range of evangelicals— leaders and followers, promoters, critics, loyalists, and dissenters—are set within their broader contexts in a way that means intersectional dimensions are illuminated in all their complexity. The emerging, careful disentangling of human relationships, their development and complex orientation to faith, morality, and social life makes for compelling reading and at numerous points its subtlety warns against the kneejerk, stereotypical claims often made about this controversial movement. At the same time, we do not lose sight of the power dynamics of White evangelicalism either. Here, Bjork-James’s study is especially revealing, covering familiar ground (e.g. the tendency to present God and government as mutually exclusive) while also pressing the analysis to expose more novel patterns revealed through thick descriptions of her fieldwork. A striking example is the chapter on same-sex attraction, which explores how evangelicals privilege certain forms of ‘sexual citizenship’ over others. While acknowledging a range of sins (and insisting they are not ranked in order of severity), in practice, same-sex relationships are subject to much more vitriol than any others, “as though sex is the fastest way out of God’s benign kingdom, and cultivating the correct—heterosexual and gendered—sexual identities and desires is a requirement for remaining in this ethical world” (92). Bjork-James exposes the power of this embedded configuration of sexual-social order, deployed as a basis for condemnation, social exclusion, and family breakdown. By contrast, a later chapter attends to cases of evangelicals who have developed a more critical perspective on the ‘familism’ that has become predominant in their movement, including younger generations whose experience has led to them embracing a “broadened ethical paradigm” (128). The examples here are especially inspiring. Some of the individuals Bjork-James encountered remained conservative in their beliefs and values about family and the Christian life, but their experiences meeting others who were different had fostered a different tone in their rhetoric, one based on mutual respect, courtesy, and an openness to new knowledge. It is in throwing light on these complex liminal spaces between hard categories of difference that Bjork-James’s book is especially impressive.","PeriodicalId":45932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Religion","volume":"37 1","pages":"563 - 565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lived Religion, Pentecostalism, and Social Activism in Authoritarian Chile: Giving Life to the Faith\",\"authors\":\"M. Lindhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13537903.2022.2062863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"evangelicalism in the US. Bjork-James’s conversations with a range of evangelicals— leaders and followers, promoters, critics, loyalists, and dissenters—are set within their broader contexts in a way that means intersectional dimensions are illuminated in all their complexity. The emerging, careful disentangling of human relationships, their development and complex orientation to faith, morality, and social life makes for compelling reading and at numerous points its subtlety warns against the kneejerk, stereotypical claims often made about this controversial movement. At the same time, we do not lose sight of the power dynamics of White evangelicalism either. Here, Bjork-James’s study is especially revealing, covering familiar ground (e.g. the tendency to present God and government as mutually exclusive) while also pressing the analysis to expose more novel patterns revealed through thick descriptions of her fieldwork. A striking example is the chapter on same-sex attraction, which explores how evangelicals privilege certain forms of ‘sexual citizenship’ over others. While acknowledging a range of sins (and insisting they are not ranked in order of severity), in practice, same-sex relationships are subject to much more vitriol than any others, “as though sex is the fastest way out of God’s benign kingdom, and cultivating the correct—heterosexual and gendered—sexual identities and desires is a requirement for remaining in this ethical world” (92). Bjork-James exposes the power of this embedded configuration of sexual-social order, deployed as a basis for condemnation, social exclusion, and family breakdown. By contrast, a later chapter attends to cases of evangelicals who have developed a more critical perspective on the ‘familism’ that has become predominant in their movement, including younger generations whose experience has led to them embracing a “broadened ethical paradigm” (128). The examples here are especially inspiring. Some of the individuals Bjork-James encountered remained conservative in their beliefs and values about family and the Christian life, but their experiences meeting others who were different had fostered a different tone in their rhetoric, one based on mutual respect, courtesy, and an openness to new knowledge. It is in throwing light on these complex liminal spaces between hard categories of difference that Bjork-James’s book is especially impressive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Religion\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"563 - 565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2022.2062863\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2022.2062863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比约克·詹姆斯与一系列福音派人士——领袖和追随者、推动者、评论家、效忠者和持不同政见者——的对话是在他们更广泛的背景下进行的,这意味着交叉层面的复杂性都得到了体现。对人际关系、人际关系的发展以及对信仰、道德和社会生活的复杂定位的不断出现和仔细的解开,使人读起来很有说服力,在许多方面,它的微妙之处警告人们不要对这场有争议的运动持下意识的、刻板的说法。与此同时,我们也没有忽视白人福音派的权力动态。在这里,比约克·詹姆斯的研究尤其具有启发性,涵盖了熟悉的领域(例如,将上帝和政府呈现为相互排斥的倾向),同时也强调了分析,以揭示通过对她的田野调查的大量描述而揭示的更多新颖模式。一个引人注目的例子是关于同性吸引力的章节,该章探讨了福音派如何将某些形式的“性公民身份”凌驾于其他形式之上。虽然承认一系列罪行(并坚持不按严重程度排列),但在实践中,同性关系比其他任何关系都要受到更多的刻薄,“就好像性是离开上帝良性王国的最快途径,培养正确的——异性恋和性别化的——性身份和欲望是留在这个道德世界的要求”(92)。比约克·詹姆斯揭露了这种根深蒂固的性社会秩序的力量,这种秩序被用作谴责、社会排斥和家庭破裂的基础。相比之下,后一章关注的是福音派的案例,他们对在他们的运动中占主导地位的“家庭主义”形成了更批判性的观点,包括年轻一代,他们的经历使他们接受了“更广泛的道德范式”(128)。这里的例子特别鼓舞人心。比约克·詹姆斯遇到的一些人对家庭和基督教生活的信仰和价值观仍然保守,但他们遇到不同的人的经历培养了他们说话的不同基调,一种基于相互尊重、礼貌和对新知识的开放。比约克·詹姆斯的书尤其令人印象深刻,因为它揭示了这些难以区分的类别之间的复杂界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lived Religion, Pentecostalism, and Social Activism in Authoritarian Chile: Giving Life to the Faith
evangelicalism in the US. Bjork-James’s conversations with a range of evangelicals— leaders and followers, promoters, critics, loyalists, and dissenters—are set within their broader contexts in a way that means intersectional dimensions are illuminated in all their complexity. The emerging, careful disentangling of human relationships, their development and complex orientation to faith, morality, and social life makes for compelling reading and at numerous points its subtlety warns against the kneejerk, stereotypical claims often made about this controversial movement. At the same time, we do not lose sight of the power dynamics of White evangelicalism either. Here, Bjork-James’s study is especially revealing, covering familiar ground (e.g. the tendency to present God and government as mutually exclusive) while also pressing the analysis to expose more novel patterns revealed through thick descriptions of her fieldwork. A striking example is the chapter on same-sex attraction, which explores how evangelicals privilege certain forms of ‘sexual citizenship’ over others. While acknowledging a range of sins (and insisting they are not ranked in order of severity), in practice, same-sex relationships are subject to much more vitriol than any others, “as though sex is the fastest way out of God’s benign kingdom, and cultivating the correct—heterosexual and gendered—sexual identities and desires is a requirement for remaining in this ethical world” (92). Bjork-James exposes the power of this embedded configuration of sexual-social order, deployed as a basis for condemnation, social exclusion, and family breakdown. By contrast, a later chapter attends to cases of evangelicals who have developed a more critical perspective on the ‘familism’ that has become predominant in their movement, including younger generations whose experience has led to them embracing a “broadened ethical paradigm” (128). The examples here are especially inspiring. Some of the individuals Bjork-James encountered remained conservative in their beliefs and values about family and the Christian life, but their experiences meeting others who were different had fostered a different tone in their rhetoric, one based on mutual respect, courtesy, and an openness to new knowledge. It is in throwing light on these complex liminal spaces between hard categories of difference that Bjork-James’s book is especially impressive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Journal of Contemporary Religion is an international peer reviewed journal. Its purpose is to both document and evaluate the anthropological, sociological, psychological, and philosophical aspects of emerging manifestations of religiosity in any part of the world—whether within innovative movements or mainstream institutions. The term ''religion'' in the title of this journal is understood to include contributions on spirituality. Moreover, as the journal title suggests, the focus is on contemporary issues. Therefore, the editors of Journal of Contemporary Religion welcome submissions which deal with: classical topics in the study of religion, such as secularisation and the vitality of religion or traditional sectarian movements; more recent developments in the study of religion, including religion and social problems, religion and the environment, religion and education, the transmission of religion, the materialisation and visualisation of religion in various forms, new forms of religious pluralism, the rise of new forms of religion and spirituality, religion and the Internet, religion and science, religion and globalisation, religion and the economy, etc. theoretical approaches to the study of religion; discussions of methods in relation to empirical research; qualitative and quantitative research and related issues. The Journal includes reviews of books which reflect the above themes.
期刊最新文献
Fostering the sacred in a secular society: Catholic women practicing religion through intimate relationships ‘God’s Story’ as ideological determinant in faith-based cosmopolitanism Neoliberal shifts and strategies of religious adaptation in post-war Sri Lanka Developing religious literacy through popular culture fandom: engaging religious issues in Fleabag fan fiction Religion in lockdown: worship in the time of Covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1