阅读理解中的策略指导和自我调节评估:文献综述

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Preventing School Failure Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1080/1045988X.2022.2132198
L. Rollins, Sara Sanders, K. Jolivette, Ashley S. Virgin
{"title":"阅读理解中的策略指导和自我调节评估:文献综述","authors":"L. Rollins, Sara Sanders, K. Jolivette, Ashley S. Virgin","doi":"10.1080/1045988X.2022.2132198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Strategy instruction is a common instructional method for teaching academic skills, particularly reading comprehension, and it is commonly combined with self-regulation components (e.g., goal setting, self-monitoring). Previous meta-analyses and reviews have examined the effectiveness of strategy instruction on reading comprehension, but have not examined how reading comprehension is assessed, an area of need considering that reading comprehension assessments are not created equal. In this systematic review, sixteen articles were examined to determine the methods for assessing reading comprehension, self-regulation, reading motivation/attitudes, and social validity. In addition, the Council for Exceptional Children’s Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education were applied to all included studies. Limitations and recommendation for future researchers are presented and disussed.","PeriodicalId":46774,"journal":{"name":"Preventing School Failure","volume":"66 1","pages":"301 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of strategy instruction and self-regulation in reading comprehension: A review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"L. Rollins, Sara Sanders, K. Jolivette, Ashley S. Virgin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1045988X.2022.2132198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Strategy instruction is a common instructional method for teaching academic skills, particularly reading comprehension, and it is commonly combined with self-regulation components (e.g., goal setting, self-monitoring). Previous meta-analyses and reviews have examined the effectiveness of strategy instruction on reading comprehension, but have not examined how reading comprehension is assessed, an area of need considering that reading comprehension assessments are not created equal. In this systematic review, sixteen articles were examined to determine the methods for assessing reading comprehension, self-regulation, reading motivation/attitudes, and social validity. In addition, the Council for Exceptional Children’s Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education were applied to all included studies. Limitations and recommendation for future researchers are presented and disussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"301 - 311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventing School Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2022.2132198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing School Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2022.2132198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要策略教学是一种常见的教学方法,用于教授学术技能,尤其是阅读理解,它通常与自我调节组成部分(如目标设定、自我监控)相结合。先前的元分析和综述已经考察了策略教学对阅读理解的有效性,但没有考察如何评估阅读理解,考虑到阅读理解评估并非平等,这是一个需要关注的领域。在这篇系统综述中,对16篇文章进行了检查,以确定评估阅读理解、自我调节、阅读动机/态度和社会有效性的方法。此外,特殊儿童委员会的《特殊教育循证实践标准》适用于所有纳入的研究。提出并讨论了未来研究人员的局限性和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of strategy instruction and self-regulation in reading comprehension: A review of the literature
Abstract Strategy instruction is a common instructional method for teaching academic skills, particularly reading comprehension, and it is commonly combined with self-regulation components (e.g., goal setting, self-monitoring). Previous meta-analyses and reviews have examined the effectiveness of strategy instruction on reading comprehension, but have not examined how reading comprehension is assessed, an area of need considering that reading comprehension assessments are not created equal. In this systematic review, sixteen articles were examined to determine the methods for assessing reading comprehension, self-regulation, reading motivation/attitudes, and social validity. In addition, the Council for Exceptional Children’s Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education were applied to all included studies. Limitations and recommendation for future researchers are presented and disussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventing School Failure
Preventing School Failure EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Preventing School Failure provides a forum in which to examine critically emerging and evidence-based practices that are both data driven and practical for children and youth in general and alternative education systems. Authors are afforded the opportunity to discuss and debate critical and sometimes controversial issues that affect the education of children and adolescents in various settings. Preventing School Failure is a peer-reviewed academic journal for administrators, educators, mental health workers, juvenile justice and corrections personnel, day and residential treatment personnel, staff-development specialists, teacher educators, and others. Our goal is to share authoritative and timely information with a wide-ranging audience dedicated to serving children and adolescents in general education, special education, and alternative education programs. We accept for review manuscripts that contain critical and integrated literature reviews, objective program evaluations, evidence-based strategies and procedures, program descriptions, and policy-related content. As appropriate, manuscripts should contain enough detail that readers are able to put useful or innovative strategies or procedures into practice.
期刊最新文献
The gap between research and practice revisited: Accommodation practices amid the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond Examining behavior specific praise as an individual behavior management strategy in a high-need educational setting Addressing discipline equity: the Inclusive Skill-Building Learning Approach (ISLA) an alternative to exclusionary discipline Remedial and compensatory writing technologies for middle school students with learning disabilities and their classmates in inclusive classrooms Professional development on the basics of behavior assessment and intervention: training by school district staff for district staff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1