单一策略对多个市场影响的单一制裁——土耳其最高行政法院认可的“一事不再理”

G. Gürkaynak, K. Öztürk, Aydeniz Baytaş
{"title":"单一策略对多个市场影响的单一制裁——土耳其最高行政法院认可的“一事不再理”","authors":"G. Gürkaynak, K. Öztürk, Aydeniz Baytaş","doi":"10.1093/jeclap/lpab061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent judgments by Turkish administrative courts concerning the Turkish Competition Board’s (‘Board’) decisions as a result of investigations conducted into Mey İçki San. ve Tic. A.Ş’s (‘Mey İçki’), a subsidiary of Diageo plc., business practices in the rakı, vodka and gin markets (‘Mey İçki case’) lead the discussions of the applicability of ne bis in idem principle in competition law. First, the Board applied the ne bis in idem principle based on the element of sameness of Mey İçki’s conducts in the rakı market and vodka and gin markets. Then, the local courts adopted the same approach, but the Regional Administrative Court accepted that two offences based on same conduct/conducts in different markets should be subject to duplicative sanctions. Eventually, the Council of State reversed this decision by focusing on the sameness of the actions concerned and found the Board’s decision to be lawful.","PeriodicalId":51907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single Sanction for Effects of Single Strategy in Multiple Markets—‘Ne Bis in Idem’ Recognised by the Highest Administrative Court in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"G. Gürkaynak, K. Öztürk, Aydeniz Baytaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jeclap/lpab061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent judgments by Turkish administrative courts concerning the Turkish Competition Board’s (‘Board’) decisions as a result of investigations conducted into Mey İçki San. ve Tic. A.Ş’s (‘Mey İçki’), a subsidiary of Diageo plc., business practices in the rakı, vodka and gin markets (‘Mey İçki case’) lead the discussions of the applicability of ne bis in idem principle in competition law. First, the Board applied the ne bis in idem principle based on the element of sameness of Mey İçki’s conducts in the rakı market and vodka and gin markets. Then, the local courts adopted the same approach, but the Regional Administrative Court accepted that two offences based on same conduct/conducts in different markets should be subject to duplicative sanctions. Eventually, the Council of State reversed this decision by focusing on the sameness of the actions concerned and found the Board’s decision to be lawful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土耳其行政法院最近对土耳其竞争委员会(“委员会”)在对Mey Ilçki San进行调查后作出的决定作出的判决。ve Tic。A.Şs(“Meyïçki”),帝亚吉欧股份有限公司的子公司。,rakı、伏特加和杜松子酒市场的商业实践(“Mey Ilçki案”)引发了关于一罪不二审原则在竞争法中适用性的讨论。首先,董事会根据梅伊茨基在rakı市场、伏特加和杜松子酒市场的行为相同的因素,适用了一事不再理原则。然后,地方法院采取了同样的做法,但地区行政法院承认,基于不同市场的相同行为的两项罪行应受到重复制裁。最终,国务委员会推翻了这一决定,重点关注有关行动的相同性,并认为委员会的决定是合法的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single Sanction for Effects of Single Strategy in Multiple Markets—‘Ne Bis in Idem’ Recognised by the Highest Administrative Court in Turkey
The recent judgments by Turkish administrative courts concerning the Turkish Competition Board’s (‘Board’) decisions as a result of investigations conducted into Mey İçki San. ve Tic. A.Ş’s (‘Mey İçki’), a subsidiary of Diageo plc., business practices in the rakı, vodka and gin markets (‘Mey İçki case’) lead the discussions of the applicability of ne bis in idem principle in competition law. First, the Board applied the ne bis in idem principle based on the element of sameness of Mey İçki’s conducts in the rakı market and vodka and gin markets. Then, the local courts adopted the same approach, but the Regional Administrative Court accepted that two offences based on same conduct/conducts in different markets should be subject to duplicative sanctions. Eventually, the Council of State reversed this decision by focusing on the sameness of the actions concerned and found the Board’s decision to be lawful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
The Elephant in the Room Turns Twenty: The Effect on Trade and the Enforcement of the EU Competition Law by the National Competition Authorities Two Paths of Enforcement, Procedural Autonomy and the Risk of Fragmentation Parental Liability and Hold-Separate Commitments: Cases 1407-14/1/12/21 Allergan and Others v Competition and Markets Authority, [2023] CAT 56 Reviving Interim Measures in EU Antitrust Proceedings European Commission Requests for Information Ordering the Production of Internal Documents Responsive to Search Terms: Cases T-451/20 and T-452/20 Meta v Commission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1