中国和美欧联盟的崛起在2010年代漂移:欧盟失去的十年?

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI:10.18543/ced-03-2022pp71-93
Antonio José Pagán Sánchez
{"title":"中国和美欧联盟的崛起在2010年代漂移:欧盟失去的十年?","authors":"Antonio José Pagán Sánchez","doi":"10.18543/ced-03-2022pp71-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States and its allies within the European Union have been unable to forge a common response to deal with the rise of China. Even though China’s growing global presence might undermine the international position of the United States, Washington’s European allies have sometimes refused to close ranks with their American ally. And more importantly, European engagement with China during the last decade has lacked internal consistency and cohesion, to the point that the European Union has rarely been the relevant actor when it comes to shaping Europe-China relations. This is the conclusion reached by this paper after analyzing the EU’s behavior on the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the Belt and Road Initiative, the adoption of Huawei’s 5G technology and the consideration of China as a threat within NATO’s framework. The European Commission has been unwilling or unable to unite the member states around a common position on these four cases. However, the findings of this article also support the idea that an embryonic model of strategic autonomy was already underway during the last decade, and that the growing awareness within the EU about the importance and implications of China’s rise brings new geopolitical opportunities for the union. \nReceived: 28 July 2021Accepted: 05 November 2021","PeriodicalId":40611,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The rise of China and the US-Europe alliance drift in the 2010s: A lost decade for the European Union?\",\"authors\":\"Antonio José Pagán Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.18543/ced-03-2022pp71-93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United States and its allies within the European Union have been unable to forge a common response to deal with the rise of China. Even though China’s growing global presence might undermine the international position of the United States, Washington’s European allies have sometimes refused to close ranks with their American ally. And more importantly, European engagement with China during the last decade has lacked internal consistency and cohesion, to the point that the European Union has rarely been the relevant actor when it comes to shaping Europe-China relations. This is the conclusion reached by this paper after analyzing the EU’s behavior on the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the Belt and Road Initiative, the adoption of Huawei’s 5G technology and the consideration of China as a threat within NATO’s framework. The European Commission has been unwilling or unable to unite the member states around a common position on these four cases. However, the findings of this article also support the idea that an embryonic model of strategic autonomy was already underway during the last decade, and that the growing awareness within the EU about the importance and implications of China’s rise brings new geopolitical opportunities for the union. \\nReceived: 28 July 2021Accepted: 05 November 2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":40611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18543/ced-03-2022pp71-93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/ced-03-2022pp71-93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国及其在欧盟内的盟友一直无法达成共同的应对措施来应对中国的崛起。尽管中国日益增长的全球影响力可能会削弱美国的国际地位,但华盛顿的欧洲盟友有时拒绝与美国盟友结盟。更重要的是,在过去十年中,欧洲与中国的接触缺乏内部一致性和凝聚力,以至于在塑造欧中关系时,欧盟很少成为相关角色。这是本文在分析欧盟在亚洲基础设施投资银行、“一带一路”倡议倡议、采用华为5G技术以及在北约框架内将中国视为威胁的行为后得出的结论。欧盟委员会一直不愿或无法将成员国团结在这四起案件的共同立场周围。然而,本文的研究结果也支持了这样一种观点,即在过去十年中,战略自主的萌芽模式已经在进行中,欧盟内部对中国崛起的重要性和影响的日益认识为欧盟带来了新的地缘政治机遇。接收日期:2021年7月28日接受日期:2021月5日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The rise of China and the US-Europe alliance drift in the 2010s: A lost decade for the European Union?
The United States and its allies within the European Union have been unable to forge a common response to deal with the rise of China. Even though China’s growing global presence might undermine the international position of the United States, Washington’s European allies have sometimes refused to close ranks with their American ally. And more importantly, European engagement with China during the last decade has lacked internal consistency and cohesion, to the point that the European Union has rarely been the relevant actor when it comes to shaping Europe-China relations. This is the conclusion reached by this paper after analyzing the EU’s behavior on the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the Belt and Road Initiative, the adoption of Huawei’s 5G technology and the consideration of China as a threat within NATO’s framework. The European Commission has been unwilling or unable to unite the member states around a common position on these four cases. However, the findings of this article also support the idea that an embryonic model of strategic autonomy was already underway during the last decade, and that the growing awareness within the EU about the importance and implications of China’s rise brings new geopolitical opportunities for the union. Received: 28 July 2021Accepted: 05 November 2021
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Deusto Journal of European Studies (DJES) is a university journal specialised in the study of the European Union from an interdisciplinary perspective. It primarily aims at disseminating knowledge on the different aspects of the European construction process (historical, political, legal, economic, social, cultural issues, etc.). It also aims at encouraging reflection on and critical assessment of the different factors that determine European Union''s evolution and transformation. First published in 1987, Deusto Journal of European Studies (DJES) is issued twice a year. Its contents include a section on doctrinal articles, a section commenting the jurisprudence of the EU Court of Justice and a section on current European issues.
期刊最新文献
A vueltas con la regulación de las aguas de baño en la Unión Europea: ¿hacer de la necesidad, virtud? Actualidad institucional y económica de España en el marco de la Unión Europea (julio de 2024) Crónica de la Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea Primer semestre de 2024 La protección del medio ambiente en situaciones de conflicto armado: implicaciones para la Unión Europea a raíz de la guerra de Ucrania El sesgado desarrollo del convenio de Aarhus en la Unión Europea. ¿Justicia para el medioambiente?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1