调查数字图书馆参与的预测因素:一个结构化的文献分析

M. Rosman, Mohd Nasir Ismail, M. N. Masrek
{"title":"调查数字图书馆参与的预测因素:一个结构化的文献分析","authors":"M. Rosman, Mohd Nasir Ismail, M. N. Masrek","doi":"10.47657/1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital library is no longer considered a lavish use of technology but rather a mandatory need for users, especially postgraduate students. Each year, public and academic libraries invest a lot of money to subscribe to various digital resources, such as online databases, electronic books, electronic journals, and electronic magazines. However, many of these organizations have difficulties justifying their digital library investment due to lack of usage among the users. This underutilization of digital libraries is credited to the lack of digital library engagement among the users. Digital library engagement is defined as a deep and long-time use of digital library resources. Some researchers equate engagement to usage; however, engagement goes beyond the generic term of usage and may include multiple dimensions such as affective, cognitive, and behavioral. Previous works on the digital library have mostly focused on the generic definition of use instead of engagement. Researchers believe that the lack of study on digital library engagement causes the underutilization of digital libraries' resources. Despite the rising interest in the digital library, no research has studied digital library engagement predictors. Therefore, this paper aims to discuss the predictors of digital library engagement at the conceptual level. A structured literature review methodology was adopted; a total of 135 pieces of literature were included in this study. In total, 30 predictors of digital library engagement were identified, and these predictors were grouped into four factors: technological, individual, organizational, and contextual factors. Grounded on the previous literature on the digital library, the contributions of this paper are as follows: first, this paper identified a list of predictors of digital library engagement from past digital library literature, second, this paper categorized the predictors into four factors, and finally, this paper proposed a conceptual model for further validation of the predictors.","PeriodicalId":52112,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries","volume":"22 1","pages":"60-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Predictors of Digital Library Engagement: A Structured Literature Analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Rosman, Mohd Nasir Ismail, M. N. Masrek\",\"doi\":\"10.47657/1586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital library is no longer considered a lavish use of technology but rather a mandatory need for users, especially postgraduate students. Each year, public and academic libraries invest a lot of money to subscribe to various digital resources, such as online databases, electronic books, electronic journals, and electronic magazines. However, many of these organizations have difficulties justifying their digital library investment due to lack of usage among the users. This underutilization of digital libraries is credited to the lack of digital library engagement among the users. Digital library engagement is defined as a deep and long-time use of digital library resources. Some researchers equate engagement to usage; however, engagement goes beyond the generic term of usage and may include multiple dimensions such as affective, cognitive, and behavioral. Previous works on the digital library have mostly focused on the generic definition of use instead of engagement. Researchers believe that the lack of study on digital library engagement causes the underutilization of digital libraries' resources. Despite the rising interest in the digital library, no research has studied digital library engagement predictors. Therefore, this paper aims to discuss the predictors of digital library engagement at the conceptual level. A structured literature review methodology was adopted; a total of 135 pieces of literature were included in this study. In total, 30 predictors of digital library engagement were identified, and these predictors were grouped into four factors: technological, individual, organizational, and contextual factors. Grounded on the previous literature on the digital library, the contributions of this paper are as follows: first, this paper identified a list of predictors of digital library engagement from past digital library literature, second, this paper categorized the predictors into four factors, and finally, this paper proposed a conceptual model for further validation of the predictors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"60-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47657/1586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47657/1586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

数字图书馆不再被认为是对技术的奢侈使用,而是用户,尤其是研究生的强制性需求。每年,公共图书馆和学术图书馆都会投入大量资金来订阅各种数字资源,如在线数据库、电子书、电子期刊和电子杂志。然而,由于缺乏用户的使用,许多组织很难证明他们的数字图书馆投资是合理的。数字图书馆利用不足的原因是用户对数字图书馆缺乏参与。数字图书馆参与被定义为深度和长期使用数字图书馆资源。一些研究人员将投入等同于使用;然而,用户粘性超越了一般的使用术语,可能包括情感、认知和行为等多个维度。以前关于数字图书馆的工作主要集中在使用的一般定义上,而不是参与。研究者认为,数字图书馆参与性研究的缺失导致了数字图书馆资源的利用不足。尽管人们对数字图书馆的兴趣日益浓厚,但还没有研究数字图书馆参与预测因素。因此,本文旨在从概念层面探讨数字图书馆敬业度的预测因素。采用结构化文献综述方法;本研究共纳入文献135篇。总共确定了数字图书馆参与的30个预测因素,并将这些预测因素分为四个因素:技术因素、个人因素、组织因素和环境因素。基于以往数字图书馆文献,本文的贡献如下:首先,从以往的数字图书馆文献中识别出数字图书馆敬业度的预测因子;其次,本文将预测因子分为四个因素;最后,本文提出了一个概念模型,用于进一步验证预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the Predictors of Digital Library Engagement: A Structured Literature Analysis
Digital library is no longer considered a lavish use of technology but rather a mandatory need for users, especially postgraduate students. Each year, public and academic libraries invest a lot of money to subscribe to various digital resources, such as online databases, electronic books, electronic journals, and electronic magazines. However, many of these organizations have difficulties justifying their digital library investment due to lack of usage among the users. This underutilization of digital libraries is credited to the lack of digital library engagement among the users. Digital library engagement is defined as a deep and long-time use of digital library resources. Some researchers equate engagement to usage; however, engagement goes beyond the generic term of usage and may include multiple dimensions such as affective, cognitive, and behavioral. Previous works on the digital library have mostly focused on the generic definition of use instead of engagement. Researchers believe that the lack of study on digital library engagement causes the underutilization of digital libraries' resources. Despite the rising interest in the digital library, no research has studied digital library engagement predictors. Therefore, this paper aims to discuss the predictors of digital library engagement at the conceptual level. A structured literature review methodology was adopted; a total of 135 pieces of literature were included in this study. In total, 30 predictors of digital library engagement were identified, and these predictors were grouped into four factors: technological, individual, organizational, and contextual factors. Grounded on the previous literature on the digital library, the contributions of this paper are as follows: first, this paper identified a list of predictors of digital library engagement from past digital library literature, second, this paper categorized the predictors into four factors, and finally, this paper proposed a conceptual model for further validation of the predictors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries
Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The PJIM&L is a double-blind refereed scholarly journal. It is committed to publish original research articles, scholarly critiques and conceptual contributions to the areas of Information Management, Information Science and Librarianship. Ideas and views expressed in papers published in the PJIM&L is the sole responsibility of authors. It does not necessarily reflect opinion/policy of the Department or Editorial Advisory Board.
期刊最新文献
What Business Researchers are Producing during Covid-19 A bibliometric approach Information Seeking on the Web: An Empirical Analysis A Comparison of Q Index Ranked Journals: Library and Information Science Productivity and Research Trends (2011-2020) Correlation between the University Librarians’ Information Literacy Skills and Research Support Services Evidence-Based Librarianship in E-Resources Acquisition Decision: Construct Validity and Reliability of Instrument
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1