经Tarsi窦入路螺钉固定治疗跟骨骨折

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.4274/jarem.galenos.2023.69875
E. Özden, A. Aybar
{"title":"经Tarsi窦入路螺钉固定治疗跟骨骨折","authors":"E. Özden, A. Aybar","doi":"10.4274/jarem.galenos.2023.69875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Calcaneus is the most commonly fractured tarsal bone. This type of fracture may result from high-energy trauma or axial loading. The ideal treatment method for calcaneal fractures remains controversial in terms of surgical approach and the material that will be used for fracture fixation. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of screw-only fixation in intra-articular calcaneal fractures using the sinus tarsi approach. Methods: Patients who were treated between 2014 and 2021 for calcaneal fractures were retrospectively investigated. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle score, and Gissane and Böhler angles were measured and compared. Results: The study included 32 patients (23 male, 9 female) who underwent screw fixation through the sinus tarsi approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The mean age of the patients was 45.2 years. The fractures were classified according to the Sanders Classification, with 15 patients having type 2 fractures, 12 with type 3 fractures, and five with type 4 fractures. AOFAS hindfoot-ankle score revealed nine patients achieving excellent results, 14 patients achieving good results, and nine patients achieving fair results. AOFAS scores were lower in patients with Sanders type 4 fractures when compared to type 3 and type 2 fractures (p=0.005 and p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion: This study provides evidence supporting the favorable results of the sinus tarsi approach using screw-only fixation for treating intra-articular calcaneal fractures.","PeriodicalId":56162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screw-only Fixation of Calcaneal Fractures Using the Sinus Tarsi Approach\",\"authors\":\"E. Özden, A. Aybar\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/jarem.galenos.2023.69875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Calcaneus is the most commonly fractured tarsal bone. This type of fracture may result from high-energy trauma or axial loading. The ideal treatment method for calcaneal fractures remains controversial in terms of surgical approach and the material that will be used for fracture fixation. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of screw-only fixation in intra-articular calcaneal fractures using the sinus tarsi approach. Methods: Patients who were treated between 2014 and 2021 for calcaneal fractures were retrospectively investigated. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle score, and Gissane and Böhler angles were measured and compared. Results: The study included 32 patients (23 male, 9 female) who underwent screw fixation through the sinus tarsi approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The mean age of the patients was 45.2 years. The fractures were classified according to the Sanders Classification, with 15 patients having type 2 fractures, 12 with type 3 fractures, and five with type 4 fractures. AOFAS hindfoot-ankle score revealed nine patients achieving excellent results, 14 patients achieving good results, and nine patients achieving fair results. AOFAS scores were lower in patients with Sanders type 4 fractures when compared to type 3 and type 2 fractures (p=0.005 and p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion: This study provides evidence supporting the favorable results of the sinus tarsi approach using screw-only fixation for treating intra-articular calcaneal fractures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/jarem.galenos.2023.69875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jarem.galenos.2023.69875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:跟骨是最常见的跗骨骨折。这种类型的骨折可能是由高能创伤或轴向载荷引起的。跟骨骨折的理想治疗方法在手术方法和骨折固定材料方面仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估使用跗骨窦入路仅螺钉固定治疗跟骨关节内骨折的疗效。方法:对2014年至2021年间接受跟骨骨折治疗的患者进行回顾性调查。使用美国足踝矫形学会(AOFAS)后足踝关节评分评估功能结果,并测量和比较Gissane角和Böhler角。结果:本研究包括32名患者(23名男性,9名女性),他们通过跗骨窦入路接受螺钉固定治疗关节内跟骨骨折。患者的平均年龄为45.2岁。根据Sanders分类法对骨折进行分类,其中15名患者为2型骨折,12名患者为3型骨折,5名患者为4型骨折。AOFAS后足踝关节评分显示,9名患者取得了优异成绩,14名患者取得良好成绩,9名病人取得了尚可成绩。Sanders 4型骨折患者的AOFAS评分低于3型和2型骨折患者(分别为0.005和0.001)。结论:本研究为单纯螺钉内固定治疗跟骨关节内骨折的跗骨窦入路提供了良好的疗效支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screw-only Fixation of Calcaneal Fractures Using the Sinus Tarsi Approach
Objective: Calcaneus is the most commonly fractured tarsal bone. This type of fracture may result from high-energy trauma or axial loading. The ideal treatment method for calcaneal fractures remains controversial in terms of surgical approach and the material that will be used for fracture fixation. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of screw-only fixation in intra-articular calcaneal fractures using the sinus tarsi approach. Methods: Patients who were treated between 2014 and 2021 for calcaneal fractures were retrospectively investigated. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle score, and Gissane and Böhler angles were measured and compared. Results: The study included 32 patients (23 male, 9 female) who underwent screw fixation through the sinus tarsi approach for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The mean age of the patients was 45.2 years. The fractures were classified according to the Sanders Classification, with 15 patients having type 2 fractures, 12 with type 3 fractures, and five with type 4 fractures. AOFAS hindfoot-ankle score revealed nine patients achieving excellent results, 14 patients achieving good results, and nine patients achieving fair results. AOFAS scores were lower in patients with Sanders type 4 fractures when compared to type 3 and type 2 fractures (p=0.005 and p<0.001 respectively). Conclusion: This study provides evidence supporting the favorable results of the sinus tarsi approach using screw-only fixation for treating intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Relationship Between the Protrusion of the Optic Nerve and Internal Carotid Artery and Sphenoid Sinus Volume Would Women Who Have Been Informed About Automated Breast Ultrasound Prefer This Method to Manuel Ultrasound? Cyberchondria’s Possible Relationship with Problematic Internet Use and eHealth Literacy Prediction of Difficulty Level of Laparoscopic Cholecistectomy According to Preoperative Findings Synthesis of Graphene Oxide and Evaluation of Its Cytotoxic Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1