1866-1870年奥普战争中战场表现的国际分析

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY War & Society Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI:10.1080/07292473.2022.2087399
Mark Bennett
{"title":"1866-1870年奥普战争中战场表现的国际分析","authors":"Mark Bennett","doi":"10.1080/07292473.2022.2087399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the startling Prussian victory in the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, European observers sought to understand the war’s lessons and to apply them to future conflict. This article traces the way in which commentators in Britain, France, Prussia, Austria, and the various secondary states of Germany evaluated tactical developments resulting from the war. It highlights the transnational community of interest in military affairs, and how some imperfections in military learning from the war were nationally specific while others transcended borders. Understandings of the war’s battlefield implications were often slow to develop, and imperfectly anticipated conditions in the subsequent Franco-Prussian War.","PeriodicalId":43656,"journal":{"name":"War & Society","volume":"41 1","pages":"182 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International analysis of battlefield performance in the Austro-Prussian War, 1866–1870\",\"authors\":\"Mark Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07292473.2022.2087399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the startling Prussian victory in the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, European observers sought to understand the war’s lessons and to apply them to future conflict. This article traces the way in which commentators in Britain, France, Prussia, Austria, and the various secondary states of Germany evaluated tactical developments resulting from the war. It highlights the transnational community of interest in military affairs, and how some imperfections in military learning from the war were nationally specific while others transcended borders. Understandings of the war’s battlefield implications were often slow to develop, and imperfectly anticipated conditions in the subsequent Franco-Prussian War.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"War & Society\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"182 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"War & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07292473.2022.2087399\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07292473.2022.2087399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1866年,普鲁士在奥普战争中取得了惊人的胜利,欧洲观察家们试图了解这场战争的教训,并将其应用到未来的冲突中。这篇文章追溯了英国、法国、普鲁士、奥地利和德国各个次级州的评论员对战争造成的战术发展的评价。它突出了跨国社会对军事事务的兴趣,以及战争中军事学习的一些不完善之处是如何针对国家的,而另一些则超越了国界。对这场战争的战场影响的理解往往发展缓慢,并且无法完全预测随后的普法战争的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International analysis of battlefield performance in the Austro-Prussian War, 1866–1870
Following the startling Prussian victory in the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, European observers sought to understand the war’s lessons and to apply them to future conflict. This article traces the way in which commentators in Britain, France, Prussia, Austria, and the various secondary states of Germany evaluated tactical developments resulting from the war. It highlights the transnational community of interest in military affairs, and how some imperfections in military learning from the war were nationally specific while others transcended borders. Understandings of the war’s battlefield implications were often slow to develop, and imperfectly anticipated conditions in the subsequent Franco-Prussian War.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
War & Society
War & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of tocilizumab in hospitalized moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients: a real-life study. Agencies, temporalities, and spatialities in Hiroshima’s post-war reconstruction: a case of reflexive peacebuilding in the Anthropocene? Anomalies in Collective Victimhood in Post-War Japan: ‘Hiroshima’ As a Victimisation Symbol for the Collective National Memory of War The Southern Irish Loyalists Relief Association and Irish Ex-Servicemen of the First World War, 1922–1932 Military welfare history: what is it and why should it be considered?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1