中国金融科技监管

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Asian Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI:10.1017/als.2022.11
Li Guo
{"title":"中国金融科技监管","authors":"Li Guo","doi":"10.1017/als.2022.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fintech, a portmanteau combining “finance” and “technology,” has been a buzzword in recent years, due to its great potential for reshaping the financial landscape and society in general. The important question is thus how to develop a fintech market. The influential “law and finance” literature has taught us that law matters.1 Indeed, one of the key success factors for developing a robust fintech market is an effective regulatory regime that ensures investor protection while encouraging market innovation. As a leader in fintech and the second largest economy in the world, China’s regulatory experience is of both academic and practical significance. There are a number of interesting questions to be answered: What are the factors that have contributed to the growth of the Chinese fintech market? Are the lessons from the Chinese model replicable in other markets? Is the growth in the Chinese fintech market sustainable? If so, how? In Fintech Regulation in China, Professor Robin Hui Huang has done a sterling job of answering the questions above. As a leading authority on Chinese corporate and financial law, Professor Huang masterfully provides a comprehensive examination of China’s fintech regulation in a clear and convincing manner. The book not only examines the black-letter law, but also analyses the interactions between factors that contribute to the formation and implementation of China’s fintech regime. Moreover, in evaluating fintech regulation in China, the book undertakes a comparative analysis to cover some other major fintech markets, such as the US, the UK, Singapore, and Hong Kong. It is an extraordinary endeavour to do so, as fintech regulation is highly complex and rapidly evolving. In China, for example, the fintech regime comprises many national laws, regulatory rules issued by a multitude of regulators at the national and local levels, guidance documents of various self-regulatory organizations, as well as court cases. Professor Huang beautifully accomplished the otherwise formidable task, thanks to his rich diversity of backgrounds and experiences in China and overseas. He has an admirably deep and sharp understanding of how Chinese law functions as well as how it compares to the rest of the world. The book is well organized with nine chapters. Chapter 1 usefully introduces the Chinese regulatory framework for the fintech market, including the central bank, namely the People’s Bank of China, the national sectors-based regulators such as the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as the self-regulatory organizations and local regulators. As fintech is an evolving concept and covers a wide range of sectors, the book carefully selected some more significant fintech sectors as case-studies, namely online P2P lending, cryptoassets, initial coin offerings, mobile payments, data protection, robo-advisory, equity crowdfunding, and central bank digital currency. They are all well chosen because there are examples of success stories as well as lessons of failures, so as to present a multifaceted view of China’s fintech regulation. Chapter 2 focuses on the regulation of online P2P lending in China. China’s online P2P lending business, as an important component of fintech market, was once very popular with more than 3,000 platforms at its height, but by the end of 2020, it had been completely wiped out from the Chinese financial landscape. This chapter traces the development and regulation of online P2P lending in China, with a view to finding out what factors","PeriodicalId":54015,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","volume":"10 1","pages":"343 - 345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fintech regulation in China\",\"authors\":\"Li Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/als.2022.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fintech, a portmanteau combining “finance” and “technology,” has been a buzzword in recent years, due to its great potential for reshaping the financial landscape and society in general. The important question is thus how to develop a fintech market. The influential “law and finance” literature has taught us that law matters.1 Indeed, one of the key success factors for developing a robust fintech market is an effective regulatory regime that ensures investor protection while encouraging market innovation. As a leader in fintech and the second largest economy in the world, China’s regulatory experience is of both academic and practical significance. There are a number of interesting questions to be answered: What are the factors that have contributed to the growth of the Chinese fintech market? Are the lessons from the Chinese model replicable in other markets? Is the growth in the Chinese fintech market sustainable? If so, how? In Fintech Regulation in China, Professor Robin Hui Huang has done a sterling job of answering the questions above. As a leading authority on Chinese corporate and financial law, Professor Huang masterfully provides a comprehensive examination of China’s fintech regulation in a clear and convincing manner. The book not only examines the black-letter law, but also analyses the interactions between factors that contribute to the formation and implementation of China’s fintech regime. Moreover, in evaluating fintech regulation in China, the book undertakes a comparative analysis to cover some other major fintech markets, such as the US, the UK, Singapore, and Hong Kong. It is an extraordinary endeavour to do so, as fintech regulation is highly complex and rapidly evolving. In China, for example, the fintech regime comprises many national laws, regulatory rules issued by a multitude of regulators at the national and local levels, guidance documents of various self-regulatory organizations, as well as court cases. Professor Huang beautifully accomplished the otherwise formidable task, thanks to his rich diversity of backgrounds and experiences in China and overseas. He has an admirably deep and sharp understanding of how Chinese law functions as well as how it compares to the rest of the world. The book is well organized with nine chapters. Chapter 1 usefully introduces the Chinese regulatory framework for the fintech market, including the central bank, namely the People’s Bank of China, the national sectors-based regulators such as the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as the self-regulatory organizations and local regulators. As fintech is an evolving concept and covers a wide range of sectors, the book carefully selected some more significant fintech sectors as case-studies, namely online P2P lending, cryptoassets, initial coin offerings, mobile payments, data protection, robo-advisory, equity crowdfunding, and central bank digital currency. They are all well chosen because there are examples of success stories as well as lessons of failures, so as to present a multifaceted view of China’s fintech regulation. Chapter 2 focuses on the regulation of online P2P lending in China. China’s online P2P lending business, as an important component of fintech market, was once very popular with more than 3,000 platforms at its height, but by the end of 2020, it had been completely wiped out from the Chinese financial landscape. This chapter traces the development and regulation of online P2P lending in China, with a view to finding out what factors\",\"PeriodicalId\":54015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"343 - 345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.11\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.11","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

金融科技(Fintech)是“金融”(finance)和“技术”(technology)的合成词,近年来一直是一个热词,因为它具有重塑金融格局和整个社会的巨大潜力。因此,重要的问题是如何发展金融科技市场。有影响力的“法律与金融”文学告诉我们,法律很重要事实上,发展一个强大的金融科技市场的关键成功因素之一是有效的监管制度,以确保投资者得到保护,同时鼓励市场创新。作为金融科技的领头羊和世界第二大经济体,中国的监管经验既有学术意义,也有现实意义。有一些有趣的问题需要回答:推动中国金融科技市场增长的因素是什么?中国模式的经验可以在其他市场复制吗?中国金融科技市场的增长是否可持续?如果有,怎么做?在《中国金融科技监管》一书中,黄辉教授出色地回答了上述问题。作为中国公司法和金融法的权威,黄教授以清晰而令人信服的方式对中国金融科技监管进行了全面的考察。这本书不仅考察了黑字法,还分析了促成中国金融科技制度形成和实施的因素之间的相互作用。此外,在评估中国金融科技监管时,本书对美国、英国、新加坡和香港等其他主要金融科技市场进行了比较分析。这是一项非凡的努力,因为金融科技监管高度复杂且发展迅速。例如,在中国,金融科技制度包括许多国家法律、众多国家和地方监管机构发布的监管规则、各种自律组织的指导文件以及法院案件。黄教授凭借其丰富的国内外背景和经验,出色地完成了这项艰巨的任务。他对中国法律的运作方式以及与世界其他地区的比较有着令人钦佩的深刻和敏锐的理解。这本书有九个章节,组织得很好。第一章介绍了中国对金融科技市场的监管框架,包括央行(即中国人民银行)、全国性行业监管机构(如中国银行保险监督管理委员会、中国证券监督管理委员会)以及自律组织和地方监管机构。由于金融科技是一个不断发展的概念,涵盖了广泛的领域,本书精心挑选了一些更重要的金融科技领域作为案例研究,即在线P2P借贷、加密资产、首次代币发行(ico)、移动支付、数据保护、机器人咨询、股权众筹和央行数字货币。它们都是精心挑选的,因为既有成功的例子,也有失败的教训,以呈现中国金融科技监管的多角度。第二章主要研究中国P2P网络借贷的监管。中国的网络P2P借贷业务作为金融科技市场的重要组成部分,曾经非常受欢迎,高峰时期有3000多家平台,但到2020年底,它已经完全从中国金融格局中消失了。本章对中国P2P网络借贷的发展和监管进行了追溯,以期找出哪些因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fintech regulation in China
Fintech, a portmanteau combining “finance” and “technology,” has been a buzzword in recent years, due to its great potential for reshaping the financial landscape and society in general. The important question is thus how to develop a fintech market. The influential “law and finance” literature has taught us that law matters.1 Indeed, one of the key success factors for developing a robust fintech market is an effective regulatory regime that ensures investor protection while encouraging market innovation. As a leader in fintech and the second largest economy in the world, China’s regulatory experience is of both academic and practical significance. There are a number of interesting questions to be answered: What are the factors that have contributed to the growth of the Chinese fintech market? Are the lessons from the Chinese model replicable in other markets? Is the growth in the Chinese fintech market sustainable? If so, how? In Fintech Regulation in China, Professor Robin Hui Huang has done a sterling job of answering the questions above. As a leading authority on Chinese corporate and financial law, Professor Huang masterfully provides a comprehensive examination of China’s fintech regulation in a clear and convincing manner. The book not only examines the black-letter law, but also analyses the interactions between factors that contribute to the formation and implementation of China’s fintech regime. Moreover, in evaluating fintech regulation in China, the book undertakes a comparative analysis to cover some other major fintech markets, such as the US, the UK, Singapore, and Hong Kong. It is an extraordinary endeavour to do so, as fintech regulation is highly complex and rapidly evolving. In China, for example, the fintech regime comprises many national laws, regulatory rules issued by a multitude of regulators at the national and local levels, guidance documents of various self-regulatory organizations, as well as court cases. Professor Huang beautifully accomplished the otherwise formidable task, thanks to his rich diversity of backgrounds and experiences in China and overseas. He has an admirably deep and sharp understanding of how Chinese law functions as well as how it compares to the rest of the world. The book is well organized with nine chapters. Chapter 1 usefully introduces the Chinese regulatory framework for the fintech market, including the central bank, namely the People’s Bank of China, the national sectors-based regulators such as the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as the self-regulatory organizations and local regulators. As fintech is an evolving concept and covers a wide range of sectors, the book carefully selected some more significant fintech sectors as case-studies, namely online P2P lending, cryptoassets, initial coin offerings, mobile payments, data protection, robo-advisory, equity crowdfunding, and central bank digital currency. They are all well chosen because there are examples of success stories as well as lessons of failures, so as to present a multifaceted view of China’s fintech regulation. Chapter 2 focuses on the regulation of online P2P lending in China. China’s online P2P lending business, as an important component of fintech market, was once very popular with more than 3,000 platforms at its height, but by the end of 2020, it had been completely wiped out from the Chinese financial landscape. This chapter traces the development and regulation of online P2P lending in China, with a view to finding out what factors
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Law and Society (AJLS) adds an increasingly important Asian perspective to global law and society scholarship. This independent, peer-reviewed publication encourages empirical and multi-disciplinary research and welcomes articles on law and its relationship with society in Asia, articles bringing an Asian perspective to socio-legal issues of global concern, and articles using Asia as a starting point for a comparative exploration of law and society topics. Its coverage of Asia is broad and stretches from East Asia, South Asia and South East Asia to Central Asia. A unique combination of a base in Asia and an international editorial team creates a forum for Asian and Western scholars to exchange ideas of interest to Asian scholars and professionals, those working in or on Asia, as well as all working on law and society issues globally.
期刊最新文献
A Dynamic Theory of Prosecutorial Roles in Adversarial Trials Interrogating the Drunkards and Representing Drunkenness in the Qing Law Coexisting with Drug Addiction: Strategies Used by Hong Kong’s Older Mixed Users to Improve Their Perceived Quality of Life Liability Beyond Law: Conceptions of Fairness in Chinese Tort Cases Neocolonial Digitality: Analyzing Digital Legal Databases Using Legal Pluralism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1