胰头切除术后两种不同重建技术的比较。

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2020-05-26 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08338-8
E. Morandi, C. Corbellini, M. Castoldi, A. de Vuono, L. Pisoni, G. Vignati
{"title":"胰头切除术后两种不同重建技术的比较。","authors":"E. Morandi, C. Corbellini, M. Castoldi, A. de Vuono, L. Pisoni, G. Vignati","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08338-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe study aim is to evaluate if diverting drainage of bile and pancreatic secretions with an isolated Roux loop technique helps to decrease the rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality, in particular postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).\n\n\nMETHODS\nA prospectively-maintained database between 2006 and 2018 was reviewed. Patients who underwent primary elective pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. Two types of reconstruction methods were compared: single loop (SJL) reconstruction (28 patients) and isolated Roux-en-Y (DJL) reconstruction (36 patients). Demographic characteristics and perioperative results were compared between the two groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThis study includes 64 patients. The average duration of surgery was 308 mins; it was longer for DJL (p < 0,0001). Major postoperative complications were seen in 24 patients (9 in SJL; 15 in DJL) without statistically significant difference. The most frequent complication that occurred was PJ anastomosis failure (4 in SJL; 6 in DJL). The choice of postoperative complication management was not related to surgical reconstruction technique (p 0.389). Length of hospital stay in DJL was significantly longer than in SJL (p 0.04).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nNo significant advantage of one technique over the other was found. In our opinion, surgeons should choose the approach with which they have the most experience and ease.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between two different reconstruction techniques after pancreatic head resection.\",\"authors\":\"E. Morandi, C. Corbellini, M. Castoldi, A. de Vuono, L. Pisoni, G. Vignati\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08338-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThe study aim is to evaluate if diverting drainage of bile and pancreatic secretions with an isolated Roux loop technique helps to decrease the rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality, in particular postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA prospectively-maintained database between 2006 and 2018 was reviewed. Patients who underwent primary elective pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. Two types of reconstruction methods were compared: single loop (SJL) reconstruction (28 patients) and isolated Roux-en-Y (DJL) reconstruction (36 patients). Demographic characteristics and perioperative results were compared between the two groups.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThis study includes 64 patients. The average duration of surgery was 308 mins; it was longer for DJL (p < 0,0001). Major postoperative complications were seen in 24 patients (9 in SJL; 15 in DJL) without statistically significant difference. The most frequent complication that occurred was PJ anastomosis failure (4 in SJL; 6 in DJL). The choice of postoperative complication management was not related to surgical reconstruction technique (p 0.389). Length of hospital stay in DJL was significantly longer than in SJL (p 0.04).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nNo significant advantage of one technique over the other was found. In our opinion, surgeons should choose the approach with which they have the most experience and ease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08338-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08338-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估单独Roux环技术转移引流胆汁和胰腺分泌物是否有助于降低术后发病率和死亡率,特别是术后胰瘘(POPF)。方法回顾2006年至2018年前瞻性维护的数据库。接受原发性择期胰十二指肠切除术的患者也包括在内。比较两种重建方法:单环(SJL)重建(28例)和分离Roux-en-Y (DJL)重建(36例)。比较两组患者的人口学特征及围手术期结果。结果本研究纳入64例患者。平均手术时间308 min;而DJL则更长(p < 0.0001)。术后主要并发症24例(SJL 9例;DJL为15),差异无统计学意义。最常见的并发症是PJ吻合失败(SJL 4例;6在DJL)。术后并发症处理的选择与手术重建技术无关(p 0.389)。DJL患者住院时间明显长于SJL患者(p 0.04)。结论两种方法均无明显优势。在我们看来,外科医生应该选择他们最有经验和最容易的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between two different reconstruction techniques after pancreatic head resection.
BACKGROUND The study aim is to evaluate if diverting drainage of bile and pancreatic secretions with an isolated Roux loop technique helps to decrease the rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality, in particular postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). METHODS A prospectively-maintained database between 2006 and 2018 was reviewed. Patients who underwent primary elective pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. Two types of reconstruction methods were compared: single loop (SJL) reconstruction (28 patients) and isolated Roux-en-Y (DJL) reconstruction (36 patients). Demographic characteristics and perioperative results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS This study includes 64 patients. The average duration of surgery was 308 mins; it was longer for DJL (p < 0,0001). Major postoperative complications were seen in 24 patients (9 in SJL; 15 in DJL) without statistically significant difference. The most frequent complication that occurred was PJ anastomosis failure (4 in SJL; 6 in DJL). The choice of postoperative complication management was not related to surgical reconstruction technique (p 0.389). Length of hospital stay in DJL was significantly longer than in SJL (p 0.04). CONCLUSIONS No significant advantage of one technique over the other was found. In our opinion, surgeons should choose the approach with which they have the most experience and ease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1