INICIARE-26工具结果指标定义的构建和有效性

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Acta Paulista De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0242333
M. Graeff, M. Almeida
{"title":"INICIARE-26工具结果指标定义的构建和有效性","authors":"M. Graeff, M. Almeida","doi":"10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0242333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To construct and validate with experts the conceptual definitions (CD), operational definitions (OD) and magnitude of the operational definition (MOD) of the 26 outcome indicators of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), INICIARE-26 instrument components, which measures patients’ dependency on nursing care.\n\nMethods: A methodological study, in two stages, between January and July 2022. In the first, CD, OD and MOD were developed based on scientific literature. Semantic and conceptual equivalences were observed, in addition to standardization of the indicators’ textual formulation. In the second, the Delphi method was used for content validity by eight experts who assessed the relevance of the definitions under the following aspects: “not relevant”; “little relevant”; “quite relevant”; “highly relevant”. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was used, with a value greater than 0.78 for agreement analysis.\nResults\n\nThe CD CVI was unanimous for 15 indicators; CD were fully consensual for 17 indicators; MOD was obtained a CVI of 1.00 for 13 indicators. The other items had a CVI of 0.88. The items that did not reach 1.00 of agreement were revised, according to experts’ suggestions, with the aim of improving and providing greater clarity for instrument application.\n\nConclusion: The definitions were constructed and, at the time of validity, reached a satisfactory degree of agreement among experts, and some were unanimous.","PeriodicalId":6891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction and validity of definitions for outcome indicators of the INICIARE-26 instrument\",\"authors\":\"M. Graeff, M. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0242333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To construct and validate with experts the conceptual definitions (CD), operational definitions (OD) and magnitude of the operational definition (MOD) of the 26 outcome indicators of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), INICIARE-26 instrument components, which measures patients’ dependency on nursing care.\\n\\nMethods: A methodological study, in two stages, between January and July 2022. In the first, CD, OD and MOD were developed based on scientific literature. Semantic and conceptual equivalences were observed, in addition to standardization of the indicators’ textual formulation. In the second, the Delphi method was used for content validity by eight experts who assessed the relevance of the definitions under the following aspects: “not relevant”; “little relevant”; “quite relevant”; “highly relevant”. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was used, with a value greater than 0.78 for agreement analysis.\\nResults\\n\\nThe CD CVI was unanimous for 15 indicators; CD were fully consensual for 17 indicators; MOD was obtained a CVI of 1.00 for 13 indicators. The other items had a CVI of 0.88. The items that did not reach 1.00 of agreement were revised, according to experts’ suggestions, with the aim of improving and providing greater clarity for instrument application.\\n\\nConclusion: The definitions were constructed and, at the time of validity, reached a satisfactory degree of agreement among experts, and some were unanimous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0242333\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0242333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:构建并与专家一起验证护理结果分类(NOC)的26个结果指标的概念定义(CD)、操作定义(OD)和操作定义的大小(MOD),INICIARE-26仪器组件,用于测量患者对护理的依赖性。方法:方法学研究,分两个阶段,于2022年1月至7月进行。首先,CD、OD和MOD是在科学文献的基础上发展起来的。除了指标文本表述的标准化之外,还观察到语义和概念上的对等。在第二部分中,八位专家使用德尔菲方法对内容的有效性进行了评估,他们从以下几个方面评估了定义的相关性:“不相关”;“相关性不大”;“相当相关”;“高度相关”。使用内容有效性指数(CVI),其值大于0.78用于一致性分析。结果15项指标CD CVI一致;裁谈会就17项指标达成了完全一致意见;MOD获得的13个指标的CVI为1.00。其他项目的CVI为0.88。根据专家的建议,对未达到1.00一致意见的项目进行了修订,目的是改进文书的适用并使之更加明确。结论:这些定义是经过构建的,在有效期内,专家们达成了令人满意的一致意见,其中一些是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Construction and validity of definitions for outcome indicators of the INICIARE-26 instrument
Objective: To construct and validate with experts the conceptual definitions (CD), operational definitions (OD) and magnitude of the operational definition (MOD) of the 26 outcome indicators of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), INICIARE-26 instrument components, which measures patients’ dependency on nursing care. Methods: A methodological study, in two stages, between January and July 2022. In the first, CD, OD and MOD were developed based on scientific literature. Semantic and conceptual equivalences were observed, in addition to standardization of the indicators’ textual formulation. In the second, the Delphi method was used for content validity by eight experts who assessed the relevance of the definitions under the following aspects: “not relevant”; “little relevant”; “quite relevant”; “highly relevant”. The Content Validity Index (CVI) was used, with a value greater than 0.78 for agreement analysis. Results The CD CVI was unanimous for 15 indicators; CD were fully consensual for 17 indicators; MOD was obtained a CVI of 1.00 for 13 indicators. The other items had a CVI of 0.88. The items that did not reach 1.00 of agreement were revised, according to experts’ suggestions, with the aim of improving and providing greater clarity for instrument application. Conclusion: The definitions were constructed and, at the time of validity, reached a satisfactory degree of agreement among experts, and some were unanimous.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paulista de Enfermagem – (Acta Paul Enferm.), ISSN 1982-0194, is a [bilingual] technical-scientific electronic publication of the Escola Paulista de Enfermagem – EPE, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP. Our mission: To disseminate the scientific knowledge generated within the rigor of research and ethics methodology. Our objective: To publish results of original research for advancement of practices of clinical, surgical, and management nursing, as well as education, research, and information and communication technology.
期刊最新文献
Hospitalização de idosos por COVID-19 no Paraná: uma análise de fatores associados Higiene das mãos dos profissionais de saúde: perspectivas do estudante de enfermagem no papel de paciente/familiar COVID-19 nas prisões: validação de um inquérito de conhecimento, atitude e prática Diagrama de prevenção de quedas para pessoas idosas: revisão integrativa Recusa familiar para doação de córneas para transplante: fatores associados e tendência
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1