政治阶层专业化的问题和通过审议微型公众进行抽奖的潜力

Q2 Arts and Humanities Veritas Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.4067/s0718-92732022000300035
Gabriel Camarelles Queralt
{"title":"政治阶层专业化的问题和通过审议微型公众进行抽奖的潜力","authors":"Gabriel Camarelles Queralt","doi":"10.4067/s0718-92732022000300035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the greatest challenges to be overcome by contemporary electoral representative democracies is to alleviate citizen disaffection and, consequently, bridge the gap between the rulers and the ruled. A certain consensus could be reached if we affirmed that the professionalization of politicians is becoming one of the obstacles that citizens face when it comes to trusting the political system. I In this sense, the main objective of this article is to reflect on the harmful effects of the professionalization of the political class and analyze the potential of the sortition as a neutralizing mechanism. In turn, find out if this, through deliberative mini publics, has or not the ability to minimize its harmful excesses and, with it, increase the degree of trust of citizens with their political representatives.","PeriodicalId":37834,"journal":{"name":"Veritas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La problemática de la profesionalización de la clase política y el potencial del sorteo a través de minipúblicos deliberativos\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Camarelles Queralt\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-92732022000300035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the greatest challenges to be overcome by contemporary electoral representative democracies is to alleviate citizen disaffection and, consequently, bridge the gap between the rulers and the ruled. A certain consensus could be reached if we affirmed that the professionalization of politicians is becoming one of the obstacles that citizens face when it comes to trusting the political system. I In this sense, the main objective of this article is to reflect on the harmful effects of the professionalization of the political class and analyze the potential of the sortition as a neutralizing mechanism. In turn, find out if this, through deliberative mini publics, has or not the ability to minimize its harmful excesses and, with it, increase the degree of trust of citizens with their political representatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veritas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veritas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-92732022000300035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veritas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-92732022000300035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代选举代议制民主需要克服的最大挑战之一是减轻公民的不满情绪,从而弥合统治者与被统治者之间的差距。如果我们确认政治家的职业化正在成为公民在信任政治制度时面临的障碍之一,那么我们可以达成一定的共识。从这个意义上说,本文的主要目的是反思政治阶层专业化的有害影响,并分析这种分类作为一种中和机制的潜力。反过来,通过协商的迷你公众,找出这种做法是否有能力将其有害的过度行为降到最低,并由此增加公民对其政治代表的信任程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La problemática de la profesionalización de la clase política y el potencial del sorteo a través de minipúblicos deliberativos
One of the greatest challenges to be overcome by contemporary electoral representative democracies is to alleviate citizen disaffection and, consequently, bridge the gap between the rulers and the ruled. A certain consensus could be reached if we affirmed that the professionalization of politicians is becoming one of the obstacles that citizens face when it comes to trusting the political system. I In this sense, the main objective of this article is to reflect on the harmful effects of the professionalization of the political class and analyze the potential of the sortition as a neutralizing mechanism. In turn, find out if this, through deliberative mini publics, has or not the ability to minimize its harmful excesses and, with it, increase the degree of trust of citizens with their political representatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veritas
Veritas Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: VERITAS, Revista de Filosofía y Teología fue fundada en 1994 por el Pontificio Seminario Mayor San Rafael de Valparaíso (Chile). A partir del año 2017 es una publicación cuatrimestral (Abril, Agosto y Diciembre). El idioma habitual de la revista es el español, aunque queda abierta la posibilidad para publicar artículos en otros idiomas, tales como inglés, francés, italiano o portugués. VERITAS tiene como objetivo difundir entre los académicos y estudiantes del seminario, así como también de otras instituciones eclesiásticas y universitarias, nacionales y extranjeras, el resultado de la investigación en las áreas de la Filosofía y la Teología. Así, y desde su talante católico, pretende llevar a cabo una contribución de actualidad y rigor científico que promueva la reflexión y el debate abierto en la vida académica.
期刊最新文献
Hegel e a analítica da racialidade de Denise Ferreira da Silva doutrina de Hegel da “sociedade civil” e a economia política do Iluminismo Escocês Avicena e o problema do sujeito da metafísica Além do tempo Testemunhar é possível?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1