基于多准则决策方法的多电厂控股公司绩效指标排序与整合新方法

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2022.100254
C.A. Murad , M.M. Bellinello , A.J. Silva , A. Caminada Netto , G.F.M. de Souza , S.I. Nabeta
{"title":"基于多准则决策方法的多电厂控股公司绩效指标排序与整合新方法","authors":"C.A. Murad ,&nbsp;M.M. Bellinello ,&nbsp;A.J. Silva ,&nbsp;A. Caminada Netto ,&nbsp;G.F.M. de Souza ,&nbsp;S.I. Nabeta","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2022.100254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A large international energy corporation owning power operations in several countries, including several generation plants as well as transmission and distribution units in Brazil's energy matrix, adopts for quite some time now the policy that performance monitoring should be left to each individual operation's management. This decentralized approach is viewed as undoubtedly having a number of managerial advantages, so much, so that it is currently in force and performance indicators are being established locally. This approach, however, has the basic disadvantage that quantitative comparisons are hard to make between operations, i.e., adequate tactical comparative assessment at corporate level, with immediate and potential unfavorable implications. Therefore, the present work undertakes to investigate the possibility of consolidating a comprehensive set of indicators capable of accommodating more possibilities of comparison between different power generation plants. The research also employs an effective ranking method in order to take as much managerial advantage as possible of the new body of identified indicators. An application example involving a set of selected indicators is presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000252/pdfft?md5=641fb0057f8854e8641eac8912b9bf2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716022000252-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel methodology employed for ranking and consolidating performance indicators in holding companies with multiple power plants based on multi-criteria decision-making method\",\"authors\":\"C.A. Murad ,&nbsp;M.M. Bellinello ,&nbsp;A.J. Silva ,&nbsp;A. Caminada Netto ,&nbsp;G.F.M. de Souza ,&nbsp;S.I. Nabeta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orp.2022.100254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A large international energy corporation owning power operations in several countries, including several generation plants as well as transmission and distribution units in Brazil's energy matrix, adopts for quite some time now the policy that performance monitoring should be left to each individual operation's management. This decentralized approach is viewed as undoubtedly having a number of managerial advantages, so much, so that it is currently in force and performance indicators are being established locally. This approach, however, has the basic disadvantage that quantitative comparisons are hard to make between operations, i.e., adequate tactical comparative assessment at corporate level, with immediate and potential unfavorable implications. Therefore, the present work undertakes to investigate the possibility of consolidating a comprehensive set of indicators capable of accommodating more possibilities of comparison between different power generation plants. The research also employs an effective ranking method in order to take as much managerial advantage as possible of the new body of identified indicators. An application example involving a set of selected indicators is presented.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research Perspectives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000252/pdfft?md5=641fb0057f8854e8641eac8912b9bf2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716022000252-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000252\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一家大型国际能源公司在几个国家拥有电力业务,包括巴西能源矩阵中的几个发电厂和输配电单位,该公司很长一段时间以来一直采取的政策是,绩效监测应留给每个单独的运营管理。这种分散的办法无疑被认为具有许多管理上的优点,因此目前正在实行,而且正在当地制订业绩指标。然而,这种方法有一个基本的缺点,即难以在各业务之间进行定量比较,即在公司一级进行适当的战术比较评估,具有直接和潜在的不利影响。因此,目前的工作是调查是否可能合并一套全面的指标,以便在不同发电厂之间进行更多的比较。该研究还采用了一种有效的排名方法,以便尽可能多地利用新的确定指标的管理优势。给出了一组选定指标的应用实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel methodology employed for ranking and consolidating performance indicators in holding companies with multiple power plants based on multi-criteria decision-making method

A large international energy corporation owning power operations in several countries, including several generation plants as well as transmission and distribution units in Brazil's energy matrix, adopts for quite some time now the policy that performance monitoring should be left to each individual operation's management. This decentralized approach is viewed as undoubtedly having a number of managerial advantages, so much, so that it is currently in force and performance indicators are being established locally. This approach, however, has the basic disadvantage that quantitative comparisons are hard to make between operations, i.e., adequate tactical comparative assessment at corporate level, with immediate and potential unfavorable implications. Therefore, the present work undertakes to investigate the possibility of consolidating a comprehensive set of indicators capable of accommodating more possibilities of comparison between different power generation plants. The research also employs an effective ranking method in order to take as much managerial advantage as possible of the new body of identified indicators. An application example involving a set of selected indicators is presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
A generalized behavioral-based goal programming approach for decision-making under imprecision δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis Strategizing emissions reduction investment for a livestock production farm amid power demand pattern: A path to sustainable growth under the carbon cap environmental regulation Do jumps matter in discrete-time portfolio optimization? Research on green supply chain finance risk identification based on two-stage deep learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1