联合国人权事务委员会在Francisca Alomar等人诉西班牙一案中的决定:基于国际公法一般制度的批判性分析

Javier Chinchón Álvarez
{"title":"联合国人权事务委员会在Francisca Alomar等人诉西班牙一案中的决定:基于国际公法一般制度的批判性分析","authors":"Javier Chinchón Álvarez","doi":"10.17103/reei.43.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will attempt to critically examine the recent decision of the United Nations Human Rights Committee in the Francisca Alomar et al. v. Spain case based on several key aspects of the general system of the International Responsibility of the State and Law of Treaties. In order to do so, the analysis will be divided into two parts: In the first one, based on the general theory of continuing wrongful acts, the Committee's resolution regarding the allegation presented as indirect victims of reported forced disappearances will be studied. In the second one, the solution offered regarding the consideration of the authors as direct victims of those events will be addressed, using the general principle of exhaustion of domestic remedies as the central piece of analysis.","PeriodicalId":40338,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electronica de Estudios Internacionales","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La decisión del Comité de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas en el caso Francisca Alomar y otros contra España: un análisis crítico a partir del sistema general de Derecho Internacional público\",\"authors\":\"Javier Chinchón Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.17103/reei.43.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article will attempt to critically examine the recent decision of the United Nations Human Rights Committee in the Francisca Alomar et al. v. Spain case based on several key aspects of the general system of the International Responsibility of the State and Law of Treaties. In order to do so, the analysis will be divided into two parts: In the first one, based on the general theory of continuing wrongful acts, the Committee's resolution regarding the allegation presented as indirect victims of reported forced disappearances will be studied. In the second one, the solution offered regarding the consideration of the authors as direct victims of those events will be addressed, using the general principle of exhaustion of domestic remedies as the central piece of analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Electronica de Estudios Internacionales\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Electronica de Estudios Internacionales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.43.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electronica de Estudios Internacionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.43.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将试图根据国家国际责任和条约法的一般制度的几个关键方面,批判性地审查联合国人权事务委员会最近在方济各会Alomar等人诉西班牙案中作出的决定。为了做到这一点,分析将分为两部分:在第一部分中,将根据持续不法行为的一般理论,研究委员会关于被报告为强迫失踪间接受害者的指控的决议。在第二个问题中,将以用尽国内补救办法的一般原则为中心分析,讨论关于将提交人视为这些事件的直接受害者的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La decisión del Comité de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas en el caso Francisca Alomar y otros contra España: un análisis crítico a partir del sistema general de Derecho Internacional público
This article will attempt to critically examine the recent decision of the United Nations Human Rights Committee in the Francisca Alomar et al. v. Spain case based on several key aspects of the general system of the International Responsibility of the State and Law of Treaties. In order to do so, the analysis will be divided into two parts: In the first one, based on the general theory of continuing wrongful acts, the Committee's resolution regarding the allegation presented as indirect victims of reported forced disappearances will be studied. In the second one, the solution offered regarding the consideration of the authors as direct victims of those events will be addressed, using the general principle of exhaustion of domestic remedies as the central piece of analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
MOVILLA PATEIRO, L., La dimensión normativa de la gobernanza internacional del agua dulce, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2021, 425 pp. CUARTERO RUBIO, Mª V. y VELASCO RETAMOSA, J.M. (dirs.), La vida familiar internacional en una Europa compleja: Cuestiones abiertas y problemas de la práctica, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2021, 422 pp. GILES CARNERO, R., El régimen jurídico internacional en materia de cambio climático. Dinámica de avances y limitaciones, Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, Pamplona, 2021, 185 pp. SALINAS DE FRÍAS, A. y PETIT DE GABRIEL, E.W. (Dirs.), GARCÍA ANDRADE, P. y ÁLVAREZ ARCÁ, I. (Coords.), La Corte Penal Internacional 20 años después, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2021, 490 pp. La decisión del Comité de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas en el caso Francisca Alomar y otros contra España: un análisis crítico a partir del sistema general de Derecho Internacional público
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1