黎巴嫩最具破坏性的一次爆炸——恐怖分子计划复制并防范此类事故

IF 1.1 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Applied Security Research Pub Date : 2021-04-10 DOI:10.1080/19361610.2021.1873681
L. Chunlin, R. Gunaratna
{"title":"黎巴嫩最具破坏性的一次爆炸——恐怖分子计划复制并防范此类事故","authors":"L. Chunlin, R. Gunaratna","doi":"10.1080/19361610.2021.1873681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Explosives continue to be the primary tactic used by terrorists across the world and given the high security risk faced by mega infrastructure, a systematic security risk assessment framework is proposed in this paper. Classification and rating criteria are established for this framework pertaining to threat/vulnerability and impact/consequence assessment, based on which asset risk rating can be calculated. The proposed risk assessment framework refines the author’s previous work of risk rating criteria and evaluates risks in both qualitative and quantitative ways. Risk ratings are classified both numerically and in color codes for the ease of analysis and application. This framework is validated in a case study of risk assessment of a mega infrastructure facility and can support further risk management and investment policy. A case study of a chemical facility utilizing the risk assessment framework is provided.","PeriodicalId":44585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Security Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19361610.2021.1873681","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lebanon’s Single Most Destructive Explosion – Terrorists Plan to Copy and Provision against Such Accidents\",\"authors\":\"L. Chunlin, R. Gunaratna\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19361610.2021.1873681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Explosives continue to be the primary tactic used by terrorists across the world and given the high security risk faced by mega infrastructure, a systematic security risk assessment framework is proposed in this paper. Classification and rating criteria are established for this framework pertaining to threat/vulnerability and impact/consequence assessment, based on which asset risk rating can be calculated. The proposed risk assessment framework refines the author’s previous work of risk rating criteria and evaluates risks in both qualitative and quantitative ways. Risk ratings are classified both numerically and in color codes for the ease of analysis and application. This framework is validated in a case study of risk assessment of a mega infrastructure facility and can support further risk management and investment policy. A case study of a chemical facility utilizing the risk assessment framework is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Security Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19361610.2021.1873681\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Security Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1873681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Security Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1873681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要针对大型基础设施面临的高安全风险,本文提出了一个系统的安全风险评估框架。为该框架建立了与威胁/脆弱性和影响/后果评估有关的分类和评级标准,可根据这些标准计算资产风险评级。本文提出的风险评估框架完善了作者之前的风险评级标准,从定性和定量两方面对风险进行评估。为了便于分析和应用,风险等级以数字和颜色代码进行分类。该框架在大型基础设施风险评估的案例研究中得到验证,可以支持进一步的风险管理和投资政策。提供了一个利用风险评估框架的化学设施的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lebanon’s Single Most Destructive Explosion – Terrorists Plan to Copy and Provision against Such Accidents
Abstract Explosives continue to be the primary tactic used by terrorists across the world and given the high security risk faced by mega infrastructure, a systematic security risk assessment framework is proposed in this paper. Classification and rating criteria are established for this framework pertaining to threat/vulnerability and impact/consequence assessment, based on which asset risk rating can be calculated. The proposed risk assessment framework refines the author’s previous work of risk rating criteria and evaluates risks in both qualitative and quantitative ways. Risk ratings are classified both numerically and in color codes for the ease of analysis and application. This framework is validated in a case study of risk assessment of a mega infrastructure facility and can support further risk management and investment policy. A case study of a chemical facility utilizing the risk assessment framework is provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Security Research
Journal of Applied Security Research CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Campus Security and Crime Prevention: A View from a Police Chief with a Ph.D. in Criminology Group-Motivated and Periodic Fire Setting for Terrorism in Urban Landscapes: An Analysis in Time and Space Privacy, Data Protection and Cyber Crimes: Mapping Perceptions of Pakistani Users A Comprehensive Survey of Social Engineering Attacks: Taxonomy of Attacks, Prevention, and Mitigation Strategies Human Rights Policies, Guidelines, and Standards in The Private Security Industry: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1