Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu
{"title":"S曲线:ERP评价的动态视角","authors":"Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":"68 1","pages":"169 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The S curve: A dynamic view of in ERP evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"169 - 188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.
Engineering EconomistENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment.
The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.