S曲线:ERP评价的动态视角

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS Engineering Economist Pub Date : 2023-05-13 DOI:10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080
Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu
{"title":"S曲线:ERP评价的动态视角","authors":"Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The S curve: A dynamic view of in ERP evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的企业资源规划(ERP)评价方法采用闭式解,忽略了ERP生命周期的独特性。我们提出了一个基于模拟和随机过程的生命周期模型来捕捉和评估ERP的价值,包括其他关键因素。我们的研究结果表明,考虑到ERP实施的独特特点,考虑到生命周期,ERP价值不同于传统的智慧,并从各个因素和范围支持决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The S curve: A dynamic view of in ERP evaluation
Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Economist
Engineering Economist ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment. The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.
期刊最新文献
Introducing a real option framework for EVA/MVA analysis Avoiding momentum crashes using stochastic mean-CVaR optimization with time-varying risk aversion The S curve: A dynamic view of in ERP evaluation Optimization-based tail risk hedging of the S&P 500 index Letter from the editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1