调制解调器标记:模式细节是否为支持模式?[Boroom模型标记:?实际上是现代波浪光中最小的粒子?]

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Fontes Linguae Vasconum Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI:10.35462/flv132.9
Sergio Monforte
{"title":"调制解调器标记:模式细节是否为支持模式?[Boroom模型标记:?实际上是现代波浪光中最小的粒子?]","authors":"Sergio Monforte","doi":"10.35462/flv132.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work critically analyses the particles that are usually considered modal in Bascolo-gy, considering their separate behaviour in comparison to the elements that typological-ly have received the same denomination. For this, two morphosyntactic properties have been analysed: a) if they must merge with another component and b) if they can appear in embedded contexts. As for Basque, I have concluded that traditional modal particles (ahal, bide, ei, omen and ote) behave as enclitic modal markers. However, others func-tion in a similar way to the prototypical modal particles, specifically morphologically independent speech act operators: bada, baina, berriz, gero, ordea and eastern ote.\n\nLan honetan euskalaritzan partikula modaltzat hartu ohi direnak modu kritikoan az-tertu dira tipologikoki izendapen bera duten elementuen ondoan aldea ikusita. Bi pro-pietate morfosintaktikori erreparatu zaie: a) ea beste osagai bati atxiki behar dioten eta b) ea mendeko testuinguruetan ager daitezkeen. Euskarari begira, tradizioko partikula modalek (ahal, bide, ei, omen eta ote) markatzaile modal enklitikoen moduan jokatzen dutela ondorioztatu dut. Hala ere, beste batzuek partikula modal prototipikoen antze-ko jokabidea dute; hau da, hizketa-ekintzaren operatzaile morfologikoki beregainak dira: bada, baina, berriz, gero, ordea eta ekialdeko ote hain zuzen.","PeriodicalId":32721,"journal":{"name":"Fontes Linguae Vasconum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modalitate-markatzaileak: partikula modalak ote dira euskarazko partikula modalak? [Marcadores de modalidad: ¿son realmente las partículas modales del vasco partículas modales?]\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Monforte\",\"doi\":\"10.35462/flv132.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work critically analyses the particles that are usually considered modal in Bascolo-gy, considering their separate behaviour in comparison to the elements that typological-ly have received the same denomination. For this, two morphosyntactic properties have been analysed: a) if they must merge with another component and b) if they can appear in embedded contexts. As for Basque, I have concluded that traditional modal particles (ahal, bide, ei, omen and ote) behave as enclitic modal markers. However, others func-tion in a similar way to the prototypical modal particles, specifically morphologically independent speech act operators: bada, baina, berriz, gero, ordea and eastern ote.\\n\\nLan honetan euskalaritzan partikula modaltzat hartu ohi direnak modu kritikoan az-tertu dira tipologikoki izendapen bera duten elementuen ondoan aldea ikusita. Bi pro-pietate morfosintaktikori erreparatu zaie: a) ea beste osagai bati atxiki behar dioten eta b) ea mendeko testuinguruetan ager daitezkeen. Euskarari begira, tradizioko partikula modalek (ahal, bide, ei, omen eta ote) markatzaile modal enklitikoen moduan jokatzen dutela ondorioztatu dut. Hala ere, beste batzuek partikula modal prototipikoen antze-ko jokabidea dute; hau da, hizketa-ekintzaren operatzaile morfologikoki beregainak dira: bada, baina, berriz, gero, ordea eta ekialdeko ote hain zuzen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fontes Linguae Vasconum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fontes Linguae Vasconum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35462/flv132.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fontes Linguae Vasconum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35462/flv132.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作批判性地分析了在Bascolo gy中通常被认为是模态的粒子,考虑到它们与在类型上错误地获得相同名称的元素相比的单独行为。为此,分析了两个形态句法特性:a)它们是否必须与另一个成分合并;b)它们是否可以出现在嵌入的上下文中。至于巴斯克语,我已经得出结论,传统的语气词(ahal、bid、ei、omen和ote)表现为附言语气标记。然而,其他人的功能与原型语气词相似,特别是形态独立的言语行为操作符:是的,但同样,无论是当时还是东方。在这项工作中,那些被用来形成颗粒物模型的人被具有相同类型名称的元素严重扭曲了。我认为,这是一个错误:a)最好是在第二天之前进行测试,b)最好是每天进行测试。看看媒体,我得出结论,传统的模态细节(可能性、路径等)以通谕模型标记的形式发挥作用。然而,其他人的行为与模型原型相同;从形态上讲,这是语言活动的运算符,但不管它是真是假。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modalitate-markatzaileak: partikula modalak ote dira euskarazko partikula modalak? [Marcadores de modalidad: ¿son realmente las partículas modales del vasco partículas modales?]
This work critically analyses the particles that are usually considered modal in Bascolo-gy, considering their separate behaviour in comparison to the elements that typological-ly have received the same denomination. For this, two morphosyntactic properties have been analysed: a) if they must merge with another component and b) if they can appear in embedded contexts. As for Basque, I have concluded that traditional modal particles (ahal, bide, ei, omen and ote) behave as enclitic modal markers. However, others func-tion in a similar way to the prototypical modal particles, specifically morphologically independent speech act operators: bada, baina, berriz, gero, ordea and eastern ote. Lan honetan euskalaritzan partikula modaltzat hartu ohi direnak modu kritikoan az-tertu dira tipologikoki izendapen bera duten elementuen ondoan aldea ikusita. Bi pro-pietate morfosintaktikori erreparatu zaie: a) ea beste osagai bati atxiki behar dioten eta b) ea mendeko testuinguruetan ager daitezkeen. Euskarari begira, tradizioko partikula modalek (ahal, bide, ei, omen eta ote) markatzaile modal enklitikoen moduan jokatzen dutela ondorioztatu dut. Hala ere, beste batzuek partikula modal prototipikoen antze-ko jokabidea dute; hau da, hizketa-ekintzaren operatzaile morfologikoki beregainak dira: bada, baina, berriz, gero, ordea eta ekialdeko ote hain zuzen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fontes Linguae Vasconum
Fontes Linguae Vasconum Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Observaciones sobre la inscripción de la mano de bronce de Irulegi Un enigma envuelto en un misterio: la interpretación lingüística de la mano de Irulegi Kultura zinematografiko bat sortzeko bide luzea: XX. mendeko euskal idazleak zinemaren aitzinean (1910-1980) William Wordsworth’s Sonnets Dedicated to Liberty: the poems about Basque mountaineers Hizkuntzekiko Irakaskuntza Sentsiblearen gaineko usteak: EAEko LHko irakaslegaien iritziak aztergai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1