维基百科=异托邦

IF 1.4 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/13614568.2022.2047800
Michael Flavin
{"title":"维基百科=异托邦","authors":"Michael Flavin","doi":"10.1080/13614568.2022.2047800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper analyses the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia using Michel Foucault’s (1926–1984) concept of heterotopia. In Foucault’s writings, heterotopias are both similar to and distinct from the conditions that give rise to them. The paper undertakes a case study of one entry on Wikipedia (the entry for the “Episteme”) focusing primarily on the main entry and the talk page. The methodology is content analysis with a directed approach: data were gathered in November–December 2020. The paper argues Wikipedia can usefully be analysed as a heterotopia because it exposes the contentious conditions of knowledge production, which is not standard practice for an encyclopaedia. The article adds to our understanding by applying the Foucauldian concept of heterotopia to a specific Wikipedia entry, highlighting how knowledge is produced out of dispute and subjective discourses.","PeriodicalId":54386,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia","volume":"27 1","pages":"324 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wikipedia = Heterotopia\",\"authors\":\"Michael Flavin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13614568.2022.2047800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper analyses the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia using Michel Foucault’s (1926–1984) concept of heterotopia. In Foucault’s writings, heterotopias are both similar to and distinct from the conditions that give rise to them. The paper undertakes a case study of one entry on Wikipedia (the entry for the “Episteme”) focusing primarily on the main entry and the talk page. The methodology is content analysis with a directed approach: data were gathered in November–December 2020. The paper argues Wikipedia can usefully be analysed as a heterotopia because it exposes the contentious conditions of knowledge production, which is not standard practice for an encyclopaedia. The article adds to our understanding by applying the Foucauldian concept of heterotopia to a specific Wikipedia entry, highlighting how knowledge is produced out of dispute and subjective discourses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"324 - 338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2022.2047800\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2022.2047800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文运用米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault, 1926-1984)的异托邦概念对在线百科全书维基百科进行了分析。在福柯的作品中,异托邦与产生它们的条件既相似又不同。本文对维基百科上的一个条目(“Episteme”条目)进行了案例研究,主要关注主条目和讨论页。研究方法是有针对性的内容分析:数据收集于2020年11月至12月。这篇论文认为,维基百科可以作为一个异托邦来分析,因为它暴露了知识生产的有争议的条件,这不是百科全书的标准做法。这篇文章通过将福柯的异托邦概念应用到一个特定的维基百科条目中,增加了我们的理解,强调了知识是如何从争论和主观话语中产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wikipedia = Heterotopia
ABSTRACT This paper analyses the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia using Michel Foucault’s (1926–1984) concept of heterotopia. In Foucault’s writings, heterotopias are both similar to and distinct from the conditions that give rise to them. The paper undertakes a case study of one entry on Wikipedia (the entry for the “Episteme”) focusing primarily on the main entry and the talk page. The methodology is content analysis with a directed approach: data were gathered in November–December 2020. The paper argues Wikipedia can usefully be analysed as a heterotopia because it exposes the contentious conditions of knowledge production, which is not standard practice for an encyclopaedia. The article adds to our understanding by applying the Foucauldian concept of heterotopia to a specific Wikipedia entry, highlighting how knowledge is produced out of dispute and subjective discourses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia
New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia (NRHM) is an interdisciplinary journal providing a focus for research covering practical and theoretical developments in hypermedia, hypertext, and interactive multimedia.
期刊最新文献
Geo-spatial hypertext in virtual reality: mapping and navigating global news event spaces User-centred collecting for emerging formats The evolution of the author—authorship and speculative worldbuilding in Johannes Heldén’s Evolution From “screen-as-writing” theory to Internet culturology. A French perspective on digital textualities Pasifika arts Aotearoa and Wikipedia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1