理想的冲突

IF 0.4 Q4 COMMUNICATION Media History Pub Date : 2022-05-21 DOI:10.1080/13688804.2022.2079483
E. Stjernholm
{"title":"理想的冲突","authors":"E. Stjernholm","doi":"10.1080/13688804.2022.2079483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1969, a government report concluded that there was a need for closer contact between the citizens and Swedish government agencies. Television, at this time still considered a new medium, was highlighted in the report as a valuable form of mass communication with great yet unfulfilled promise as a disseminator of government information. A heated debate about the role and function of government information ensued, not least within the public service broadcaster Sveriges Radio. While much research has been devoted to the Swedish public service model, little is known about Swedish television’s function as a communication tool for government authorities. The article shows that the discursive struggles surrounding Swedish government agencies’ use of television centered on three main issues: public service broadcasting’s independence, the dangers related to one-way mass communication, and the shape and aesthetics of government information. By shedding light on the introduction of the program Anslagstavlan, this article contributes to a previously forsaken media history of televised information.","PeriodicalId":44733,"journal":{"name":"Media History","volume":"28 1","pages":"425 - 441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Clash of Ideals\",\"authors\":\"E. Stjernholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13688804.2022.2079483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1969, a government report concluded that there was a need for closer contact between the citizens and Swedish government agencies. Television, at this time still considered a new medium, was highlighted in the report as a valuable form of mass communication with great yet unfulfilled promise as a disseminator of government information. A heated debate about the role and function of government information ensued, not least within the public service broadcaster Sveriges Radio. While much research has been devoted to the Swedish public service model, little is known about Swedish television’s function as a communication tool for government authorities. The article shows that the discursive struggles surrounding Swedish government agencies’ use of television centered on three main issues: public service broadcasting’s independence, the dangers related to one-way mass communication, and the shape and aesthetics of government information. By shedding light on the introduction of the program Anslagstavlan, this article contributes to a previously forsaken media history of televised information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media History\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"425 - 441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2022.2079483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2022.2079483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1969年,一份政府报告得出结论,认为公民和瑞典政府机构之间有必要加强联系。电视在当时仍被视为一种新媒介,报告强调它是一种有价值的大众传播形式,在传播政府信息方面具有巨大但尚未实现的希望。随之而来的是一场关于政府信息的作用和功能的激烈辩论,尤其是在公共服务广播公司Sveriges Radio内部。虽然对瑞典公共服务模式进行了大量研究,但对瑞典电视作为政府当局沟通工具的功能知之甚少。文章表明,围绕瑞典政府机构使用电视的话语斗争集中在三个主要问题上:公共服务广播的独立性,与单向大众传播相关的危险,以及政府信息的形状和美学。通过对Anslagstavlan节目的介绍,本文对先前被遗忘的电视信息媒体历史做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Clash of Ideals
In 1969, a government report concluded that there was a need for closer contact between the citizens and Swedish government agencies. Television, at this time still considered a new medium, was highlighted in the report as a valuable form of mass communication with great yet unfulfilled promise as a disseminator of government information. A heated debate about the role and function of government information ensued, not least within the public service broadcaster Sveriges Radio. While much research has been devoted to the Swedish public service model, little is known about Swedish television’s function as a communication tool for government authorities. The article shows that the discursive struggles surrounding Swedish government agencies’ use of television centered on three main issues: public service broadcasting’s independence, the dangers related to one-way mass communication, and the shape and aesthetics of government information. By shedding light on the introduction of the program Anslagstavlan, this article contributes to a previously forsaken media history of televised information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Media History
Media History COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
‘I cannot give the name of the source to the court’ The Broadcasted Operating Room Early Medical Television as a Telemedicine Device in the United States, 1939–1960 The Inconspicuous Epidemic: Spanish Flu Discourse in National Newspapers of Soviet Russia (1918–1919) Enlivening Wit Crimean War to Empire’s Fall: The English Periodicals of Late Ottoman Capital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1