重新建构纪录片的受害者:印度媒体集体的纪录片和集体受害者

IF 0.5 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Studies in Documentary Film Pub Date : 2021-02-28 DOI:10.1080/17503280.2021.1887989
S. Kishore
{"title":"重新建构纪录片的受害者:印度媒体集体的纪录片和集体受害者","authors":"S. Kishore","doi":"10.1080/17503280.2021.1887989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT What do we learn about documentary forms, practices and relations when marginalised communities adapt documentary filmmaking to revise their historical conditions? The use of documentary filmmaking by Indian media collective Chalchitra Abhiyan responds to three historical circumstances: socially marginalised groups’ under-representation in media industries, their misrepresentation in mainstream media products and the systematic deployment of mainstream traditional and new media forms to promote religion-based constructions of Indian national identity. In this media ecology, community use of documentary functions for social transformation, through representation and the relationships, methods and practices defined by the needs and goals of otherwise marginalised communities (such as Dalits and Muslims) who use media for functions of visibility and counter-representation. Examining media production and circulation together with the arena of social relations, I contend that ‘embedded aesthetics’ of documentary in this setting involves a representational focus on the collective in agentive processes that use documentary to recognise, deconstruct and reinterpret an accepted victimhood into a form of resistance (Ginsburg, Faye. 1994. ‘Embedded Aesthetics: Creating a Discursive Space for Indigenous Media.’ Cultural Anthropology 9 (3): 365–82). Critiquing individualist social relations of mainstream media, concrete documentary practices re-organise digital and physical modes of media production and circulation by reference social and cultural functions, connecting filmmaking to lived histories of discrimination and possibilities of collective resistance.","PeriodicalId":43545,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Documentary Film","volume":"17 1","pages":"14 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17503280.2021.1887989","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-framing documentary’s victims: documentary and collective victimhood at Indian media collective Chalchitra Abhiyan\",\"authors\":\"S. Kishore\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17503280.2021.1887989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT What do we learn about documentary forms, practices and relations when marginalised communities adapt documentary filmmaking to revise their historical conditions? The use of documentary filmmaking by Indian media collective Chalchitra Abhiyan responds to three historical circumstances: socially marginalised groups’ under-representation in media industries, their misrepresentation in mainstream media products and the systematic deployment of mainstream traditional and new media forms to promote religion-based constructions of Indian national identity. In this media ecology, community use of documentary functions for social transformation, through representation and the relationships, methods and practices defined by the needs and goals of otherwise marginalised communities (such as Dalits and Muslims) who use media for functions of visibility and counter-representation. Examining media production and circulation together with the arena of social relations, I contend that ‘embedded aesthetics’ of documentary in this setting involves a representational focus on the collective in agentive processes that use documentary to recognise, deconstruct and reinterpret an accepted victimhood into a form of resistance (Ginsburg, Faye. 1994. ‘Embedded Aesthetics: Creating a Discursive Space for Indigenous Media.’ Cultural Anthropology 9 (3): 365–82). Critiquing individualist social relations of mainstream media, concrete documentary practices re-organise digital and physical modes of media production and circulation by reference social and cultural functions, connecting filmmaking to lived histories of discrimination and possibilities of collective resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Documentary Film\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"14 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17503280.2021.1887989\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Documentary Film\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2021.1887989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Documentary Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2021.1887989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当边缘化群体通过纪录片制作来修正他们的历史条件时,我们对纪录片的形式、实践和关系有什么了解?印度媒体集体Chalchitra Abhiyan对纪录片制作的使用回应了三种历史环境:社会边缘化群体在媒体行业中的代表性不足,他们在主流媒体产品中的误传,以及主流传统和新媒体形式的系统部署,以促进基于宗教的印度民族认同建构。在这种媒体生态中,社区利用纪录片功能进行社会转型,通过再现和关系、方法和实践来定义其他边缘化社区(如达利特人和穆斯林)的需求和目标,这些社区使用媒体来实现可见性和反再现的功能。通过考察媒体生产和流通以及社会关系的舞台,我认为纪录片的“嵌入式美学”在这种背景下涉及对代理过程中的集体的代表性关注,这种过程使用纪录片来识别、解构和重新解释被接受的受害者身份,使其成为一种抵抗形式(金斯伯格,费耶,1994)。嵌入美学:为本土媒体创造话语空间。文化人类学9(3):365-82。具体的纪录片实践批判了主流媒体的个人主义社会关系,通过参考社会和文化功能,重新组织了媒体生产和流通的数字和物理模式,将电影制作与歧视的生活历史和集体抵抗的可能性联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-framing documentary’s victims: documentary and collective victimhood at Indian media collective Chalchitra Abhiyan
ABSTRACT What do we learn about documentary forms, practices and relations when marginalised communities adapt documentary filmmaking to revise their historical conditions? The use of documentary filmmaking by Indian media collective Chalchitra Abhiyan responds to three historical circumstances: socially marginalised groups’ under-representation in media industries, their misrepresentation in mainstream media products and the systematic deployment of mainstream traditional and new media forms to promote religion-based constructions of Indian national identity. In this media ecology, community use of documentary functions for social transformation, through representation and the relationships, methods and practices defined by the needs and goals of otherwise marginalised communities (such as Dalits and Muslims) who use media for functions of visibility and counter-representation. Examining media production and circulation together with the arena of social relations, I contend that ‘embedded aesthetics’ of documentary in this setting involves a representational focus on the collective in agentive processes that use documentary to recognise, deconstruct and reinterpret an accepted victimhood into a form of resistance (Ginsburg, Faye. 1994. ‘Embedded Aesthetics: Creating a Discursive Space for Indigenous Media.’ Cultural Anthropology 9 (3): 365–82). Critiquing individualist social relations of mainstream media, concrete documentary practices re-organise digital and physical modes of media production and circulation by reference social and cultural functions, connecting filmmaking to lived histories of discrimination and possibilities of collective resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Documentary Film
Studies in Documentary Film FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Documentary Film is the first refereed scholarly journal devoted to the history, theory, criticism and practice of documentary film. In recent years we have witnessed an increased visibility for documentary film through conferences, the success of general theatrical releases and the re-emergence of scholarship in documentary film studies. Studies in Documentary Film is a peer-reviewed journal.
期刊最新文献
‘And then … ’: new media’s conspiracy theories and counternarratives in Loose Change and The Power of Nightmares South Korean Documentary Cinema and remembrance: the past in the present, at Jeonju Film Festival 2024 The image of the absent narrators: personal migrant memories in Žilnik’s docu-experiments Exploring the empathic potential of 360-degree documentary The cinema of Rithy Panh: everything has a soul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1