罗马尼亚潜在的可达性模型和规划政策设计:固定模型的参数是否会导致错误的解释?

A. Rusu, O. Groza, Radu Necșuliu
{"title":"罗马尼亚潜在的可达性模型和规划政策设计:固定模型的参数是否会导致错误的解释?","authors":"A. Rusu, O. Groza, Radu Necșuliu","doi":"10.15551/pesd2021151010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the differences between two different types of potential accessibility models applied to the urban system of Romania, using demographic data from 2015. The first model is based on a classical formalization of the potential accessibility function, while the second one focuses on the introduction of variable parameters in the model’s equation. When mapping the results, one will found that the models we investigated respond to different needs and visions in spatial planning. The alternative formalization provides a frame for a more in-depth analysis of the transportation endowment, at regional scale, together with an assessment of the urban systems hierarchy. The study highlights the fragility of the local urban systems gravitating around small cities, placed in precarious accessibility situations. The results can be used for a better assessment of the policy priorities, both from the perspective of spatial planning and sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":42850,"journal":{"name":"Present Environment and Sustainable Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential accessibility models and planning policy design in Romania: Are the fixed model’s parameters leading to wrong interpretations?\",\"authors\":\"A. Rusu, O. Groza, Radu Necșuliu\",\"doi\":\"10.15551/pesd2021151010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the differences between two different types of potential accessibility models applied to the urban system of Romania, using demographic data from 2015. The first model is based on a classical formalization of the potential accessibility function, while the second one focuses on the introduction of variable parameters in the model’s equation. When mapping the results, one will found that the models we investigated respond to different needs and visions in spatial planning. The alternative formalization provides a frame for a more in-depth analysis of the transportation endowment, at regional scale, together with an assessment of the urban systems hierarchy. The study highlights the fragility of the local urban systems gravitating around small cities, placed in precarious accessibility situations. The results can be used for a better assessment of the policy priorities, both from the perspective of spatial planning and sustainable development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Present Environment and Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Present Environment and Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15551/pesd2021151010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Present Environment and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15551/pesd2021151010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用罗马尼亚2015年的人口统计数据,探讨了两种不同类型的潜在可达性模型在罗马尼亚城市系统中的差异。第一个模型基于潜在可达性函数的经典形式化,而第二个模型侧重于在模型方程中引入可变参数。当绘制结果时,人们会发现我们调查的模型响应了空间规划的不同需求和愿景。另一种形式化方法提供了一个框架,可以在区域尺度上更深入地分析交通禀赋,并对城市系统等级进行评估。该研究强调了围绕小城市的地方城市系统的脆弱性,这些城市处于不稳定的可达性状况。研究结果可用于从空间规划和可持续发展的角度更好地评估政策重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Potential accessibility models and planning policy design in Romania: Are the fixed model’s parameters leading to wrong interpretations?
This paper explores the differences between two different types of potential accessibility models applied to the urban system of Romania, using demographic data from 2015. The first model is based on a classical formalization of the potential accessibility function, while the second one focuses on the introduction of variable parameters in the model’s equation. When mapping the results, one will found that the models we investigated respond to different needs and visions in spatial planning. The alternative formalization provides a frame for a more in-depth analysis of the transportation endowment, at regional scale, together with an assessment of the urban systems hierarchy. The study highlights the fragility of the local urban systems gravitating around small cities, placed in precarious accessibility situations. The results can be used for a better assessment of the policy priorities, both from the perspective of spatial planning and sustainable development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
3
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of leadership actions for Environmental Stewardship Enhancement in public schools The use of spectral techniques to monitor the vegetation status in a protected area in the Iasi county Sand winds effect on the degradation of photovoltaic modules in desert environments - PART I: Simulator design and Database creating Quantitative tools to assess climatic impact on energy consumption. Case study: Bucharest town area Walking where men walk: gendered politics of smallholder agriculture in Zimbabwe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1