民主保护背景下的激进检测工具

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politicke Vedy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.24040/politickevedy.2023.26.1.63-94
Štěpán Strnad
{"title":"民主保护背景下的激进检测工具","authors":"Štěpán Strnad","doi":"10.24040/politickevedy.2023.26.1.63-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article tries to evaluate the state of professional development and conceptualization of the issue of violent radicalization with the use of used diagnostic tools for detection of the process of violent radicalization. The author compares the selected models of radicalization and selected tools of radicalization detection used in prisons, while evaluating their application positives and negatives and drawing attention to their specific aspects of practical applicability of security practices. The theoretical framing of the chosen phenomenon of radicalization is based on the political-legal concept of militant democracy, the elements of which are applied to varying degrees in the anti-extremist and anti-radicalization policy of the states of Central Europe, including the Czech Republic. The aim of the contribution is a comparative analysis of the selected detection tools at the micro level, specifically the so-called structured protocols for assessing the risk of extremist violence. The author aims to provide a comprehensive and comparative overview of selected tools used in risk assessment through three dimensions: (1) the purpose of the tools; 2) basic methodology and structure of tools; and (3) the practical results of using these tools. Despite the use of radicalization identification tools, this method of evaluating predispositions to violent extremism is still in its infancy. Reflecting on the research questions raised, we can summarize that the purpose of the compared detection tools is the detection of risk levels that have led or could lead to violent extremism or terrorism in a person serving a sentence.","PeriodicalId":42158,"journal":{"name":"Politicke Vedy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radicalization Detection Tools in the Context of Democracy Protection\",\"authors\":\"Štěpán Strnad\",\"doi\":\"10.24040/politickevedy.2023.26.1.63-94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article tries to evaluate the state of professional development and conceptualization of the issue of violent radicalization with the use of used diagnostic tools for detection of the process of violent radicalization. The author compares the selected models of radicalization and selected tools of radicalization detection used in prisons, while evaluating their application positives and negatives and drawing attention to their specific aspects of practical applicability of security practices. The theoretical framing of the chosen phenomenon of radicalization is based on the political-legal concept of militant democracy, the elements of which are applied to varying degrees in the anti-extremist and anti-radicalization policy of the states of Central Europe, including the Czech Republic. The aim of the contribution is a comparative analysis of the selected detection tools at the micro level, specifically the so-called structured protocols for assessing the risk of extremist violence. The author aims to provide a comprehensive and comparative overview of selected tools used in risk assessment through three dimensions: (1) the purpose of the tools; 2) basic methodology and structure of tools; and (3) the practical results of using these tools. Despite the use of radicalization identification tools, this method of evaluating predispositions to violent extremism is still in its infancy. Reflecting on the research questions raised, we can summarize that the purpose of the compared detection tools is the detection of risk levels that have led or could lead to violent extremism or terrorism in a person serving a sentence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politicke Vedy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politicke Vedy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2023.26.1.63-94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicke Vedy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2023.26.1.63-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图通过使用二手诊断工具来检测暴力激进化的过程,来评估暴力激进化问题的专业发展和概念化状态。作者比较了监狱中使用的激进化模型和激进化检测工具,同时评估了它们的积极和消极应用,并提请注意它们在安全实践中的具体适用性。所选择的激进化现象的理论框架是基于激进民主的政治法律概念,其中的要素在包括捷克共和国在内的中欧各国的反极端主义和反激进化政策中都有不同程度的应用。贡献的目的是在微观层面对选定的检测工具,特别是评估极端主义暴力风险的所谓结构化协议进行比较分析。作者旨在从三个方面对风险评估中使用的选定工具进行全面和比较的概述:(1)工具的目的;2) 工具的基本方法和结构;以及(3)使用这些工具的实际结果。尽管使用了激进化识别工具,但这种评估暴力极端主义倾向的方法仍处于初级阶段。反思提出的研究问题,我们可以总结出,比较检测工具的目的是检测服刑人员中已经或可能导致暴力极端主义或恐怖主义的风险水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radicalization Detection Tools in the Context of Democracy Protection
The article tries to evaluate the state of professional development and conceptualization of the issue of violent radicalization with the use of used diagnostic tools for detection of the process of violent radicalization. The author compares the selected models of radicalization and selected tools of radicalization detection used in prisons, while evaluating their application positives and negatives and drawing attention to their specific aspects of practical applicability of security practices. The theoretical framing of the chosen phenomenon of radicalization is based on the political-legal concept of militant democracy, the elements of which are applied to varying degrees in the anti-extremist and anti-radicalization policy of the states of Central Europe, including the Czech Republic. The aim of the contribution is a comparative analysis of the selected detection tools at the micro level, specifically the so-called structured protocols for assessing the risk of extremist violence. The author aims to provide a comprehensive and comparative overview of selected tools used in risk assessment through three dimensions: (1) the purpose of the tools; 2) basic methodology and structure of tools; and (3) the practical results of using these tools. Despite the use of radicalization identification tools, this method of evaluating predispositions to violent extremism is still in its infancy. Reflecting on the research questions raised, we can summarize that the purpose of the compared detection tools is the detection of risk levels that have led or could lead to violent extremism or terrorism in a person serving a sentence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politicke Vedy
Politicke Vedy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Humanitarian Interventions after 1945: Multilateralism, Success Rate and the Impact of the Intervention on the Democratization Process of the Impacted States International Conference on Human Rights: “HUMAN FORUM 2022 Spreading the Standards and Values of the European Union beyond the Borders of the European Integration Area Book Review: Difficult Women: A History of Feminism in 11 Fights The Paradoxes of Preferential Voting and the Possibility of Strengthening the Electoral Vote in the Slovak Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1