“进步的”公私伙伴关系:是改革还是倒退?

IF 1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Works Management & Policy Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/1087724X221106164
Carter B. Casady, M. Garvin
{"title":"“进步的”公私伙伴关系:是改革还是倒退?","authors":"Carter B. Casady, M. Garvin","doi":"10.1177/1087724X221106164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In North America, public-private partnerships (P3s) are increasingly using pre-development agreements to enhance collaboration between the public and private sectors. Known colloquially as “progressive P3s”, these agreements allow the private sector to help scope and shape the structure of projects at the front end. However, concerns about their efficacy persist. Our Commentary contextualizes this ongoing debate by outlining the potential benefits and pitfalls of this new approach to P3s. We conclude that both practitioners and academics have a crucial role to play in our experience with and understanding of the progressive P3 experiment.","PeriodicalId":45483,"journal":{"name":"Public Works Management & Policy","volume":"27 1","pages":"342 - 346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Progressive” Public-Private Partnerships: Are They Reformative or Regressive!?\",\"authors\":\"Carter B. Casady, M. Garvin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1087724X221106164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In North America, public-private partnerships (P3s) are increasingly using pre-development agreements to enhance collaboration between the public and private sectors. Known colloquially as “progressive P3s”, these agreements allow the private sector to help scope and shape the structure of projects at the front end. However, concerns about their efficacy persist. Our Commentary contextualizes this ongoing debate by outlining the potential benefits and pitfalls of this new approach to P3s. We conclude that both practitioners and academics have a crucial role to play in our experience with and understanding of the progressive P3 experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Works Management & Policy\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"342 - 346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Works Management & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X221106164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Works Management & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X221106164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在北美,公私伙伴关系越来越多地利用开发前协议来加强公共和私营部门之间的合作。这些协议通常被称为“渐进式p3”,允许私营部门在前端帮助确定和塑造项目结构。然而,对其功效的担忧仍然存在。我们的评论通过概述这种P3s新方法的潜在好处和缺陷,将这场正在进行的辩论置于背景中。我们的结论是,在我们对渐进式P3实验的经验和理解中,从业者和学者都发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Progressive” Public-Private Partnerships: Are They Reformative or Regressive!?
In North America, public-private partnerships (P3s) are increasingly using pre-development agreements to enhance collaboration between the public and private sectors. Known colloquially as “progressive P3s”, these agreements allow the private sector to help scope and shape the structure of projects at the front end. However, concerns about their efficacy persist. Our Commentary contextualizes this ongoing debate by outlining the potential benefits and pitfalls of this new approach to P3s. We conclude that both practitioners and academics have a crucial role to play in our experience with and understanding of the progressive P3 experiment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Works Management & Policy
Public Works Management & Policy PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TRANSPORTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT is a peer-reviewed journal for academics and practitioners in public works and the public and private infrastructure industries. This journal addresses the planning, financing, development, and operations of civil infrastructure systems at all levels of society— from federal policy to the demand for, and delivery of, state and local public works services. PWMP solicits manuscripts that convey research results, evaluate management innovations, suggest methods of analysis and evaluation, and examine policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Politics, Policy, and Pain: Paying for Infrastructure in Pressing Times Risky Decisions Over Troubled Waters: Public Works Directors’ Sea Level Rise Risk Attitudes Changing Tides and Changing Winds: A Time to Change Gears Persisting Cost Overruns in Public Infrastructure Projects: Lessons From the Belgian Case The Impact of Leadership Behaviour on Management Effectiveness in Public Construction Project Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1