葬礼、纪念活动和丧亲护理

Q3 Nursing Bereavement Care Pub Date : 2019-09-02 DOI:10.1080/02682621.2019.1681637
Bruce Rumbold, J. Lowe, S. Aoun
{"title":"葬礼、纪念活动和丧亲护理","authors":"Bruce Rumbold, J. Lowe, S. Aoun","doi":"10.1080/02682621.2019.1681637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A population survey finds that bereaved people draw upon diverse sources of support in their communities, from both formal services and informal networks of care. The formal service most frequently recognised by participants is provided by funeral directors. We outline some reasons for this, and explore one particular theme, memorialisation, in which funeral providers have traditionally been a lead discipline. Significant changes in memorialisation over recent decades challenge today’s funeral industry, but also draw our attention to underlying social changes reshaping our understanding not only of bereavement care but of care in general. Bereavement support is most effective when provided collaboratively by formal and informal care providers, but collaboration is challenged by policies that continue to privilege formal services over informal care. This challenge of developing constructive, respectful and complementary collaborations between formal and informal care is not peculiar to bereavement care, but is a social policy imperative for contemporary societies.","PeriodicalId":44115,"journal":{"name":"Bereavement Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02682621.2019.1681637","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Funerals, memorials and bereavement care\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Rumbold, J. Lowe, S. Aoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02682621.2019.1681637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A population survey finds that bereaved people draw upon diverse sources of support in their communities, from both formal services and informal networks of care. The formal service most frequently recognised by participants is provided by funeral directors. We outline some reasons for this, and explore one particular theme, memorialisation, in which funeral providers have traditionally been a lead discipline. Significant changes in memorialisation over recent decades challenge today’s funeral industry, but also draw our attention to underlying social changes reshaping our understanding not only of bereavement care but of care in general. Bereavement support is most effective when provided collaboratively by formal and informal care providers, but collaboration is challenged by policies that continue to privilege formal services over informal care. This challenge of developing constructive, respectful and complementary collaborations between formal and informal care is not peculiar to bereavement care, but is a social policy imperative for contemporary societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bereavement Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02682621.2019.1681637\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bereavement Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2019.1681637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bereavement Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2019.1681637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

一项人口调查发现,失去亲人的人在社区中利用各种来源的支持,包括正式服务和非正式的护理网络。最常被参与者认可的正式服务是由葬礼承办人提供的。我们概述了一些原因,并探讨了一个特定的主题,纪念,其中葬礼提供者传统上一直是主要学科。近几十年来,纪念活动的重大变化挑战了今天的殡葬业,但也引起了我们对潜在社会变化的关注,这些变化不仅重塑了我们对丧亲护理的理解,而且重塑了我们对一般护理的理解。当正式和非正式护理提供者合作提供丧亲支持时,合作是最有效的,但由于政策继续将正式服务置于非正式护理之上,合作受到了挑战。在正式和非正式护理之间发展建设性、尊重和互补的合作,这一挑战并非丧亲护理所特有,而是当代社会的一项社会政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Funerals, memorials and bereavement care
ABSTRACT A population survey finds that bereaved people draw upon diverse sources of support in their communities, from both formal services and informal networks of care. The formal service most frequently recognised by participants is provided by funeral directors. We outline some reasons for this, and explore one particular theme, memorialisation, in which funeral providers have traditionally been a lead discipline. Significant changes in memorialisation over recent decades challenge today’s funeral industry, but also draw our attention to underlying social changes reshaping our understanding not only of bereavement care but of care in general. Bereavement support is most effective when provided collaboratively by formal and informal care providers, but collaboration is challenged by policies that continue to privilege formal services over informal care. This challenge of developing constructive, respectful and complementary collaborations between formal and informal care is not peculiar to bereavement care, but is a social policy imperative for contemporary societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bereavement Care
Bereavement Care SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘It would be quite good if there was somewhere that just did everything’: perspectives on death administration following a bereavement The impact of Covid-19 on bereavement care in Ireland: A national survey of bereavement care providers. The experience and support needs of adult family members who face a sudden adult death: A systematic review study wound that doesn't heal Reflections on some learning from the Covid-19 pandemic:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1