雷莫司琼、昂丹司琼和格拉司琼减轻腰段剖宫产术后产妇低血压的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究

Suvina Narendra, Dipali Singh, J. Prakash, S. Priye, Shailesh Kumar, B. Bharati
{"title":"雷莫司琼、昂丹司琼和格拉司琼减轻腰段剖宫产术后产妇低血压的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究","authors":"Suvina Narendra, Dipali Singh, J. Prakash, S. Priye, Shailesh Kumar, B. Bharati","doi":"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_91_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) has many advantages in lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), but hypotension is the main issue that can be managed in different ways. This study was conducted to know the effectiveness of three intravenous serotonin receptor antagonists (ramosetron, ondansetron, and granisetron) in the prevention of bradycardia and hypotension during LSCS under SA. Patients and Methods: A total of 160 parturients posted for LSCS under SA were enrolled in this study and divided equally into four groups. Five minutes before SA, Group R received intravenous (IV) 0.3 mg ramosetron, Group O received 4 mg ondansetron IV, Group G received 1 mg granisetron IV, and Group S received IV normal saline. All solutions were diluted with normal saline to 5 mL to blind the drugs. Heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were recorded. The total consumption of vasopressor and side effects were recorded. Results: The decrease in mean arterial pressure and mean HR was significantly lower in group R than other groups at all intervals (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension was 25% in group R compared with 42.5%, 55%, and 72.5% in groups O, G, and S, respectively. Conclusion: Premedication with intravenous ramosetron significantly reduced hypotension, HR, and total vasopressor usage in LSCS parturients. Intravenous ondansetron and granisetron had lesser effects than ramosetron.","PeriodicalId":8691,"journal":{"name":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of ramosetron, ondansetron, and granisetron in attenuating maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study\",\"authors\":\"Suvina Narendra, Dipali Singh, J. Prakash, S. Priye, Shailesh Kumar, B. Bharati\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_91_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) has many advantages in lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), but hypotension is the main issue that can be managed in different ways. This study was conducted to know the effectiveness of three intravenous serotonin receptor antagonists (ramosetron, ondansetron, and granisetron) in the prevention of bradycardia and hypotension during LSCS under SA. Patients and Methods: A total of 160 parturients posted for LSCS under SA were enrolled in this study and divided equally into four groups. Five minutes before SA, Group R received intravenous (IV) 0.3 mg ramosetron, Group O received 4 mg ondansetron IV, Group G received 1 mg granisetron IV, and Group S received IV normal saline. All solutions were diluted with normal saline to 5 mL to blind the drugs. Heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were recorded. The total consumption of vasopressor and side effects were recorded. Results: The decrease in mean arterial pressure and mean HR was significantly lower in group R than other groups at all intervals (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension was 25% in group R compared with 42.5%, 55%, and 72.5% in groups O, G, and S, respectively. Conclusion: Premedication with intravenous ramosetron significantly reduced hypotension, HR, and total vasopressor usage in LSCS parturients. Intravenous ondansetron and granisetron had lesser effects than ramosetron.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_91_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bali Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_91_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰麻(SA)在下段剖腹产(LSCS)中有许多优点,但低血压是主要问题,可以通过不同的方法进行治疗。本研究旨在了解三种静脉注射5-羟色胺受体拮抗剂(拉莫司琼、昂丹司琼和格拉司琼)在SA下LSCS期间预防心动过缓和低血压的有效性。患者和方法:共有160名SA下接受LSCS的产妇被纳入本研究,并平均分为四组。SA前5分钟,R组接受静脉注射(IV)0.3 mg拉莫司琼,O组接受4 mg昂丹司琼IV,G组接受1 mg格拉司琼IV组和S组接受IV生理盐水。所有溶液均用生理盐水稀释至5 mL以使药物失明。记录心率(HR)、收缩压和舒张压以及平均动脉压。记录血管升压药的总消耗量和副作用。结果:R组各时间段的平均动脉压和平均HR下降均显著低于其他组(P<0.05),低血压发生率R组为25%,而O、G和S组分别为42.5%、55%和72.5%。结论:静脉注射雷莫司琼可显著降低LSCS产妇的低血压、HR和总血管升压药的使用。静脉注射昂丹司琼和格拉司琼的疗效比雷莫司琼差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of ramosetron, ondansetron, and granisetron in attenuating maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study
Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) has many advantages in lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), but hypotension is the main issue that can be managed in different ways. This study was conducted to know the effectiveness of three intravenous serotonin receptor antagonists (ramosetron, ondansetron, and granisetron) in the prevention of bradycardia and hypotension during LSCS under SA. Patients and Methods: A total of 160 parturients posted for LSCS under SA were enrolled in this study and divided equally into four groups. Five minutes before SA, Group R received intravenous (IV) 0.3 mg ramosetron, Group O received 4 mg ondansetron IV, Group G received 1 mg granisetron IV, and Group S received IV normal saline. All solutions were diluted with normal saline to 5 mL to blind the drugs. Heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure were recorded. The total consumption of vasopressor and side effects were recorded. Results: The decrease in mean arterial pressure and mean HR was significantly lower in group R than other groups at all intervals (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension was 25% in group R compared with 42.5%, 55%, and 72.5% in groups O, G, and S, respectively. Conclusion: Premedication with intravenous ramosetron significantly reduced hypotension, HR, and total vasopressor usage in LSCS parturients. Intravenous ondansetron and granisetron had lesser effects than ramosetron.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology
Bali Journal of Anesthesiology Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Selective Critically ill patients with tracheostomy are eligible for direct from intensive care unit sent home: Case series Comment on: Effects of different anesthetic techniques on neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and monocyte lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized study Low procalcitonin clearance correlates with mortality treated with culture-matched antibiotics in intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study Phenylephrine, ondansetron, or combination of both for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section: A prospective, double-blind randomized control trial Artificial intelligence in anesthesia and critical care (part 1): Current perspective in critical care setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1