谈判天生的数字:一个搜索问题

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Archives and Manuscripts Pub Date : 2019-08-11 DOI:10.1080/01576895.2019.1640753
J. Winters, A. Prescott
{"title":"谈判天生的数字:一个搜索问题","authors":"J. Winters, A. Prescott","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1640753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Contemporary approaches to the investigation of digital resources are dominated by the paradigm of free-form natural language search, popularised by Google. The Google form of searching has shaped our view of digital possibilities and profoundly affects our search and research habits. Yet in early pioneering work which led to the digital revolution of the 1990s, search was not a major consideration and there was a stronger emphasis on linking files. With the rise of very large born-digital resources such as e-mail archives, Wikileak dumps and web archives, the limitations of Google-type searching are becoming more evident. This paper reviews the limitations of search in exploring born-digital archives and starts to sketch out possible approaches to an alternative. It is suggested that a return to digital roots, by renewing the interest of pioneers such as Vannevar Bush and Ted Nelson in the linking of files, may provide one approach to born-digital archives.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1640753","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiating the born-digital: a problem of search\",\"authors\":\"J. Winters, A. Prescott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01576895.2019.1640753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Contemporary approaches to the investigation of digital resources are dominated by the paradigm of free-form natural language search, popularised by Google. The Google form of searching has shaped our view of digital possibilities and profoundly affects our search and research habits. Yet in early pioneering work which led to the digital revolution of the 1990s, search was not a major consideration and there was a stronger emphasis on linking files. With the rise of very large born-digital resources such as e-mail archives, Wikileak dumps and web archives, the limitations of Google-type searching are becoming more evident. This paper reviews the limitations of search in exploring born-digital archives and starts to sketch out possible approaches to an alternative. It is suggested that a return to digital roots, by renewing the interest of pioneers such as Vannevar Bush and Ted Nelson in the linking of files, may provide one approach to born-digital archives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives and Manuscripts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1640753\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives and Manuscripts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1640753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1640753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

当代数字资源调查的方法是由b谷歌推广的自由形式自然语言搜索范式主导的。谷歌搜索形式塑造了我们对数字可能性的看法,并深刻影响了我们的搜索和研究习惯。然而,在导致20世纪90年代数字革命的早期开创性工作中,搜索并不是主要考虑因素,而是更强调文件链接。随着电子邮件档案、维基解密转储和网络档案等大型原生数字资源的兴起,谷歌式搜索的局限性正变得越来越明显。本文回顾了搜索在探索原生数字档案方面的局限性,并开始概述可能的替代方法。有人建议,通过重新激发Vannevar Bush和Ted Nelson等先驱对文件链接的兴趣,回归数字根源,可能为数字化档案的诞生提供一种途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Negotiating the born-digital: a problem of search
ABSTRACT Contemporary approaches to the investigation of digital resources are dominated by the paradigm of free-form natural language search, popularised by Google. The Google form of searching has shaped our view of digital possibilities and profoundly affects our search and research habits. Yet in early pioneering work which led to the digital revolution of the 1990s, search was not a major consideration and there was a stronger emphasis on linking files. With the rise of very large born-digital resources such as e-mail archives, Wikileak dumps and web archives, the limitations of Google-type searching are becoming more evident. This paper reviews the limitations of search in exploring born-digital archives and starts to sketch out possible approaches to an alternative. It is suggested that a return to digital roots, by renewing the interest of pioneers such as Vannevar Bush and Ted Nelson in the linking of files, may provide one approach to born-digital archives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives and Manuscripts
Archives and Manuscripts INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Transitioning to open access The Indigenous Archives Collective position statement on the right of reply to Indigenous knowledges and information held in archives Activating and supporting the Tandanya Adelaide Declaration on Indigenous Archives Rancière, political theory and activist community appraisal Towards Transformative Practice in Out of Home Care: Chartering Rights in Recordkeeping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1