经济增长和发展的渠道?探讨南非、巴西加入金砖国家问题。

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politikon Pub Date : 2021-04-15 DOI:10.1080/02589346.2021.1913555
Nqophisa Diko, Norman Sempijja
{"title":"经济增长和发展的渠道?探讨南非、巴西加入金砖国家问题。","authors":"Nqophisa Diko, Norman Sempijja","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2021.1913555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For decades, the most used mainstream model for economic growth and development was that used and promoted by the global north. However, this model has not seen the same results in the developing global south as it has in the developed global north. BRICS emerged as an organisation that presented an alternative means to the global north’s approach to economic growth and development. This article examines whether BRICS membership has fostered the economic growth and development of South Africa and Brazil. This article examines the five years before and after Brazil and South Africa joined BRICS. Key findings of the study are that economic growth and development gains have been minimal. The study concludes that Brazil and South Africa have achieved political gains from their BRICS membership, which is considered to offset the absence of tangible economic growth and development gains.","PeriodicalId":45047,"journal":{"name":"Politikon","volume":"48 1","pages":"355 - 371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02589346.2021.1913555","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conduit for Economic Growth and Development? Exploring South Africa and Brazil’s BRICS Membership.\",\"authors\":\"Nqophisa Diko, Norman Sempijja\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589346.2021.1913555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT For decades, the most used mainstream model for economic growth and development was that used and promoted by the global north. However, this model has not seen the same results in the developing global south as it has in the developed global north. BRICS emerged as an organisation that presented an alternative means to the global north’s approach to economic growth and development. This article examines whether BRICS membership has fostered the economic growth and development of South Africa and Brazil. This article examines the five years before and after Brazil and South Africa joined BRICS. Key findings of the study are that economic growth and development gains have been minimal. The study concludes that Brazil and South Africa have achieved political gains from their BRICS membership, which is considered to offset the absence of tangible economic growth and development gains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politikon\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"355 - 371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02589346.2021.1913555\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politikon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.1913555\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politikon","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2021.1913555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要几十年来,最常用的主流经济增长和发展模式是全球北方使用和推广的模式。然而,这种模式在发展中的全球南方并没有看到与发达的全球北方相同的结果。金砖国家是一个为全球北方经济增长和发展提供替代手段的组织。本文考察了金砖国家成员资格是否促进了南非和巴西的经济增长和发展。本文考察了巴西和南非加入金砖国家前后的五年。该研究的主要发现是,经济增长和发展收益微乎其微。该研究得出结论,巴西和南非从其金砖国家成员国身份中获得了政治利益,这被认为抵消了缺乏切实的经济增长和发展成果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conduit for Economic Growth and Development? Exploring South Africa and Brazil’s BRICS Membership.
ABSTRACT For decades, the most used mainstream model for economic growth and development was that used and promoted by the global north. However, this model has not seen the same results in the developing global south as it has in the developed global north. BRICS emerged as an organisation that presented an alternative means to the global north’s approach to economic growth and development. This article examines whether BRICS membership has fostered the economic growth and development of South Africa and Brazil. This article examines the five years before and after Brazil and South Africa joined BRICS. Key findings of the study are that economic growth and development gains have been minimal. The study concludes that Brazil and South Africa have achieved political gains from their BRICS membership, which is considered to offset the absence of tangible economic growth and development gains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Politikon
Politikon POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Politikon focuses primarily on South African politics, but not exclusively so. Over the years the journal has published articles by some of the world" leading political scientists, including Arend Lijphart, Samuel Huntingdon, and Philippe Schmitter. It has also featured important contributions from South Africa"s leading political philosophers, political scientists and international relations experts. It has proved an influential journal, particularly in debates over the merits of South Africa"s constitutional reforms (in 1983 and 1994). In the last few years special issues have focused on women and politics in South Africa, and the South African election of 1999.
期刊最新文献
Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries Combatants in African conflicts, professionals, praetorians, militias, insurgents and mercenaries , by, Simon David Taylor, London, Routledge, May 2022, 248pp., £130.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781351065467 Amin’s progressive internationalism EU sanctions on Zimbabwe: rethinking Africa’s economic and political security in the global age Beyond the debate: decolonisation, decoloniality and the reframing of development in Africa Between Samir Amin and Claude Ake: towards a roadmap for Africa’s development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1