系统文献综述:精益制造绩效的理论视角

IF 1.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Management Systems in Production Engineering Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.2478/mspe-2023-0025
N. Aripin, G. Nawanir, F. Mahmud, Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, S. Hussain, Khai-Loon Lee
{"title":"系统文献综述:精益制造绩效的理论视角","authors":"N. Aripin, G. Nawanir, F. Mahmud, Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, S. Hussain, Khai-Loon Lee","doi":"10.2478/mspe-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This review examines the trend of applying theories in LM performance and offers the latest recapitulation of related theories in LM performance. The methodology is based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) to search for multiple scientific information databases and to guarantee that no important study is overlooked. For the single theory, highly employed theories were the Theory of Constraints, Resource-based View/Natural Resource-based View Theory (RBV/NRBV), and Contingency Theory (CT). Meanwhile, several articles employed integrations of several theories in a publication. Concerning the year of publication, significant growth in articles with underpinned theories was published from 2020 onwards. This study offers several significant contributions to researchers to widen the knowledge related to the adaptation of theories in the field of lean performance, as research underpinned by a theory offers a solid and convincing result in investigating the research problems. The first limitation was the search string to identify the related articles, which could be extended to maximize the article search. The other limitation was the database used which was limited to the Scopus database. Despite the importance of underpinning theory in research, OM has been criticized for the inadequacies of its theory, with only one-third of OM research incorporating theory. However, a limited review was conducted on the theories used in LM performance theory. To reduce this gap, this review examines the trend of applying theories in LM performance and offers the latest recapitulation of related theories in LM performance.","PeriodicalId":44097,"journal":{"name":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Literature Review: Theory Perspective in Lean Manufacturing Performance\",\"authors\":\"N. Aripin, G. Nawanir, F. Mahmud, Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, S. Hussain, Khai-Loon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/mspe-2023-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This review examines the trend of applying theories in LM performance and offers the latest recapitulation of related theories in LM performance. The methodology is based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) to search for multiple scientific information databases and to guarantee that no important study is overlooked. For the single theory, highly employed theories were the Theory of Constraints, Resource-based View/Natural Resource-based View Theory (RBV/NRBV), and Contingency Theory (CT). Meanwhile, several articles employed integrations of several theories in a publication. Concerning the year of publication, significant growth in articles with underpinned theories was published from 2020 onwards. This study offers several significant contributions to researchers to widen the knowledge related to the adaptation of theories in the field of lean performance, as research underpinned by a theory offers a solid and convincing result in investigating the research problems. The first limitation was the search string to identify the related articles, which could be extended to maximize the article search. The other limitation was the database used which was limited to the Scopus database. Despite the importance of underpinning theory in research, OM has been criticized for the inadequacies of its theory, with only one-third of OM research incorporating theory. However, a limited review was conducted on the theories used in LM performance theory. To reduce this gap, this review examines the trend of applying theories in LM performance and offers the latest recapitulation of related theories in LM performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Systems in Production Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Systems in Production Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2023-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文综述了LM绩效理论的应用趋势,并对LM绩效的相关理论进行了最新的综述。该方法基于系统评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA),以搜索多个科学信息数据库,并确保不会忽视任何重要研究。对于单一理论,被广泛采用的理论有约束理论、基于资源的观点/基于自然资源的观点理论(RBV/NRBV)和偶然性理论(CT)。同时,几篇文章在一份出版物中采用了几种理论的整合。关于发表年份,从2020年起,发表了大量有基础理论的文章。这项研究为研究人员拓宽与精益绩效领域理论适应性相关的知识提供了几项重要贡献,因为以理论为基础的研究在调查研究问题方面提供了坚实而令人信服的结果。第一个限制是用于识别相关文章的搜索字符串,可以对其进行扩展以最大限度地提高文章搜索。另一个限制是使用的数据库仅限于Scopus数据库。尽管支撑理论在研究中很重要,但OM因其理论的不足而受到批评,只有三分之一的OM研究包含了理论。然而,对LM绩效理论中使用的理论进行了有限的综述。为了缩小这一差距,本文综述了LM绩效理论的应用趋势,并对LM绩效的相关理论进行了最新综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Literature Review: Theory Perspective in Lean Manufacturing Performance
Abstract This review examines the trend of applying theories in LM performance and offers the latest recapitulation of related theories in LM performance. The methodology is based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) to search for multiple scientific information databases and to guarantee that no important study is overlooked. For the single theory, highly employed theories were the Theory of Constraints, Resource-based View/Natural Resource-based View Theory (RBV/NRBV), and Contingency Theory (CT). Meanwhile, several articles employed integrations of several theories in a publication. Concerning the year of publication, significant growth in articles with underpinned theories was published from 2020 onwards. This study offers several significant contributions to researchers to widen the knowledge related to the adaptation of theories in the field of lean performance, as research underpinned by a theory offers a solid and convincing result in investigating the research problems. The first limitation was the search string to identify the related articles, which could be extended to maximize the article search. The other limitation was the database used which was limited to the Scopus database. Despite the importance of underpinning theory in research, OM has been criticized for the inadequacies of its theory, with only one-third of OM research incorporating theory. However, a limited review was conducted on the theories used in LM performance theory. To reduce this gap, this review examines the trend of applying theories in LM performance and offers the latest recapitulation of related theories in LM performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Possibility of Modeling Gas Separators using Computational Fluid Dynamics Process of Incubators in Morocco: Overview of the “Forsa” Program Research of Green Innovation of Companies of Countries with Different Levels of Technological Development of Production Work-Life Balance in SME Sector and Large Enterprises Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review in Social Manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1