为什么锚在锚定?锚定启发式的机制和原理概述

Q3 Social Sciences Decyzje Pub Date : 2017-12-15 DOI:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.96
P. Tomczak
{"title":"为什么锚在锚定?锚定启发式的机制和原理概述","authors":"P. Tomczak","doi":"10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews the literature regarding the anchoring heuristic. Despite substantial empirical background the anchoring effect cannot be fully explained with just one psychological mechanism. In the first part of the article the classical mechanisms of anchoring are discussed – the insufficient adjustment mechanism and the selective accessibility Additionally, alternative theoretical explanations of the anchoring effect are discussed. In the second part of the article experimental procedures that are used to investigate the anchoring effect are revised. According to the literature paying suffi cient attention to the anchor or compatibility between the anchor and the estimation target determine the effectiveness of the anchoring. However, collating those conditions with results obtained with different anchoring procedures show that those rules are not universal. Highlighted theoretical questions indicate a possible direction for further research aimed at fi nding one psychological mechanism that fully explains the anchoring effect.","PeriodicalId":37255,"journal":{"name":"Decyzje","volume":"1 1","pages":"93-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dlaczego kotwica kotwiczy? Przegląd mechanizmów i zasad działania heurystyki zakotwiczenia\",\"authors\":\"P. Tomczak\",\"doi\":\"10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reviews the literature regarding the anchoring heuristic. Despite substantial empirical background the anchoring effect cannot be fully explained with just one psychological mechanism. In the first part of the article the classical mechanisms of anchoring are discussed – the insufficient adjustment mechanism and the selective accessibility Additionally, alternative theoretical explanations of the anchoring effect are discussed. In the second part of the article experimental procedures that are used to investigate the anchoring effect are revised. According to the literature paying suffi cient attention to the anchor or compatibility between the anchor and the estimation target determine the effectiveness of the anchoring. However, collating those conditions with results obtained with different anchoring procedures show that those rules are not universal. Highlighted theoretical questions indicate a possible direction for further research aimed at fi nding one psychological mechanism that fully explains the anchoring effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decyzje\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"93-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decyzje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decyzje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文综述了锚定启发式的相关文献。尽管有大量的经验背景,锚定效应不能仅仅用一种心理机制来完全解释。本文第一部分讨论了锚定效应的经典机制——调整不足机制和选择性可达性,并讨论了锚定效应的其他理论解释。在文章的第二部分,对锚定效应研究的实验程序进行了修正。根据文献,是否足够重视锚点或锚点与估计目标的相容性决定了锚点的有效性。然而,将这些条件与不同锚定程序获得的结果进行比较,发现这些规则并不普遍。突出的理论问题表明了进一步研究的可能方向,旨在寻找一种充分解释锚定效应的心理机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dlaczego kotwica kotwiczy? Przegląd mechanizmów i zasad działania heurystyki zakotwiczenia
This paper reviews the literature regarding the anchoring heuristic. Despite substantial empirical background the anchoring effect cannot be fully explained with just one psychological mechanism. In the first part of the article the classical mechanisms of anchoring are discussed – the insufficient adjustment mechanism and the selective accessibility Additionally, alternative theoretical explanations of the anchoring effect are discussed. In the second part of the article experimental procedures that are used to investigate the anchoring effect are revised. According to the literature paying suffi cient attention to the anchor or compatibility between the anchor and the estimation target determine the effectiveness of the anchoring. However, collating those conditions with results obtained with different anchoring procedures show that those rules are not universal. Highlighted theoretical questions indicate a possible direction for further research aimed at fi nding one psychological mechanism that fully explains the anchoring effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decyzje
Decyzje Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Maurice Allais o podejmowaniu decyzji W te gry więźniowie nie grają. Instytucje rzeczywistej subkultury więziennej łagodzące konflikt i przemoc w kontraście do eksperymentu Zimbardo Gary S. Becker i Kevin M. Murphy – „Ekonomia społeczna. Co wpływa na zachowania jednostki” Show issue Year 6/2021  Issue 35 Sensitivity of numerate individuals to large asymmetry in outcomes: A registered replication of Traczyk et al. (2018) Primacy Effects in Poland – supplement to Steven Linder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1