父母拒绝接种疫苗的伦理:成本、社区安全和个人权利

Olatanwa Adewale, C. Cooper, Pascal Felix, A. Mitchell, J. Savage, William Mase
{"title":"父母拒绝接种疫苗的伦理:成本、社区安全和个人权利","authors":"Olatanwa Adewale, C. Cooper, Pascal Felix, A. Mitchell, J. Savage, William Mase","doi":"10.20429/jgpha.2019.070215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), vaccination has reduced the burden of infectious diseases to a significant extent. In recent times, however, the focus has been more on vaccine safety rather than effectiveness. As with any other public health program, immunizations and associated policies are designed to protect the health of the public. Compared to minor risks of side effects of vaccination, the risk of infection often rationalizes the use of vaccination. In states like Georgia, with fewer outbreaks associated with non-vaccination, the need to access community immunity remains constant. Though some articles have assessed parental refusal of childhood vaccination as an ethical concern, few have addressed the economic burden to society as a result of parental rights to refuse vaccination in the ethical contexts of rights, outbreak costs, and community safety. Methods: A literature review was conducted on both qualitative and quantitative studies that described the ethical issues associated with parental refusal of child vaccinations. Electronic databases through PubMed and EBSCO search engines were examined for studies conducted between 2012-2018. Five reviewers independently assessed those articles for content and relevance. Results: Forty-seven articles were identified by a subject matter expert and assessed by the five reviewers. Nineteen articles, based on relevance and theme were selected by consensus to include in this review. Article themes of “rights of parents,” “community rights,” and “costs associated with outbreak or mitigation of outbreak” were examined. Conclusions: Ethical issues of community safety and costs of the outbreak, as well as the rights of the child, should be considered in the debate of childhood vaccination. Research, policy, and parental education strategies should also take ethical implications into account to encourage well-informed policy and parental decision-making.","PeriodicalId":73981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethics of Parental Refusal to Vaccinate: Costs, Community Safety, and Individual Rights\",\"authors\":\"Olatanwa Adewale, C. Cooper, Pascal Felix, A. Mitchell, J. Savage, William Mase\",\"doi\":\"10.20429/jgpha.2019.070215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), vaccination has reduced the burden of infectious diseases to a significant extent. In recent times, however, the focus has been more on vaccine safety rather than effectiveness. As with any other public health program, immunizations and associated policies are designed to protect the health of the public. Compared to minor risks of side effects of vaccination, the risk of infection often rationalizes the use of vaccination. In states like Georgia, with fewer outbreaks associated with non-vaccination, the need to access community immunity remains constant. Though some articles have assessed parental refusal of childhood vaccination as an ethical concern, few have addressed the economic burden to society as a result of parental rights to refuse vaccination in the ethical contexts of rights, outbreak costs, and community safety. Methods: A literature review was conducted on both qualitative and quantitative studies that described the ethical issues associated with parental refusal of child vaccinations. Electronic databases through PubMed and EBSCO search engines were examined for studies conducted between 2012-2018. Five reviewers independently assessed those articles for content and relevance. Results: Forty-seven articles were identified by a subject matter expert and assessed by the five reviewers. Nineteen articles, based on relevance and theme were selected by consensus to include in this review. Article themes of “rights of parents,” “community rights,” and “costs associated with outbreak or mitigation of outbreak” were examined. Conclusions: Ethical issues of community safety and costs of the outbreak, as well as the rights of the child, should be considered in the debate of childhood vaccination. Research, policy, and parental education strategies should also take ethical implications into account to encourage well-informed policy and parental decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20429/jgpha.2019.070215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20429/jgpha.2019.070215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织),疫苗接种在很大程度上减轻了传染病的负担。然而,近年来,人们更多地关注疫苗的安全性,而不是有效性。与任何其他公共卫生计划一样,免疫接种和相关政策旨在保护公众的健康。与疫苗接种副作用的轻微风险相比,感染的风险往往使疫苗接种的使用合理化。在格鲁吉亚等州,与未接种疫苗有关的疫情较少,获得社区免疫的必要性仍然存在。尽管一些文章将父母拒绝儿童接种疫苗作为一个伦理问题进行了评估,但很少有文章从权利、爆发成本和社区安全的伦理背景出发,讨论父母拒绝接种疫苗的权利给社会带来的经济负担。方法:对描述父母拒绝儿童接种疫苗相关伦理问题的定性和定量研究进行文献综述。通过PubMed和EBSCO搜索引擎检查了2012-2018年间进行的研究的电子数据库。五名审稿人独立评估了这些文章的内容和相关性。结果:47篇文章由一位主题专家鉴定,并由五位审稿人评估。根据相关性和主题,经协商一致选择了19篇文章纳入本综述。研究了“父母的权利”、“社区权利”和“与爆发或缓解爆发有关的成本”等条款主题。结论:在讨论儿童疫苗接种问题时,应考虑社区安全、疫情成本以及儿童权利等伦理问题。研究、政策和父母教育战略也应考虑到伦理影响,以鼓励明智的政策和父母的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ethics of Parental Refusal to Vaccinate: Costs, Community Safety, and Individual Rights
Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), vaccination has reduced the burden of infectious diseases to a significant extent. In recent times, however, the focus has been more on vaccine safety rather than effectiveness. As with any other public health program, immunizations and associated policies are designed to protect the health of the public. Compared to minor risks of side effects of vaccination, the risk of infection often rationalizes the use of vaccination. In states like Georgia, with fewer outbreaks associated with non-vaccination, the need to access community immunity remains constant. Though some articles have assessed parental refusal of childhood vaccination as an ethical concern, few have addressed the economic burden to society as a result of parental rights to refuse vaccination in the ethical contexts of rights, outbreak costs, and community safety. Methods: A literature review was conducted on both qualitative and quantitative studies that described the ethical issues associated with parental refusal of child vaccinations. Electronic databases through PubMed and EBSCO search engines were examined for studies conducted between 2012-2018. Five reviewers independently assessed those articles for content and relevance. Results: Forty-seven articles were identified by a subject matter expert and assessed by the five reviewers. Nineteen articles, based on relevance and theme were selected by consensus to include in this review. Article themes of “rights of parents,” “community rights,” and “costs associated with outbreak or mitigation of outbreak” were examined. Conclusions: Ethical issues of community safety and costs of the outbreak, as well as the rights of the child, should be considered in the debate of childhood vaccination. Research, policy, and parental education strategies should also take ethical implications into account to encourage well-informed policy and parental decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health Communications Trial with a Resistant Population to Increase Public Health Compliance during a Pandemic An analysis of Georgia mothers who gave birth in 2015 and 2016 without receiving prenatal care Role of Community-level Health Behaviors and Social Determinants of Health in Preventable Hospitalizations Elderly Educated Blacks and the influence of exercise identity, self-determination, and social determinants of health on physical activity Perception of Health Care Access in Rural Georgia: Findings From a Community Health Needs Assessment Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1