{"title":"回复：对Mertens等人的评论","authors":"K. Mertens, M. C. Carbonell-Moore","doi":"10.1080/01916122.2022.2148304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gottschling et al. (2022) remarked that in our attempt to epitypify the dinoflagellate Micracanthodium setiferum (Lohmann) Deflandre we did not report images of the setae, and that we ‘did not show or mention the characteristic number and arrangement of the setaeʼ. Although it is correct that no images were shown of these setae in light microscopy, we did mention that there are two kinds of cells and we noted the arrangement of the setae and its importance for its identification:","PeriodicalId":54644,"journal":{"name":"Palynology","volume":"47 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to: Comments on Mertens et al. (2022): The Taxonomic Identity of Micracanthodinium setiferum (Lohmann) Deflandre (Dinophyceae Incertae sedis) Remains Elusive, and Its Epitypification is Not Achieved\",\"authors\":\"K. Mertens, M. C. Carbonell-Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01916122.2022.2148304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gottschling et al. (2022) remarked that in our attempt to epitypify the dinoflagellate Micracanthodium setiferum (Lohmann) Deflandre we did not report images of the setae, and that we ‘did not show or mention the characteristic number and arrangement of the setaeʼ. Although it is correct that no images were shown of these setae in light microscopy, we did mention that there are two kinds of cells and we noted the arrangement of the setae and its importance for its identification:\",\"PeriodicalId\":54644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palynology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palynology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2022.2148304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palynology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2022.2148304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Gottschling et al.(2022)指出，在我们试图描述鞭毛藻Micracanthodium setiferum (Lohmann) Deflandre时，我们没有报告刚毛的图像，并且我们“没有显示或提及刚毛的特征数量和排列”。虽然在光学显微镜下没有显示这些刚毛的图像是正确的，但我们确实提到了有两种细胞，我们注意到了刚毛的排列及其对鉴定的重要性:
Reply to: Comments on Mertens et al. (2022): The Taxonomic Identity of Micracanthodinium setiferum (Lohmann) Deflandre (Dinophyceae Incertae sedis) Remains Elusive, and Its Epitypification is Not Achieved
Gottschling et al. (2022) remarked that in our attempt to epitypify the dinoflagellate Micracanthodium setiferum (Lohmann) Deflandre we did not report images of the setae, and that we ‘did not show or mention the characteristic number and arrangement of the setaeʼ. Although it is correct that no images were shown of these setae in light microscopy, we did mention that there are two kinds of cells and we noted the arrangement of the setae and its importance for its identification:
期刊介绍：
Palynology is an international journal, and covers all aspects of the science. We accept papers on both pre-Quaternary and Quaternary palynology and palaeobotany. Contributions on novel uses of palynology, review articles, book reviews, taxonomic studies and papers on methodology are all actively encouraged.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
