聚合酶链反应检测利什曼原虫DNA提取方法的评价

Leticia Surian Batalini, S. Castro, Carla Geórgia Rodrigues Guimarães Souto, H. Neitzke-Abreu, M. Lima-Júnior
{"title":"聚合酶链反应检测利什曼原虫DNA提取方法的评价","authors":"Leticia Surian Batalini, S. Castro, Carla Geórgia Rodrigues Guimarães Souto, H. Neitzke-Abreu, M. Lima-Júnior","doi":"10.4236/ajmb.2020.104018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several methods used to obtain DNA from cells; however, the quantity, integrity, and purity of DNA vary among the methods, which may interfere with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results. The objective was to determine the most efficient and cost-effective method that provides the best DNA yield and PCR results. Three methods of DNA isolation were compared: 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), guanidine isothiocyanate-phenol-chloroform (GTPC), and DNA extraction using a commercial kit (GE Healthcare GenomicPrep Blood DNA Isolation KitTM). Human peripheral blood samples were inoculated with 104 promastigotes of Leishmania infantum. DNA was quantified and PCR was performed with 13A/13B primers. The results showed that a higher DNA yield was obtained using the GTPC technique (214.51 ng/μL), followed by SDS (26.16 ng/μL) and the commercial kit (10.99 ng/μL). We concluded that while all of the techniques were effective for obtaining DNA, the GTPC method provided the best yield and the brightest bands.","PeriodicalId":65391,"journal":{"name":"美国分子生物学期刊(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods for Detection of Leishmania by Polymerase Chain Reaction\",\"authors\":\"Leticia Surian Batalini, S. Castro, Carla Geórgia Rodrigues Guimarães Souto, H. Neitzke-Abreu, M. Lima-Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ajmb.2020.104018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are several methods used to obtain DNA from cells; however, the quantity, integrity, and purity of DNA vary among the methods, which may interfere with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results. The objective was to determine the most efficient and cost-effective method that provides the best DNA yield and PCR results. Three methods of DNA isolation were compared: 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), guanidine isothiocyanate-phenol-chloroform (GTPC), and DNA extraction using a commercial kit (GE Healthcare GenomicPrep Blood DNA Isolation KitTM). Human peripheral blood samples were inoculated with 104 promastigotes of Leishmania infantum. DNA was quantified and PCR was performed with 13A/13B primers. The results showed that a higher DNA yield was obtained using the GTPC technique (214.51 ng/μL), followed by SDS (26.16 ng/μL) and the commercial kit (10.99 ng/μL). We concluded that while all of the techniques were effective for obtaining DNA, the GTPC method provided the best yield and the brightest bands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":65391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"美国分子生物学期刊(英文)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"美国分子生物学期刊(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ajmb.2020.104018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"美国分子生物学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ajmb.2020.104018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有几种方法可以用来从细胞中获得DNA;然而,DNA的数量、完整性和纯度因方法而异,这可能会干扰聚合酶链式反应(PCR)的结果。目的是确定提供最佳DNA产量和PCR结果的最有效和最具成本效益的方法。比较了三种DNA分离方法:20%十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)、异硫氰酸胍苯酚氯仿(GTPC)和使用商业试剂盒(GE Healthcare GenomicPrep Blood DNA isolation KitTM)提取DNA。用104个婴儿利什曼原虫前体接种人外周血样本。对DNA进行定量,并用13A/13B引物进行PCR。结果表明,GTPC技术的DNA产量较高(214.51ng/ml),SDS(26.16ng/ml)和商业试剂盒(10.99ng/ml)次之。我们得出的结论是,虽然所有的技术都能有效地获得DNA,但GTPC方法提供了最好的产量和最亮的条带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods for Detection of Leishmania by Polymerase Chain Reaction
There are several methods used to obtain DNA from cells; however, the quantity, integrity, and purity of DNA vary among the methods, which may interfere with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results. The objective was to determine the most efficient and cost-effective method that provides the best DNA yield and PCR results. Three methods of DNA isolation were compared: 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), guanidine isothiocyanate-phenol-chloroform (GTPC), and DNA extraction using a commercial kit (GE Healthcare GenomicPrep Blood DNA Isolation KitTM). Human peripheral blood samples were inoculated with 104 promastigotes of Leishmania infantum. DNA was quantified and PCR was performed with 13A/13B primers. The results showed that a higher DNA yield was obtained using the GTPC technique (214.51 ng/μL), followed by SDS (26.16 ng/μL) and the commercial kit (10.99 ng/μL). We concluded that while all of the techniques were effective for obtaining DNA, the GTPC method provided the best yield and the brightest bands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
188
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Two Molecular Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19: Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 and Allplex™ 2019-nCoV, in the Epidemic Context in Senegal Identification and Characterization of Hepatitis B Virus Immune Escape Mutants in Kenya Comparative Performance of Microscopy and Nested PCR for the Detection of Cryptosporidium Species in Patients Living with HIV/Aids in Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire) Insight into Genetic Diversity of Cultivated Lima Bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) in Benin Association of Host Interferon-γ Gene Polymorphism with Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Pregnant Women of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1