书评:《分区中国:网络视频、流行文化与国家》

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION Global Media and Communication Pub Date : 2020-11-23 DOI:10.1177/1742766520973563
Xiaoxi Zhu
{"title":"书评:《分区中国:网络视频、流行文化与国家》","authors":"Xiaoxi Zhu","doi":"10.1177/1742766520973563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"reader to wonder if perhaps this is why digital platforms have been studiously left out of the global media mix for so long. Another missed chance comes at the end of the book, which does not finish with a concluding chapter. Perhaps a matter of taste for some scholars, but particularly in a textbook that seeks to break new ground, the lack of a concluding chapter is strongly felt. Finally, one wonders if there are not missed opportunities in focus. A fair amount of the book seems to go through the paces of highlighting company ownership and revenues, but it does not venture into the most significant contemporary issues connected with digital platforms, specifically anti-trust, platform wars and competition, relentless freedom of speech issues, etc. Comparing and contrasting ownership issues of digital platforms with “traditional” media companies could bear fruit for the field and bring it to the next level. Globalization and Media in the Digital Platform Age by Dal Yong Jin represents a more inclusive and realistic approach to a textbook for students of media globalization, global communication, and global media studies by including digital platforms in its scope. However welcome or controversial this may be, the basic template for textbooks in the area of media and globalization survives with this volume. If building on the bedrock of historical background and using quantitative approaches to describe the present—as it was, inevitably—then this title is a strong one. Perhaps the next step, however, is to break with the descriptive quantitative approach to global media, and more actively pursue the “convergence of political economy and cultural studies” that the author sees as being “especially crucial as several digital platforms, including Netflix and Facebook, act as content producer, distributor, and consumer at the same time” (p. 33).","PeriodicalId":45157,"journal":{"name":"Global Media and Communication","volume":"16 1","pages":"383 - 385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1742766520973563","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Zoning China: Online Video, Popular Culture, and the State\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxi Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1742766520973563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"reader to wonder if perhaps this is why digital platforms have been studiously left out of the global media mix for so long. Another missed chance comes at the end of the book, which does not finish with a concluding chapter. Perhaps a matter of taste for some scholars, but particularly in a textbook that seeks to break new ground, the lack of a concluding chapter is strongly felt. Finally, one wonders if there are not missed opportunities in focus. A fair amount of the book seems to go through the paces of highlighting company ownership and revenues, but it does not venture into the most significant contemporary issues connected with digital platforms, specifically anti-trust, platform wars and competition, relentless freedom of speech issues, etc. Comparing and contrasting ownership issues of digital platforms with “traditional” media companies could bear fruit for the field and bring it to the next level. Globalization and Media in the Digital Platform Age by Dal Yong Jin represents a more inclusive and realistic approach to a textbook for students of media globalization, global communication, and global media studies by including digital platforms in its scope. However welcome or controversial this may be, the basic template for textbooks in the area of media and globalization survives with this volume. If building on the bedrock of historical background and using quantitative approaches to describe the present—as it was, inevitably—then this title is a strong one. Perhaps the next step, however, is to break with the descriptive quantitative approach to global media, and more actively pursue the “convergence of political economy and cultural studies” that the author sees as being “especially crucial as several digital platforms, including Netflix and Facebook, act as content producer, distributor, and consumer at the same time” (p. 33).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Media and Communication\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"383 - 385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1742766520973563\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Media and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766520973563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766520973563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

读者可能会想,这就是为什么数字平台这么长时间被刻意排除在全球媒体组合之外的原因。另一个错失的机会出现在书的最后,书中没有最后一章。也许这是一些学者的喜好问题,但尤其是在一本寻求开辟新领域的教科书中,缺乏结论章的感觉很强烈。最后,人们不禁要问,是否有错失的机会。书中相当多的篇幅似乎都在强调公司所有权和收入,但它并没有冒险进入与数字平台相关的最重要的当代问题,特别是反垄断、平台战争和竞争、无情的言论自由问题等。将数字平台与“传统”媒体公司的所有权问题进行比较和对比,可能会为该领域带来成果,并将其提升到一个新的水平。《数字平台时代的全球化与媒体》一书将数字平台纳入了研究范围,为媒体全球化、全球传播和全球媒体研究的学生提供了更包容、更现实的方法。无论这可能是受欢迎的还是有争议的,媒体和全球化领域的教科书的基本模板随着这本书而存在。如果建立在历史背景的基础上,并使用定量的方法来描述现在——这是不可避免的——那么这个标题是一个强有力的。然而,也许下一步是打破对全球媒体的描述性定量方法,更积极地追求“政治经济和文化研究的融合”,作者认为这是“尤其重要的,因为包括Netflix和Facebook在内的几个数字平台同时充当内容生产者、分销商和消费者”(第33页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book review: Zoning China: Online Video, Popular Culture, and the State
reader to wonder if perhaps this is why digital platforms have been studiously left out of the global media mix for so long. Another missed chance comes at the end of the book, which does not finish with a concluding chapter. Perhaps a matter of taste for some scholars, but particularly in a textbook that seeks to break new ground, the lack of a concluding chapter is strongly felt. Finally, one wonders if there are not missed opportunities in focus. A fair amount of the book seems to go through the paces of highlighting company ownership and revenues, but it does not venture into the most significant contemporary issues connected with digital platforms, specifically anti-trust, platform wars and competition, relentless freedom of speech issues, etc. Comparing and contrasting ownership issues of digital platforms with “traditional” media companies could bear fruit for the field and bring it to the next level. Globalization and Media in the Digital Platform Age by Dal Yong Jin represents a more inclusive and realistic approach to a textbook for students of media globalization, global communication, and global media studies by including digital platforms in its scope. However welcome or controversial this may be, the basic template for textbooks in the area of media and globalization survives with this volume. If building on the bedrock of historical background and using quantitative approaches to describe the present—as it was, inevitably—then this title is a strong one. Perhaps the next step, however, is to break with the descriptive quantitative approach to global media, and more actively pursue the “convergence of political economy and cultural studies” that the author sees as being “especially crucial as several digital platforms, including Netflix and Facebook, act as content producer, distributor, and consumer at the same time” (p. 33).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Global Media and Communication is an international peer-reviewed journal launched in April 2005 as a key forum for articulating critical debates and developments in the continuously changing global media and communications environment. As a pioneering platform for the exchange of ideas and multiple perspectives, the journal addresses fresh and contentious research agendas and promotes an academic dialogue that is fully transnational and transdisciplinary in its scope. With a network of ten regional editors around the world, the journal offers a global source of material on international media and cultural processes. Special features include interviews, reviews of recent media developments and digests of policy documents and data reports from a variety of countries.
期刊最新文献
Exploring local, experimenting with transnational: Producing Turkish television series Mainstreaming anti-Semitism on Turkey’s public broadcaster TRT: Examining Payitaht: Abdülhamid Technology and geopolitics: The social construction of Huawei’s 5G controversy in Europe Talking back to the wall: Problematizing trans/national media and counter-publics in border politics Public fear or public sphere? A content analysis of user comments on Egyptian newspaper Facebook pages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1